Joe Scarborough Really Stretched the Limits of Sanity With This Take on the...
Fiasco: NYC GOP Councilwoman Just Obliterated Mamdani Over the City's Shambolic Winter Sto...
CBS News Peddled Fake News About Bad Bunny and ICE Post-Super Bowl Performance
Yes, This Was the Best Response to John Kasich's Tweet About the Super...
A Bar Patron Had a Total Meltdown During the Super Bowl. The Reason...
Maybe We Should Be Glad Bad Bunny Performed in Spanish
Notice Where This Ex-ESPN Reporter's Attempt to Mock Conservatives Over Bad Bunny Laughabl...
Why Are Americans Fleeing Blue States for Red States?
A Maryland Squatter Walks Free — and Here's What Her Attorney Had...
AWFUL Who Harassed Yoga Studio Employees Over ICE Earned Herself a Ban
Deadline Tries to Guilt Trip John Lithgow for Starring in HBO's 'Harry Potter'...
Mayor Mamdani Becomes First NYC Leader to Skip Archbishop Installation in Almost a...
When Canadians Were Actually Funny
The Student ICE Walkouts Are a Troubling Reminder of How Revolutionaries Are Made
America’s Security Doesn’t End at the Ice’s Edge
Tipsheet

Here We Go: 'Pro-Israel' Democrats Start to Waffle on Israel's Self Defense

AP Photo/Susan Walsh, Pool

In the immediate aftermath of the hell on earth visited upon Israeli civilians by Iran-backed Hamas terrorists, most Democrats in Washington -- aside from the predictable fanatical Israel haters and bigots -- talked a strong game about Israel's right to self defense.  Many of us warned that although such statements of solidarity were nice, the real test would lie in the days and weeks ahead.  Once the initial shock of the massacre wore off, and Israel's military was grinding through a brutal war to destroy Hamas, how long would the support truly last?  Here we are, less than four weeks past the single largest one-day mass murder of Jews since the Holocaust, and the President of the United States is calling for a temporary "pause" in the IDF's offensive, supposedly for 'humanitarian' reasons.  Not only that, he's threatening to veto crucial military aid to Israel if it's not paired with money for Ukraine:  

Advertisement


I personally support helping both of these allies in their fights for survival against anti-American enemies, but this is not a time to play games.  If there's a case to make for both batches of funding (and I believe there is), make each case, and vote on them separately.  Don't let Israel twist in the wind while Ukraine-related politics in the US bogs down the debate.  It's reckless and unacceptable, but that appears to be the route most Congressional Democrats are headed, too.  Only a dozen members of the allegedly pro-Israel House Democratic minority voted to pass the GOP's stand-alone Israel bill, with IRS-related offsets.  Democratic leaders in the House and Senate are arguing that they'd rather not send any help to Israel if it means a separate vote on Ukraine funding and less money for the recently-doubled IRS.  

Worse, ostensible Israel supporters in the upper chamber are already going wobbly on Israel's war against Hamas.  A member of leadership has now publicly embraced a Hamas-boosting "ceasefire," while other prominent liberal Senator is hand-wringing about the civilian casualties that Hamas both directly causes and habitually exaggerates.  MSNBC primetime hosts are prattling about 'disproportionality,' even after Israel delayed its incursion by weeks ands done everything imaginable to urge civilians to evacuate the north of Gaza.  For some, We Stand With Israel lasted a few weeks, and really just days once the actual fighting started.  With "allies" like these...

Advertisement


I added, "don’t get me started on the mind-numbing 'disproportional' idiocy. And although, horribly, Gaza civilians are dying (Hamas’ fault), taking Hamas’ death toll stats seriously is absurd. Recall the “500” innocents who didn’t die in the hospital that wasn’t bombed by not Israel."  How can any fair-minded person, and especially someone purporting to be a defender of Israel, look at details like this and decide that the solution is for Israel to let up, or show 'restraint,' or bear some moral burden?  This is who's responsible for the plight of innocent Palestinians:

Advertisement


As mentioned in my first tweet above, have these people forgotten about what a Hamas leader said just this week?


There's no ambiguity in any of that.  Here's what another Hamas official said about civilians, dismissing their importance:


There is no "ceasefire" or "peace deal" possible with genocidal maniacs who plainly don't care even about the lives of their own people.  I'll leave you with yet another glaring double standard within the 'international community' that exposes the obsession with, and different rules applied to the lone, tiny Jewish state on earth -- better known as anti-Semitism:

Advertisement


And a flash of anguished truth, quickly suppressed:


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos