Liberal Supreme Court Justice Got Smacked Down During Arguments Over Mail-in Ballots
A Chicago Alderwoman Victim Blames US Student Who Was Shot and Killed By...
The Dems' Uber-Gerrymandered VA Map Is in Peril
Even CNN Is Forced to Admit That ICE Deployed at Airports Have Slashed...
A Man With No Arms or Legs Shot Someone. Yeah, I Have Questions,...
American Hostage Dennis Coyle Has Been Freed From Taliban Captivity in Afghanistan
Watch How Democratic Senate Candidate Janet Mills Acts When Asked About Lying for...
Jon Ossoff Hikes Rent on His Single-Family Home While Criticizing Corporations for Doing...
Thanks to ICE, Wait Times in Atlanta's Airport Security Lines Have Dropped Dramatically
Illegal Alien From Mexico Arrested for Attempted Murder in Salt Lake City
Senator Chris Murphy Told the Nation Who Democrats Really Care About, and It...
What Does Victory Look Like?
Tom Homan Blasts Sen. Cory Booker for Fearmongering As ICE Is Deployed to...
Trump’s Trifecta: Advancement for America and Setbacks for China
The Decisive Gamble That Could Topple Tehran
Tipsheet
Premium

Harris Surrogate: We Expect the 'News' Media to Do Our Explaining for Us, Thanks

Harris Surrogate: We Expect the 'News' Media to Do Our Explaining for Us, Thanks
AP Photo/Julia Nikhinson

A very revealing comment, and a window into the Democratic psyche.  This attitude is arrogant and entitled, of course, but it may not be misplaced.  Democrats have learned quite well that many journalists are either functionally or openly propagandists for their side, and they will effectively do as they're told.  The unelected, replacement Democratic presidential nominee doing zero interviews for a full month?  Such joy.  The nominee announcing a new round of radical policies, having walked away from many of her previous ones with no explanation?  

That's fine, one of the campaign's surrogates told a major news outlet, you'll do that work for us, thanks.  Is he wrong?


That trust is well-earned, thanks to many years of slavish water-carrying.  It's true that Kamala Harris received some media pushback for her Soviet-style price controls scheme, which marked something of a departure from the weeks-long adulation festival Harris had been enjoying.  But it's telling that her top advocates feel comfortable simply laughing off reasonable questions -- even if they're framed as tepidly as possible:


Forget "better explain."  How about explain at all?  Whitmer's response is a snide chuckle and an immediate pivot to attacking the Trump campaign.  Unresponsive. I suppose Harris did finally attempt to explain one of her economic policies (after the Meet the Press interview embedded above aired).  The result:


A one minute answer, four vague uses of the term "return on investment," capped off with the ludicrous claim that her new trillion-dollar-plus agenda items (on top of all her other runaway spending, completed and proposed) will 'pay for themselves.'  They absolutely will not.  Remarkable:


Perhaps Heinrich didn't get the message that Harris' policy is joy and vibes.  On that score, I'll leave you with this vapid pablum, which she evidently believes is profound and insightful.  New 'unburdened by what has been' just dropped:

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement