Finally, We Can Turn the Page on Too Late Powell
Why Mississippi's Governor Called Off a Special Session to Redraw Its Maps Today
VICTORY: SC Gov Changes Course and Will Call a Special Session to Enact...
This Democrat Just Raked the New York Times Over the Coals Over Claims...
Zohran Mamdani Is Bragging About Erasing NYC's Budget Deficit. There's Just One Problem.
The Left Will Never Stop Lying About Anti-Abortion Laws
Karen Bass and Nithya Raman Continue Their Laughable Attacks on Spencer Pratt
The Democrats' Response to Losing at the Virginia Supreme Court Just Escalated
What Happens Now That the South Carolina Supreme Court Overturned the Alex Murdaugh...
Alex Vindman’s Anti-Police Allies, Anti-ICE Views Could Become a Major Problem in Florida
LOL: Former DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas Now Claims He Wanted Biden to Close...
Mike Johnson: Republicans Must Defeat the Mamdanis of the Democratic Party
The Democrats Haven't Learned Their Lesson on Defunding the Police
The Top Democrat in CA's Governor Race Can't Even Handle a Local Interview
John Brennan Says There Is Still a 'Legion' of Intelligence Bureaucrats Working Against...
Tipsheet

The Justice Department Just Filed a Major Lawsuit Against Los Angeles – Here's Why

The Justice Department Just Filed a Major Lawsuit Against Los Angeles – Here's Why
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

The Justice Department is reportedly suing the City of Los Angeles over its sanctuary policies aimed at shielding illegal immigrants from apprehension and deportation.

Advertisement

Fox News’ Bill Melugin in a post on X announced the lawsuit, noting that the DOJ is arguing that Los Angeles’ sanctuary policies “violate the Supremacy Clause” of the US Constitution by intentionally discriminating against the federal gov by treating federal immigration officers differently than other law enforcement.”

The agency is “asking that LA’s sanctuary policies be enjoined/blocked from being enforced,” according to Melugin.

In a statement to Fox News, the Justice Department claimed “Sanctuary policies were the driving cause of the violence, chaos, and attacks on law enforcement that Americans recently witnessed in Los Angeles” and that “Jurisdictions like Los Angeles that flout federal law by prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens are undermining law enforcement at every level — it ends under President Trump.”

"Sanctuary City laws and policies are designed to deliberately impede federal immigration officers’ ability to carry out their responsibilities in those jurisdictions,” according to an excerpt from the lawsuit. “The Los Angeles Ordinance and other policies intentionally discriminate against the Federal Government by treating federal immigration authorities differently than other law enforcement agents through access restrictions both to property and to individual detainees, by prohibiting contractors and sub-contractors from providing information, and by disfavoring federal criminal laws that the City of Los Angeles has decided not to comply with.”

Advertisement

The lawsuit adds: “The Supremacy Clause prohibits the City of Los Angeles and its officials from singling out the Federal Government for adverse treatment—as the challenged law and policies do—thereby discriminating against the Federal Government. Accordingly, the law and policies challenged here are invalid and should be enjoined."

The existence of sanctuary cities has long been a contentious issue. Supporters argue that states should have the autonomy to determine whether they will cooperate with federal immigration authorities. However, critics insist that this is a violation of the Supremacy Clause and that hindering federal law enforcement makes it harder for them to apprehend and deport illegal immigrants.

Under President Donald Trump’s first administration, the Justice Department sought to withhold funding from sanctuary states and cities. The City of San Francisco challenged the policy, which was enacted in 2017. The matter even made it to the Supreme Court. 

Advertisement

The city argued that Trump’s executive order caused constitutional, budgetary, and community harms. It said the order violated the anti-commandeering principle and other constitutional protections.

Conversely, the Justice Department countered by pointing out that sanctuary policies obstructed immigration enforcement and undermined federal authority under the Supremacy Clause.

However, the Supreme Court never got to issue a ruling on the matter because after former President Joe Biden took office, the Justice Department dropped its appeal. However, it appears the second Trump administration is preparing to take another swing at sanctuary cities.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos