We Cannot Let These People Socialize Our Healthcare System
One of the DSA's Biggest Influencers Wants to Shred the Declaration of Independence,...
Mamdani: Priorities Tell You Everything
Man Sentenced to 5 Years After 15 Years As Fugitive in West Bank
VP JD Vance and Wife Usha Welcome Fourth Child, Baby Boy Alec Neel...
Spain Wins 2026 World Cup
Massachusetts Woman Ordered to Repay $100K in SSI Fraud Case
AOC, Sanders Rally for Democratic Socialist El-Sayed in Senate Primary Fight
Iran Conflict Claims Another American Service Member's Life
Seattle Real Estate Owner Sentenced to 20 Months for Hiding $4.7 Million From...
When ‘Born-Again’ No Longer Means Transformed
The GOP's Path to Retaining Control of the House Is Here
Mississippi Man Pleads Guilty to Stealing Nearly $17K in SNAP Benefits
This Law Means That Praying at a Northern Ireland Hospital Could Land You...
Communism Versus the 10 Commandments
Tipsheet

Here We Go Again: Another Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Effort to Rein in Spending

Here We Go Again: Another Federal Judge Blocks Trump's Effort to Rein in Spending
AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

A federal judge on Wednesday blocked the Trump administration’s efforts to slash nearly $12 billion in foreign aid that Congress previously approved.

US District Judge Amir Ali, a Biden appointee, ruled that the White House violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the main law Democrats have relied on to mount legal challenges against President Donald Trump’s policies.

Advertisement

The legal battle started when Trump issued an executive order shortly after taking office to “pause” all foreign aid. Several nonprofits, including the Global Health Council and the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition, sued the administration, arguing that the order violated the law and threatened their operations overseas.

Judge Ali agreed, arguing that the administration’s failure to spend the funds “is contrary to law in violation of the APA” and was “arbitrary and capricious.”

The judge noted that Congress explicitly directed the executive branch to spend these funds under the 2024 appropriations act. It designated funds for global health initiatives, democracy programs, and disaster assistance. However, the Trump administration refused to spend the money and allowed the funds to expire without congressional approval. Ali claimed the administration did not provide any justification to “displace the bedrock expectation that Congress’s appropriations must be followed.”

Ali further stated that withholding the funds was “completely independent of whether Defendants have complied or failed to comply with the ICA’s requirements.”

The judge rejected the administration’s arguments that the rescissions package passed earlier this year meant that federal agencies were not obligated to distribute the funds. Ali wrote, “absent Congress acting to rescind the appropriations, nothing in the ICA permits Defendants to withhold congressionally appropriated funds to run out the clock.”

Advertisement

He granted preliminary injunctions and partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs, insisting that they had legal standing because the freeze jeopardized their funding and missions. 

“This case raises questions of immense legal and practical importance, including whether there is any avenue to test the executive branch’s decision not to spend congressionally appropriated funds,” Ali wrote.

The Trump administration appealed Ali’s ruling on Thursday, according to Reuters. This case will likely go to the Supreme Court to determine whether the executive branch has the authority to unilaterally cut foreign aid. 

Editor's Note: Radical leftist judges are doing everything they can to hamstring President Trump's agenda to make America great again.

Help us hold these corrupt judges accountable for their unconstitutional rulings. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement