President Trump Is Right About Tim Walz
Jewish Parents Furious at School Over Muslim Club's Pro-Hamas Display
Guess How Many Democrats Voted Against Protecting Our Schools From Chinese Influence
Trump Was Right to Slam the Brakes on Fuel-Efficiency Standards
Damning Watchdog Report Reveals 'Large-Scale Systemic Failures' Leading to Obamacare Subsi...
Occam's Bazooka
Tech Billionaire Drops $6.25 Billion Donation to Jump-Start Trump Accounts for 25 Million...
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 297: Biblical Time Keeping – BC and AD...
The Dangerous Joy of Christmas: Standing With Persecuted Christians This Season
America First, Christian Nationalism, and Antisemitism
Illegal Alien, Son Arrested for Allegedly Trafficking 75 Firearms
Man Who Set Fire To Train With Victim Inside Face 40 Years in...
Former High-Level DEA Official Charged With Narcoterrorism in Alleged Plot to Aid CJNG...
Florida Man Convicted of Attempted Murder of Two Federal Officers in ATF Raid
DOJ Settlement Forces Constellation to Sell Six Power Plants in $26.6B Calpine Merger
Tipsheet

Pledge of Allegiance on Trial in Massachusetts

The State Supreme Court of Massachusetts will begin hearing arguments this week in a case where an atheist couple is looking to strike the words “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance, which their kids say at school every day.

Advertisement

The American Humanist Association is arguing on behalf of the Acton family. On the other side, the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty is working to represent the school district. The suit was filed anonymously in order to protect their children, but it looks like these special interest groups from DC are looking to get in on the argument.

The American Humanist Association says that the pledge’s “wording strongly favoring one religious class while disfavoring the plaintiffs’ religious class” is out of line. But just last year the Middlesex Superior Court ruled that “’under God’ does not convert the exercise into prayer,” that the children can choose not to say the pledge, and that the inclusion of “under god” did not violate the childrens’ rights.

Congress added those words to the pledge in 1954 and this is not the first time someone has tried to challenge this wording. This case could be decided in a month or as long as a year. Religious liberty is at stake here.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement