Armed Suspect Shot After Holding Bank Customers Hostage for 15 Hours
Trump Just Confirmed What We Already Knew About J6
That Crazy Leftist Wisconsin Brewery Owner Will Not Be on November's Ballot
Every WI Democrat Running for Governor Would Repeal Act 10, and Here's What...
New Jersey Mayor Ras Baraka Says What Democrats Really Want to Do With...
James Talarico Compares Unborn Children to Parasites
The Left's War on America's 250th
'60 Minutes' Staffers Are Mad Scott Pelley Was Fired for Insubordination
Abby Phillip Lectures Guests About Democrats' Fears President Trump Will Interfere in the...
The Forgotten Room Heroes
Lawsuit Against New Jersey in Gun Confiscation Suit Expands
Trump Just Confirmed His Heated Phone Call With Benjamin Netanyahu
Here's the Latest From California’s Primary Elections
Meet the Democrat With Al-Qaeda Ties Who Just Won a Congressional Primary
Spencer Pratt Declares He's 'Born For This' After Rough Election Night For Karen...
Tipsheet

Brutal: Ben Shapiro Crushes Piers Morgan on the First Amendment

Brutal: Ben Shapiro Crushes Piers Morgan on the First Amendment

Piers Morgan -- a citizen of the country America defeated in two wars to gain and retain our independence -- keeps telling Americans that our constitution is deficient.  His usual target is the Second Amendment, but these days, he's going after the First Amendment, as well.  In the wake of Charlottesville, Morgan's solution to hate speech is to ban it by amending and limiting free speech protections:

Advertisement


Conservative writer Ben Shapiro was having none of it, touching off this Twitter exchange, which predictably ended poorly for the pompous Brit.  After Shapiro corrected his bad misrepresentation and ignorance of relevant caselaw, Morgan claimed to know more about the constitution than the Harvard-trained attorney.  Things went downhill from there:

Advertisement


This was an exceptionally stupid insult from Morgan because Shapiro resigned from Breitbart in protest, then built his own (rather successful) company.  Ben finished him:


Oof.  Anyway, on the topic that started that argument, the Los Angeles Times is out with a strong editorial arguing against constraining the First Amendment's capacious protections of speech and expression, including safeguarding loathsome people and their ideas:

The vast majority of Americans would sooner have their communities hit by a plague of locusts than by the torch-bearing racists who invaded Charlottesville. Nevertheless, it is vitally important to recognize that people are constitutionally free to hold them even the most deplorable views, and to express them as well. Counter-protesters, for their part, are equally entitled to say clearly and forcefully that racism, anti-Semitism and similar beliefs that denigrate or deny the humanity of others have no place in our society. Neither side, however, has a right to start throwing punches. Nor should the mere risk of such violence be used as pretext for denying people the ability to exercise their right to free speech or assembly. These exceptionally American notions seem lost on some of our leaders. A case in point: Several elected officials have asked the federal government to withdraw a permit for an Aug. 26 rally at San Francisco’s Crissy Field organized by Patriot Prayer, a Portland-based group of right-wing provocateurs. That is the exactly wrong approach. Denying permits in order to shut down speech that is offensive or so controversial that it might provoke a violent backlash is the act of an autocratic government...It is in fractious times like these that we must hold firmest to constitutional principles.

Advertisement

Read the entire thing.  I'll leave you with a flashback to Shapiro dismantling Morgan on guns:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement