Alex Pretti Failed This IQ Test
Stand With ICE
Minnesota Man Impersonating a Federal Agent Tried to Bust Luigi Mangione Out of...
The Rise of the New Confederacy
Cultural Apocalypse
Trump Accounts Will Restore the Family As the Cornerstone of the American Dream
The Elitist Media Still Impose a Dominant Partisan Narrative
Big Surprises in the 2030 Census Estimates
'Common Sense' at 250
Puerto Rico Can Power Trump’s 'Made in America' Medicine Agenda
When Democracy Goes Awry
Immigration Fairy Tales
The End of the Islamic Republic Must Be the Only Objective
Florida Man Forfeits Rolls-Royce, Estate After Guilty Plea in $52M Medicare Scam
Convicted Killer Sentenced to 15 Years for Iran-Directed Plot to Murder Journalist
Tipsheet

Letitia James Might've Found a Way to Avoid Being Convicted of Mortgage Fraud

AP Photo/Ted Shaffrey

New York Attorney General is facing charges of mortgage fraud for allegedly providing false information on an application to obtain favorable loan terms.

The Justice Department alleges that James misrepresented a home she owns in Norfolk, Virginia, as a second residence when, in reality, she has been renting it out to relatives. James has pleaded not guilty to the charges, and there could be one issue that might allow her to walk free, according to Politico:

Advertisement

The politically charged mortgage fraud indictment against New York Attorney General Letitia James accuses her of lying to lenders in order to get a favorable loan rate on a second home. She then rented the property, the indictment alleges, in violation of the terms of the loan she obtained.

But there’s a glaring issue with that accusation: The mortgage contract James signed does not prohibit renting out the house, according to POLITICO’s review of the contract and legal and real estate experts. In fact, the key language in the contract expressly allows renting under certain conditions.

That potentially fatal flaw in the indictment is one among several problems critics have identified in the case against James, a Democrat who sued Donald Trump and secured a multi-million dollar judgment that was later thrown out. James’ allies have criticized the indictment as political vengeance.

In a five-page indictment, James is charged with two counts of financial fraud in connection with her 2020 purchase of a three-bedroom house in Norfolk, Virginia. Lindsey Halligan, Trump’s handpicked top federal prosecutor in the Eastern District of Virginia, alleges James signed a “Second Home Rider” contract that prohibits renting the property. James then rented out the home anyway, in violation of those loan terms and federal bank and mortgage fraud laws, according to the indictment.

POLITICO obtained James’ mortgage documents, including her signed “Second Home Rider” from the Norfolk Circuit Court Clerk’s Office. The rider, a standard addendum to mortgage contracts developed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, requires James to “maintain exclusive control over the occupancy of the Property, including short-term rentals.” The idea is to restrict buyers’ ability to use a “second home” as an “investment property” — by hiring a management company and using it primarily to generate income — after obtaining the lower loan rates associated with houses purchased as vacation or “second” homes.

That final, three-word phrase in the rider — “including short-term rentals” — could be decisive. In plain English, the provision means that James is explicitly permitted to rent the place out periodically, so long as she remains in charge of matters such as the number of tenants and how they use the property, legal experts say. The contract’s restrictions bar James from giving “a management firm or any other person or entity any control over the occupancy or use of the Property.”

Advertisement

The Justice Department alleges that James used the house “as a rental investment property” because she rented it out to family members. However, she did not enlist a property management company to manage the rental.

Prosecutors will have to secure a conviction by proving her intent to knowingly defraud the bank that issued the loan. They argue that the attorney general knew she was not allowed to rent out the property under these terms and highlight how the initial loan application listed the property as a “second home” while she characterized it as “rental real estate” with “zero personal use days” on her tax filings.

It’s also worth noting that the family members have been renting the home for at least five years. It might be hard for the defense to argue that this constitutes a “short-term” rental. Still, the prosecution might have an uphill battle as cases such as these rarely result in convictions — especially for those in powerful positions.

Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement