Batya Ungar-Sargon Said Something That Made Every Dem on This CNN Panel Uncomfortable
Chuck Schumer's Reaction to This Question About the LA Riots Really Says It...
Meet the Woman Who Symbolizes Everything About Leftists Mayhem
Why There Was 'No Alternative' for ABC News Regarding Firing Terry Moran
On the Upside, Gavin Newsom Is Toast
Congratulations, Brian Stelter, You’re 99 Percent Cancer-Free!
Anti-ICE Protests Explode in 37 Cities—And It’s Getting Ugly
New York's Radical 'Assisted Suicide' Bill Is Now on Hochul's Desk
Breaking: Hundreds Dead After Air India Plane Bound for London Crashes
New Ad Calls on Trump to Put the Pressure on Canada Over Northern...
Republicans Once Again Defeat Democrats in Congressional Baseball Game
LA City Council Member Makes Absurd Demand of Police Chief. Here's How He...
The Scavenger Mentality
Greta Thunberg Refused to Watch Footage of the Atrocities on Oct. 7 After...
The Supreme Court’s Anti-Second Amendment 'Ghost Gun' Case: Judicial Amendment by 'Interpr...
Tipsheet

Liberal Law Professor: White House is Right About Comey Potentially Breaking the Law

Earlier this week White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders strongly implied the Department of Justice should be looking at prosecuting former FBI Director James Comey on a number of fronts. 

Advertisement

Q: Would the President encourage DOJ to prosecute Comey?

Sanders: That's not the President's role that's the job of the Department of Justice and something they should certainly look at.

Q: Is that something you would like to see?

Sanders: I'm not sure about that specifically but I think if there's ever a moment that where we feel someone's broken the law, particularly if they're the head of the FBI, I think that's something that certainly should be looked at.


It turns out, George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, a Democrat, is backing Sanders' assertions. 

In a column for The Hill, Turley argues the press shouldn't be defending Comey or his actions. He focuses on Comey's memos about his meetings with President Trump, which he leaked to the press through a friend for personal benefit rather than to simply help the Special Counsel leading the Russia probe. 

Comey disclosed key evidence that undermined, rather than assisted, investigators. The value of these memos to investigators was to have the evidence without the White House knowing about their existence. In later interviews, any conflicting statements could be charged as false statements under 18 U.S.C. 1001, the most successful grounds for prosecutors in past Washington scandals. Moreover, Comey damaged his own value as a witness. Comey was tasked with finding leakers in the administration but then immediately became a leaker himself when it served his purposes.

Comey’s defenders have scoffed that the notion that Comey even acted unprofessionally, let alone illegally.

Comey insisted that he wrote the memos as a type of shield, but he then used them as a sword once he was fired. None of this means that Comey's actions warrant a criminal charge or that those actions exonerate others in the investigation, including President Trump. But at the end of the day, the White House is correct that Comey’s conduct can constitute violations of federal law and regulations.

Advertisement

Pressure on Comey has increased in recent weeks after it was revealed he made the decision to exonerate Hillary Clinton months before FBI agents had interviewed more than a dozen key witness in the case and long before a thorough investigation was complete. 

Calls for Comey to testify in front of Congress to clarify previous congressional testimony, which is now highly suspect, are getting louder. Yesterday Republican Lindsey Graham threatened to issue a subpoena for the former FBI director if he chooses not comply with future Senate requests. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement