Don't Miss Our MASSIVE State of the Union VIP Sale
Trump Won’t Say It Out Loud but His Team Thinks They Know Who...
You'll Never Guess How the Authorities Found and Killed Cartel Leader El Mencho
OpenAI Flagged Canada Mass Shooter for Violent Content, but Didn't Contact the Authorities
Tony Evers Just Sold Wisconsin Out to the World Health Organization
A Tempest in a Locker Room: Taking a Sober Look at Kash Patel’s...
The Press Ignores an Assassination Attempt As the Huffington Post Takes the Gold...
The Atlantic Thinks Republicans Have a 'Nazi Problem'
Proof that Anti-Gun Group Cares About Control, Not Safety
Social Media Erupts After HuffPost Questions National Pride at the Winter Olympics
Here's How the Supreme Court's Tariff Ruling Exposes Liberal Justices Desire to Expand...
The Violence in Mexico Vindicates Trump’s Push to Treat Drug Cartels As Terrorists...
Gavin Newsom Doubles Down on His Racist Comments: It's 'Fake F**king Outrage'
The Women's Hockey Team Snubbed Trump's SOTU Invite
Limited Government, Lasting Opportunity
Tipsheet
Premium

Harris Surrogate: We Expect the 'News' Media to Do Our Explaining for Us, Thanks

Harris Surrogate: We Expect the 'News' Media to Do Our Explaining for Us, Thanks
AP Photo/Julia Nikhinson

A very revealing comment, and a window into the Democratic psyche.  This attitude is arrogant and entitled, of course, but it may not be misplaced.  Democrats have learned quite well that many journalists are either functionally or openly propagandists for their side, and they will effectively do as they're told.  The unelected, replacement Democratic presidential nominee doing zero interviews for a full month?  Such joy.  The nominee announcing a new round of radical policies, having walked away from many of her previous ones with no explanation?  

That's fine, one of the campaign's surrogates told a major news outlet, you'll do that work for us, thanks.  Is he wrong?


That trust is well-earned, thanks to many years of slavish water-carrying.  It's true that Kamala Harris received some media pushback for her Soviet-style price controls scheme, which marked something of a departure from the weeks-long adulation festival Harris had been enjoying.  But it's telling that her top advocates feel comfortable simply laughing off reasonable questions -- even if they're framed as tepidly as possible:


Forget "better explain."  How about explain at all?  Whitmer's response is a snide chuckle and an immediate pivot to attacking the Trump campaign.  Unresponsive. I suppose Harris did finally attempt to explain one of her economic policies (after the Meet the Press interview embedded above aired).  The result:


A one minute answer, four vague uses of the term "return on investment," capped off with the ludicrous claim that her new trillion-dollar-plus agenda items (on top of all her other runaway spending, completed and proposed) will 'pay for themselves.'  They absolutely will not.  Remarkable:


Perhaps Heinrich didn't get the message that Harris' policy is joy and vibes.  On that score, I'll leave you with this vapid pablum, which she evidently believes is profound and insightful.  New 'unburdened by what has been' just dropped:

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement