Pre-Election Special SALE: 60% Off VIP Membership
BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules on Whether Virginia Can Remove Non-Citizens From Voter Rolls
Tim Walz's Gaming Session With Ocasio-Cortez Was a Trainwreck
Oregon Predicates Request to Judge on Self-Delusion
GDP Report Shows Economy 'Weaker Than Expected'
How Trump Plans to Help Compensate Victims of 'Migrant Crime'
NRCC Blasts the Left's Voter Suppression Efforts in Battleground Districts
Watch Trump's Reaction to Finding Out Biden Called His Supporters 'Garbage'
Scott Jennings Calls Out CNN Host, Panelists Trying to Desperately Explain Away Biden's...
There Was a Vile, Violent Attack in Chicago, and the Media's Been Silent....
One Red State Just Acquired a Massive Amount of Land to Secure Its...
Poll Out of Texas Shows That Harris Rally Sure Didn't Work for Colin...
This Hollywood Actor Is Persuading Christian Men to Vote for Kamala Harris
Is the Trump Campaign Over-Confident?
Is This Really How the Kamala HQ Is Going to Respond to Biden’s...
Tipsheet

Texas Elector Says He’s Not Voting For Trump

Christopher Suprun, a Republican member of the Electoral College in Texas, has promised not to cast his vote for Donald Trump despite his state handedly voting for the president-elect.

Advertisement

Mr. Suprun explained his reasoning in an op-ed for the New York Times released yesterday.

“The election of the next president is not yet a done deal. Electors of conscience can still do the right thing for the good of the country. Presidential electors have the legal right and a constitutional duty to vote their conscience. I believe electors should unify behind a Republican alternative, an honorable and qualified man or woman such as Gov. John Kasich of Ohio. I pray my fellow electors will do their job and join with me in discovering who that person should be.”

Before reaching this conclusion, Suprun listed several things that he has issue with Trump on: claiming he lacks foreign policy experience, incites violence at his rallies, picked a flawed candidate in Gen. Michael Flynn for national security advisor, and believes he will face ethics issues in office due to his business ties.

If Suprun follows through on his promise on December 19, he will be the first “faithless elector” since 2004.

Besides him, there is a sizable group of electors who plan to vote for Ohio Gov. Kasich. However, these “Hamilton electors" are apparently mostly members who are supposed to be voting for Clinton anyways. They come from Washington State and Colorado. I am not too sure how this is supposed to make sense, but this is their plan and they are actively trying to pick up members such as Suprun who are designated to vote for Trump.

Advertisement

It goes without saying this sets a terrible precedent for American democracy. Only a small group of electors appear to be taking part in this disregard for the election process, but what about the next presidential election? Could this act set in motion a future where large swaths of “faithless electors” become a regularity and put our Electoral College in complete disarray?

Perhaps Suprun and others should resign like one elector did if they can’t do their job.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement