'This Is Where the Systematic Killing Took Place': 200 Days of War From...
White House Insists Biden Has Been 'Very Clear' About His Position on Pro-Hamas...
Watch Biden Lose the Battle With His Teleprompter Again
Thanks, Biden! Here's How Iran Is Still Making Billions to Fund Terrorism
Texas Doesn't Take Passive Approach to Anti-Israel Mobs
Columbia Prof Who Called to Defund the Police, Now Wants Police to Protect...
Pelosi's Daughter Criticizes J6 Judges Who are 'Out for Blood' After Handing Down...
Mike Johnson Addresses Anti-Israel Hate As Hundreds Harass the School’s Jewish Community
DeSantis May Not Be Facing Biden in November, but Still Offers Perfect Response...
Lawmakers in One State Pass Legislation to Allow Teachers to Carry Guns in...
UnitedHealth Has Too Much Power
Former Democratic Rep. Who Lost to John Fetterman Sure Doesn't Like the Senator...
Biden Rewrote Title IX to Protect 'Trans' People. Here's How Somes States Responded.
Watch: Joe Biden's Latest Flub Is Laugh-Out-Loud Funny
Hundreds of Athletes Urge the NCAA to Allow Men to Compete Against Women
Tipsheet

Video: Rand Paul Defends Tea Party, Hammers Big Government

Kentucky's junior Senator offered a plain-spoken defense of the Tea Party and the principles of limited government in a floor speech last night.  Let's try an experiment for a moment; close your eyes and listen to this speech as if you've never heard of Rand Paul or the Tea Party movement.  From his common-sense arithmetic, to his assessment of our involvement in Libya, to his acknowledgment of bipartisan culpability in feeding the debt crisis, Paul's comments sound pretty darn straightforward and sensible.  I have a hunch that these remarks would appeal to a broad swath of American voters, including many with no affiliation with, or affinity for, the Tea Party movement.  Thoughts?
Advertisement



While we're on the subject of Senators and common sense, Jeff Sessions -- the ranking Republican on the Senate Budget Committee -- has a modest proposal for President Obama: Since the White House has essentially tossed out the 2012 budget it introduced two months ago in favor of a nebulous new "vision," why not draw up...a new budget to codify and flesh out this new framework?  If Obama is going to cynically and dishonestly savage Paul Ryan's concrete budget plan for political gain, the least he can do is offer a tangible alternative.  How about it, Mr. President?


Oh, that's right.  The president has already announced he's (again) delegating the hard work of governing to (another) bipartisan committee, this time led valiantly by The Vice President of the United Stazzzzzzzzzzzzzz.


UPDATE - You don't say:  Well over half of the president's new proposed "savings" come from higher taxes, not the spending cuts he promised on Wednesday.  Some people will gripe that this study was conducted by Goldman Sachs -- a big, evil Wall Street corporation that
Advertisement
of course would lie about Obama.  After all, they've funneled massive political donations to...oh wait.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement