We Have the Results of Trump's Cognitive Score
Why the Washington Nationals Just Fired One of Their Executives. Hint: It's Woke...
Japan Overhauled Its Entire Intelligence Community...and One Nation Is Not Happy About It
NY Gov Tried to Dunk on Trump About the Knicks, and Failed Miserably
Why This Milwaukee Brewers Pitcher Got a One-Game Suspension. It Was Pretty Damn...
Weren't Democrats Opposed to 'Christian Nationalism'?
Jefferson on How to Restore the Republic
NJ Man Charged After Allegedly Biting, Kicking ICE Officers at Newark Detention Facility
James Talarico's Campaign Website Reveals His Radical Immigration Desires
Stephen Colbert's Failed Comedy Act Was Bleeding CBS Dry
EXCLUSIVE: James Talarico's Influence Helped Secure His Vegan Girlfriend a Tax-Payer Funde...
EXCLUSIVE: Karen Bass Is in 'Serious Jeopardy' of Losing Mayoral Race, Poll Suggests
United Flight Forced to Land After Attempted Hijacking
How AI Threatens to Destroy the Core Self and How to Fight Back
Mission Laundering: What the OpenAI Verdict Didn't Resolve
Tipsheet
Premium

Harris Surrogate: We Expect the 'News' Media to Do Our Explaining for Us, Thanks

Harris Surrogate: We Expect the 'News' Media to Do Our Explaining for Us, Thanks
AP Photo/Julia Nikhinson

A very revealing comment, and a window into the Democratic psyche.  This attitude is arrogant and entitled, of course, but it may not be misplaced.  Democrats have learned quite well that many journalists are either functionally or openly propagandists for their side, and they will effectively do as they're told.  The unelected, replacement Democratic presidential nominee doing zero interviews for a full month?  Such joy.  The nominee announcing a new round of radical policies, having walked away from many of her previous ones with no explanation?  

That's fine, one of the campaign's surrogates told a major news outlet, you'll do that work for us, thanks.  Is he wrong?


That trust is well-earned, thanks to many years of slavish water-carrying.  It's true that Kamala Harris received some media pushback for her Soviet-style price controls scheme, which marked something of a departure from the weeks-long adulation festival Harris had been enjoying.  But it's telling that her top advocates feel comfortable simply laughing off reasonable questions -- even if they're framed as tepidly as possible:


Forget "better explain."  How about explain at all?  Whitmer's response is a snide chuckle and an immediate pivot to attacking the Trump campaign.  Unresponsive. I suppose Harris did finally attempt to explain one of her economic policies (after the Meet the Press interview embedded above aired).  The result:


A one minute answer, four vague uses of the term "return on investment," capped off with the ludicrous claim that her new trillion-dollar-plus agenda items (on top of all her other runaway spending, completed and proposed) will 'pay for themselves.'  They absolutely will not.  Remarkable:


Perhaps Heinrich didn't get the message that Harris' policy is joy and vibes.  On that score, I'll leave you with this vapid pablum, which she evidently believes is profound and insightful.  New 'unburdened by what has been' just dropped:

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement