Israeli Military Intelligence Gave a Shocking Update on the Iran Protests
MS NOW Opposes Officers With Cams, CNN’s Sweet Prose for an ICE Agitator,...
America vs. F**K YOU!
Is America Destroying Itself?
Greenland or Bust: The Compelling Case for Acquisition
The Gift of America and the Gift of Life
Banning the Muslim Brotherhood: A Good Start, Part 1
Negotiating With an Aggressor: Why Diplomacy Alone Cannot End Russia’s War
The Cost of Reckless Disclosure
Anti-ICE Agitators Storm Hotels and Overwhelm Police
New York Man Indicted for Threatening to Kill Federal Agent and His Children
Texas Couple Convicted of Running $25M COVID-Era Pyramid Scheme That Defrauded 10,000 Vict...
Automakers Eat Billion-Dollar Losses on Electric Vehicles
Texas AG Ken Paxton Shuts Down Taxpayer Funded 'Abortion Tourism'
$500K Stolen, 20 States Targeted: Detroit Man Admits Wire Fraud and Identity Theft
Tipsheet

"Pro-Life" Candidate Tried to Expand Medical Authority for Abortion Doctors

Republican Texas State Rep. Dan Branch is running as a pro-life candidate to become Attorney General in the Lone Star State, but his history of authoring an amendment that would have expanded medical authority for abortion doctors is getting in the way.

Advertisement

Back in 2005, healthcare legislation was being debated in the Texas legislature. An amendment to that legislation was attached to ban third-trimester abortions. Rep. Branch then added another amendment expanding the authority for abortion doctors to perform late-term abortions if a baby had "vital organ impairment." "Vital organ impairment" was not specifically defined and would be determined solely by the abortion doctor. The legislation did not require a second opinion from a non-abortion doctor before the late-term procedure was performed. More on Branch's language:

His proposed language would have banned third-trimester abortions "when the viable unborn child does not have a severe, irreversible brain or vital organ impairment.” The original bill allowed for such late-term abortions in the instance of “irreversible brain” impairment only.

In an interview with Breitbart Texas, Texas Right to Life Executive Director Elizabeth Graham and Director of the Department of State Legislation for National Right to Life Mary Spaulding Balch are sounding the alarm about Branch portraying himself as a staunchly pro-life candidate.

"Had Branch’s amendment passed, abortions would be allowed in the third trimester if the child suffered ’impairment of a vital organ,' a judgment call that would have been made by the abortionist who makes a substantial profit off these late abortions," said Graham, whose organization has endorsed Branch's opponent in the run-off. Graham added, “And what exactly was meant by 'impairment'—diminished function? Temporarily slowed function? Function that could be improved or cured with treatment? The term was undefined, ambiguous at best, and left to the interpretation of the abortionist."

"There is no definition of 'vital organ’," Balch said. "When you look at 'vital organs' it would add to the number of third trimester abortions."
Advertisement

Related:

TEXAS

Branch and his campaign argue the amendment and language offered in 2005 strengthened, not weakened the third-trimester abortion ban. The campaign is also touting Branch's work to pass sonogram legislation requiring a 24-hour waiting period before abortions and his support for Texas' most recent late-term abortion ban, HB2, which passed in 2013.

Branch is in a run-off election with Republican Ken Paxton. Paxton is also running on a pro-life platform.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement