Men Are Going to Strike Back
The Trump Team Quoted the Perfect TV Show to Defend a Proposed WH...
Why This Former CNN Reporter Saying He'd Fire Scott Jennings Is Amusing
Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things
CA Governor Election 2026: Bianco or Hilton
Same Old, Same Old
The Real Purveyors of Jim Crow
Senior Voters Are Key for a GOP Victory in Midterms
The Deep State’s Inversion Matrix Must Be Seen to Be Defeated
Situational Science and Trans Medicine
Trump Slams Bad Bunny's Horrendous Halftime Show
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
The Turning Point Halftime Show Crushed Expectations
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ As Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Tipsheet

More Evidence That Cap-And-Tax Is Regressive

Sens. Kerry and Boxer are introducing cap-and-trade legislation this week -- probably tomorrow -- which the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has determined will have a progressive tax impact on Americans across income groups.
Advertisement
Not so, says a new report from a leading independent economics research firm.
Under the assumption that company shareholders will enjoy the benefit of free allowances under Waxman-Markey, households in the nation’s highest-earning quintile would profit by $604 per year on a net basis from the legislation. In contrast, the lowest earning 80 percent of households would bear net burdens of between $31 and $512 per year, with the heaviest burdens borne by the three middle quintiles that broadly constitute the nation’s “middle class.” Under this assumption, the Waxman-Markey bill would effectively redistribute approximately $14 billion per year from the lowest-earning 80 percent of households to the highest-earning 20 percent of families in the nation.
This follows in the footsteps of earlier research by the Tax Foundation.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement