Politico With the Weakest Scoop on Lindsey Graham's Replacement
With Extreme Poverty at All-Time Lows, Democratic Socialists Hope to Reverse the Trend
After Ousting Graham Platner in Maine, Bernie Sanders Says President Trump Doesn't Believe...
Representation Matters in Movies, Right Up Until It Doesn't
Did Jon Ossoff Really Say This About Liberty and Supporting ICE?
CNBC Lists the Ten 'Worst' States to Live In. See If You Can...
The New York Times Explainer for Its Catch-and-Kill Report to Benefit Graham Platner
To Democrats, the Economy Is Just One Massive Jobs Program
These Three Arizona Democrats Are Backed by the Soros Family
World Cup Star Erling Haaland Made Some Hilarious Texan Purchases Before His Return...
Iranian Drones in Cuba? Here's What Trump Knows.
Rents Hit All-Time High in Mamdani's NYC As Millionaires Make Mass Exodus
Iran Launches Strikes Against Maritime Vessels in the Strait of Hormuz
Twelve Democrat States Block Paramount Merge with Warner Bros
A Grand Prix Race Heads to DC – But It Wasn't An Easy...
Tipsheet
Premium

Harris Surrogate: We Expect the 'News' Media to Do Our Explaining for Us, Thanks

Harris Surrogate: We Expect the 'News' Media to Do Our Explaining for Us, Thanks
AP Photo/Julia Nikhinson

A very revealing comment, and a window into the Democratic psyche.  This attitude is arrogant and entitled, of course, but it may not be misplaced.  Democrats have learned quite well that many journalists are either functionally or openly propagandists for their side, and they will effectively do as they're told.  The unelected, replacement Democratic presidential nominee doing zero interviews for a full month?  Such joy.  The nominee announcing a new round of radical policies, having walked away from many of her previous ones with no explanation?  

That's fine, one of the campaign's surrogates told a major news outlet, you'll do that work for us, thanks.  Is he wrong?


That trust is well-earned, thanks to many years of slavish water-carrying.  It's true that Kamala Harris received some media pushback for her Soviet-style price controls scheme, which marked something of a departure from the weeks-long adulation festival Harris had been enjoying.  But it's telling that her top advocates feel comfortable simply laughing off reasonable questions -- even if they're framed as tepidly as possible:


Forget "better explain."  How about explain at all?  Whitmer's response is a snide chuckle and an immediate pivot to attacking the Trump campaign.  Unresponsive. I suppose Harris did finally attempt to explain one of her economic policies (after the Meet the Press interview embedded above aired).  The result:


A one minute answer, four vague uses of the term "return on investment," capped off with the ludicrous claim that her new trillion-dollar-plus agenda items (on top of all her other runaway spending, completed and proposed) will 'pay for themselves.'  They absolutely will not.  Remarkable:


Perhaps Heinrich didn't get the message that Harris' policy is joy and vibes.  On that score, I'll leave you with this vapid pablum, which she evidently believes is profound and insightful.  New 'unburdened by what has been' just dropped:

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement