Here's How Democrats Are Ruining Air Travel As Well
So, That's How the Montreal Shooter Described Himself
Hillary Clinton's Latest Remarks on the Electoral College Are Not Surprising. Get Over...
Black Radio Host Dropped a Sound Take About the Knicks Going to the...
Canada and Mexico Put on Blast by Nonprofit for 'Abusing' Major Trade Agreement
There's Been an Update in the Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping. It's Not Good.
Ken Paxton Blasts James Talarico Over His Love for Taxes
Illegal Immigrant Busted After Using Uber Gig to Kidnap, Assault Passenger
After Smearing Elon Musk, Ro Khanna Hopes a Debate Will Spare Him a...
California Democrats Just Voted to Raise Healthcare Costs by Almost 97 Percent. Guess...
Democrats Declare War on School Choice
Iran Is Already Denying It Agreed to Nuclear Inspections
Trump Reveals Why He Isn't Worried About Releasing Frozen Iranian Funds
Tom Homan Levels Zohran Mamdani and DSA Candidate Over Their Fight to Abolish...
This New Poll Is Great News for Texas Republicans
Tipsheet

Senate Candidates Face Perjury Allegations for Election Rigging Scheme

Senate Candidates Face Perjury Allegations for Election Rigging Scheme
AP Photo/Charlie Neibergall

Nebraska’s Senate race has taken a bizarre turn after complaints were filed against two candidates alleging that they are not serious about serving in the position if they win the race.

Advertisement

Democrat Cindy Burbank and Legal Marijuana NOW nominee Mike Marvin are accused of acting as “plants” specifically to hand independent candidate Dan Osborn an opportunity to defeat GOP incumbent Pete Ricketts. 

The complaints, filed with state Attorney General Mike Hilgers’ office by former GOP state Sen. Lydia Brasch and a former GOP candidate Derek Schwartz, allege that both candidates have committed perjury by claiming they genuine sought to run for Senate when their actual plan was to clear the field for Osborn, the Nebraska Examiner reported.

The complaints invoke Nebraska’s rules and perjury statutes against people simply running to unfairly influence the outcome of an election. The two candidates allegedly made false sworn statements by signing the oath to seek and serve in the office when they actually planned to drop out of the race after winning their primaries.

Advertisement

The complaints cite Burbank’s campaign website, which argued that Osborn “deserves a fair shot against Ricketts” and framed her candidacy as an effort to support him. Marvin’s former party chair labeled him a “Don Osborn plant.” Burbank also allegedly paid Marvin’s $1,740 filing fee on the day of the deadline.

Back in March, Burbank defended her actions and admitted she paid for Marvin’s filing fee. “It pissed me off, and I paid for it … I’ve never met Mike. If Ricketts can throw his money around then so can I!” she said.

Marvin has denied any wrongdoing. “Mark states that my union activities make me a good friend of Dan Osborn,” he wrote in a Facebook post. “I have heard him speak a couple of times, but have never met or spoken with him. No one has hired me to do this; that is slanderous.”  

Advertisement

Burbank’s primary opponent was William Forbes, a 79-year-old pastor who ran as a Democrat. However, some have alleged that Forbes was a plant for the Republican Party due to his support for President Donald Trump and stances on abortion and other issues. The idea is that Burbank wanted to defeat Forbes to win the nomination, then drop out and back Osborn.

If the allegations are true, it means these candidates were trying to game the system to give their preferred candidate a better chance of unseating Ricketts. If prosecuted and convicted, they could spend up to seven years in prison.

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Townhall's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement