CBS Removes Trans Mandates From Its Reporting; NY Times Accuses War Crimes With...
Anti-ICE Protesters Try to Shame an Agent — It Backfires Spectacularly
For the Trans Activist Class, It’s All About Them
Ilhan Omar Claims ICE Isn’t Arresting Criminals. Here's Proof That She's Lying.
Check Out President Trump's 'Appropriate and Unambiguous' Response to Heckler
'The Constitution of a Deity' RFK Jr. on President Trump's Diet
Father-in-Law of Renee Good Refuses to Blame ICE, Urges Americans to Turn to...
Iranian State Media Airs a Direct Assassination Threat Against President Trump
US Halts Immigrant Visas From 75 Countries Over Welfare Abuse Concerns
Tricia McLaughlin Defends ICE's Visible Presence
California Man Pleads Guilty to Laundering Over $1.5M and Evading Taxes on $4M
House Committee IT Staffer Charged With Stealing 240 Government Phones Worth $150K
Justice Department Challenges Minnesota’s Affirmative Action Hiring Requirements
Founder of LGBTQ+ Nonprofit Casa Ruby Sentenced in Federal Fraud Case
DC Rapper 'Taliban Glizzy' Sentenced to Over 18 Years for Multi-State Jewelry Heists
Tipsheet
Premium

Harris Surrogate: We Expect the 'News' Media to Do Our Explaining for Us, Thanks

AP Photo/Julia Nikhinson

A very revealing comment, and a window into the Democratic psyche.  This attitude is arrogant and entitled, of course, but it may not be misplaced.  Democrats have learned quite well that many journalists are either functionally or openly propagandists for their side, and they will effectively do as they're told.  The unelected, replacement Democratic presidential nominee doing zero interviews for a full month?  Such joy.  The nominee announcing a new round of radical policies, having walked away from many of her previous ones with no explanation?  

That's fine, one of the campaign's surrogates told a major news outlet, you'll do that work for us, thanks.  Is he wrong?


That trust is well-earned, thanks to many years of slavish water-carrying.  It's true that Kamala Harris received some media pushback for her Soviet-style price controls scheme, which marked something of a departure from the weeks-long adulation festival Harris had been enjoying.  But it's telling that her top advocates feel comfortable simply laughing off reasonable questions -- even if they're framed as tepidly as possible:


Forget "better explain."  How about explain at all?  Whitmer's response is a snide chuckle and an immediate pivot to attacking the Trump campaign.  Unresponsive. I suppose Harris did finally attempt to explain one of her economic policies (after the Meet the Press interview embedded above aired).  The result:


A one minute answer, four vague uses of the term "return on investment," capped off with the ludicrous claim that her new trillion-dollar-plus agenda items (on top of all her other runaway spending, completed and proposed) will 'pay for themselves.'  They absolutely will not.  Remarkable:


Perhaps Heinrich didn't get the message that Harris' policy is joy and vibes.  On that score, I'll leave you with this vapid pablum, which she evidently believes is profound and insightful.  New 'unburdened by what has been' just dropped:

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos