Here Are the Charges Nick Reiner Faces in the Deaths of Rob and...
Trump Administration Just Made a Huge Move Against Drug Cartels
Dear New York Times: Jane Austen Does Not Need ‘X-Rated’ Help to Endure
Australia Dropped the Gun Control Ball With the Bondi Beach Terrorist
Are Democrats Getting Desperate About Epstein?
Why Johnny Can't Read
U.S. Military Strikes Three More Narco-Terrorist Vessels in the Eastern Pacific
Trans-Marine Veteran Arrested in Connection to New Years Eve Terror Plot: Said He...
President Trump Orders a Full Blockade of Sanctioned Venezuelan Oil Tankers
You Won't Believe What the Minneapolis Police Chief Invoked to Defend Illegal Immigrants
18 States Sue Trump Administration Over $100K H-1B Visa Fee, Calling It 'Unlawful'
These RINO Senators Backed a Bill Seeking to Overturn Trump Executive Order on...
Bondi Beach Horror Sparks Fiery Criticism From Holocaust Survivor’s Daughter, Injured in T...
Jewish Couple Killed Trying to Stop Gunman: The First Victims of the Antisemitic...
HHS Opens Investigation Into Minnesota Fraud
Tipsheet

Mixed Signals?

Yesterday the Obama Administration announced, via the DOJ that they will no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act. I'm skeptical.

First of all, the Administration defended DOMA for two years, and Eric Holder's explanation of the change is weak at best (one challenge in the Second Circuit changes the DOJ's entire stance on the issue?). In an interview with Salon.com, constitutional law professor Jonathan Turley
Advertisement
says, "It's not very persuasive to say that the administration has suddenly concluded that DOMA is unconstitutional. The more obvious explanation is that it didn't feel it could politically oppose DOMA before the midterm elections. I found Holder's statement to be rather forced and unconvincing."

I might be more convinced if the DOJ were not planning to "remain party to the cases and continue to represent the interests of the United States throughout the litigation" of two pending cases in which they were previously defending DOMA.

Second, this isn't the first time the DOJ has announced that they will no longer defend a law with which they disagree. Eric Holder announced more than once that the Department of Justice would not target marijuana use in states whose laws conflicted with federal laws. In spite of these claims, the DOJ
Advertisement
never stopped enforcing federal drug laws .  We've seen this show before.

So they aren't repealing DOMA. They are just refusing to defend it. My guess is that, like it did with federal drug laws, the Administration will quietly continue the previous policy, while hoping that this announcement is enough to please the necessary voting blocs. Sounds more like weak capitulation than an actual change in policy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos