Joe Scarborough Really Stretched the Limits of Sanity With This Take on the...
Fiasco: NYC GOP Councilwoman Just Obliterated Mamdani Over the City's Shambolic Winter Sto...
CBS News Peddled Fake News About Bad Bunny and ICE Post-Super Bowl Performance
Yes, This Was the Best Response to John Kasich's Tweet About the Super...
A Bar Patron Had a Total Meltdown During the Super Bowl. The Reason...
Maybe We Should Be Glad Bad Bunny Performed in Spanish
Notice Where This Ex-ESPN Reporter's Attempt to Mock Conservatives Over Bad Bunny Laughabl...
We Must Not Submit to 'Diversity'
A Maryland Squatter Walks Free — and Here's What Her Attorney Had...
AWFUL Who Harassed Yoga Studio Employees Over ICE Earned Herself a Ban
Deadline Tries to Guilt Trip John Lithgow for Starring in HBO's 'Harry Potter'...
Mayor Mamdani Becomes First NYC Leader to Skip Archbishop Installation in Almost a...
When Canadians Were Actually Funny
The Student ICE Walkouts Are a Troubling Reminder of How Revolutionaries Are Made
America’s Security Doesn’t End at the Ice’s Edge
Tipsheet

Pledge of Allegiance on Trial in Massachusetts

The State Supreme Court of Massachusetts will begin hearing arguments this week in a case where an atheist couple is looking to strike the words “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance, which their kids say at school every day.

Advertisement

The American Humanist Association is arguing on behalf of the Acton family. On the other side, the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty is working to represent the school district. The suit was filed anonymously in order to protect their children, but it looks like these special interest groups from DC are looking to get in on the argument.

The American Humanist Association says that the pledge’s “wording strongly favoring one religious class while disfavoring the plaintiffs’ religious class” is out of line. But just last year the Middlesex Superior Court ruled that “’under God’ does not convert the exercise into prayer,” that the children can choose not to say the pledge, and that the inclusion of “under god” did not violate the childrens’ rights.

Congress added those words to the pledge in 1954 and this is not the first time someone has tried to challenge this wording. This case could be decided in a month or as long as a year. Religious liberty is at stake here.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos