Joe Biden's Chaotic Israel Position Isn't an Accident. It's Primed for Something Sinister.
Saudi Arabia Publicly Acknowledges It Helped Defend Israel This Weekend
Why Trump Went Off on the Judge Presiding Over His Hush Money Trial
Water Is Wet, NPR Is Liberal And Other Obvious Things
We Dare Not Tempt Them With Weakness
Communists Betray Workers, Teachers Unions Betray Students, Civil Rights Organizations Bet...
The Politics of Steel Are Center Stage in Pennsylvania
A Taxing Time
Joe Biden on the Economy: I Don't Feel Your Pain
America No More…
Uniting Against Tech Oligarchy: The Sale of TikTok and the Open App Markets...
Democrats Should Join the Call for FDA to Accelerate Approval of Smokefree Products
'Apple Doesn’t Fall Far From the Tree': Chairman Comer Reacts to Biden's Refusal...
Senate Republicans Once Again Demand Standalone Aid for Israel
FISA Extension Now Heads to the Senate

Abortions and the Military

Will the military become the pro-choice movement’s preferred battleground to embed government-funded abortion in American public policy? And will the result be more harm to women and the country they are fighting to defend?


From Townhall Magazine's June feature, "Harming Women: Abortions and the Military," by Kathy Jessup:

Bethany Saros was a relatively unknown writer until November 2011 when a story by the Minnesota mother and Army veteran became a headline on Salon’s liberal, national website.

Saros wrote about becoming pregnant during a brief, battlefield love affair during her Army deployment in Iraq. She said her choice to become a single mother flew in the face of what she claimed is the U.S. military’s “unspoken code that a good soldier will have an abortion, continue the mission, and get some sympathy because she chose duty over motherhood.”

Saros’ narrative was a surprisingly pro-life piece for a decidedly pro-choice publication that several weeks later would feature a story subhead declaring lateterm abortions needed to remain legal in the U.S.

A coincidence? Perhaps, but consider Senate Democrats were busy introducing an amendment to a defense appropriations bill that California Democrat Sen. Barbara Boxer said would provide the “full range of reproductive-health care” options to military women who became pregnant as the result of a rape.

It was Democrats’ third attempt in two years to make a dent in the Hyde Amendment, the original ban on government health care coverage for abortion. ....


America’s servicewomen got their first military-issue maternity uniforms in 1980. But questions about pregnancy and America’s servicewoman remain unresolved.

The viability of the unborn remains the tantamount concern. But to what degree should the military be allowed to control the sexual activities of its members?

Neither abortion, where an unborn child pays the price for sexual activity, nor military discharge, which can undercut unit readiness, solve the pregnancy dilemma.


Either way, liberals want the American taxpayer to pick up the tab for decisions of passion via abortion costs or in lost productivity and assigning replacements when a pregnant servicewoman must be unexpectedly furloughed.

One person posting comments on one military website suggests Maj. Gen. Cucolo was justified in ordering “no sex in a war zone.”

“He saw a problem and tried to solve it,” the person wrote. “He should have known better.”

Read more of Kathy Jessup's piece in the June isssue of Townhall Magazine.

Order Townhall Magazine today!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos