NYPD Arrests Dozens Who Besieged Area Near Chuck Schumer's Home
White House Insists Biden Has Been 'Very Clear' About His Position on Pro-Hamas...
Mika Says Florida Is Dangerous for Women…From Her Florida Beach House
Adding to the Title IX Law
‘Hush Money’ Case Against Trump Is Bad On The Law and On the...
Israel-Hamas War: Has Hamas Bet Correctly?
NPR Whistleblower Highlights Everything Wrong With Journalism Today
NYT Claims Trump Is Getting 'Favorable Treatment' from the NYPD
Texas Doesn't Take Passive Approach to Anti-Israel Mobs
Columbia Prof Who Called to Defund the Police, Now Wants Police to Protect...
Pelosi's Daughter Criticizes J6 Judges Who are 'Out for Blood' After Handing Down...
Mike Johnson Addresses Anti-Israel Hate As Hundreds Harass the School’s Jewish Community
DeSantis May Not Be Facing Biden in November, but Still Offers Perfect Response...
Lawmakers in One State Pass Legislation to Allow Teachers to Carry Guns in...
UnitedHealth Has Too Much Power
Tipsheet

War Number Four

It turns out that Libya is not the third war that the US is engaged in, but the fourth. Number three would be Yemen, since 2009:

The United States is intensifying airstrikes in strife-torn Yemen, where Washington has been conducting a covert war in an attempt to help the government there combat a growing rebel threat.

In particular, The New York Times said, the U.S. has increased drone attacks in recent weeks as well as airstrikes using traditional fighter jets, as growing rebel resistance poses a mounting threat to the Sana government, a U.S. ally.

...

Total U.S. involvement in Yemen has been one of the Obama administration's best-kept secrets, the Times said, after President Ali Abdullah Saleh authorized limited American involvement in 2009.

Advertisement

This won't encourage Yemeni citizens to hate us more at all.

What happened to Obama's claim that he would bring troops home? What about Joe Biden's bold statement that presidents who engage in war without prior approval of Congress should be impeached? Either this was political opportunism, riding on liberal anti-Bush sentiment from the beginning, or these supposed peaceniks were overcome by the desire for power once they assumed executive positions. Neither bodes well.

And what about the anti-war left? Given how much they howled about a war that Congress did sign off on, shouldn't a secret war mean that it's time to dust off the pitchforks again? At the time, it sounded like they elected Obama partially because he campaigned on an anti-war platform. Apparently meeting constitutional requirements is not enough for a Republican president, but for a Democrat, even secret wars are justifed.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement