Online Lib Lawyers: Dumb or Lying?
Hey, National Republicans, Should Look at How the TN GOP Handled Business
CNN Analyst Delivered a BIG Reality Check for Dems Yesterday
Dems Are Looking to Redistrict Delaware. There's Only One Problem.
John Thune Is Reminding Republican Voters Why He Sucks
A Louisiana Restaurant Shut Down Permanently Over What Lurked in Its Walk-in Freezer
South Carolina's State Senate Leader Said What Now About Why He's Against...
Bad Medicine Could Be in Store for MI's El-Sayed Over Issues Concerning His...
NBC News Tried Invoking 'Experts' to Fearmonger About Hantavirus and It Backfired
Oh, Look: Another Minneapolis Grocery Store Owner Has Been Busted for SNAP Fraud
We Just Learned More About the Man Hit by a Frontier Airlines Plane,...
TN State Rep. Justin Pearson Is Not Happy He Faced Consequences for His...
Scott Jennings Schools Dem Strategist on GOP Redistricting
The Greatest Time to Be Alive in America Is Right Now
Retirement Options for the Middle Class
Tipsheet

Harry Reid: Hey, Let's Ditch the Filibuster

Harry Reid: Hey, Let's Ditch the Filibuster

He's bitter, you see, because Republicans want to pay for the student loan interest rate fix (the very need for which is Democrats' own doing) with spending offsets, rather than his party's tax-hike-and-raid-Medicare scheme. Couple that frustration with Sen. Jon Kyl's irritating insistence on offering amendments to another bill, and Reid appeared ready to go nuclear:
 

Advertisement

 

"If there were ever anything that needed changing in this body, it's the filibuster rule, because it's been abused, abused, and abused."


Interestingly, when Reid's minority posse was actually abusing the judicial filibuster in the mid-2000's, they defended their inviolable right to obstruct President Bush's appointees with indignant hysteria:
 


They gang's all there: Obama, Biden, Hillary, Reid, etc.  I especially enjoy Sen. Feinstein's ominous comment around the two-minute mark, warning that if Republicans had succeeded in abolishing the judicial filibuster (a move ultimately averted by the "Gang of 14" compromise), one day they might even come after the super-sacred legislative filibuster.  Which is precisely what Reid effectively endorsed about today.  I can't help but wonder if he'll instantly change his tune if Republicans net, say, four Senate seats in November.  Here's a handy preview of what the Senate's foremost cowboy poetry enthusiast could conceivably argue in defense of the filibuster rule as soon as Republicans reclaim the majority:
 

The Senate was not established to be efficient. Sometimes the rules get in the way of efficiency. The Senate was established to make sure that minorities are protected. Majorities can always protect themselves, but minorities cannot. That is what the Senate is all about. For more than 200 years, the rules of the Senate have protected the American people, and rightfully so. The need to muster 60 votes in order to terminate Senate debate naturally frustrates the majority and oftentimes the minority. I am sure it will frustrate me when I assume the office of majority leader in a few weeks. But I recognize this requirement is a tool that serves the long-term interest of the Senate and the American people and our country.

Advertisement

Related:

HARRY REID


In case you were curious, those were Reid's verbatim thoughts on the matter last time he was in the minority.  Parting thought: Was Reid just blowing off steam in the clip above, or is he actually gearing up to nuke minority rights?  Given that the Republican House remains a buffer to much Congressional nonsense, I'd guess the former.  But then again, Reid has abandoned decades of precedent and comity in favor of a raw power grab before.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos