'This Is Where the Systematic Killing Took Place': 200 Days of War From...
White House Insists Biden Has Been 'Very Clear' About His Position on Pro-Hamas...
Watch Biden Lose the Battle With His Teleprompter Again
Thanks, Biden! Here's How Iran Is Still Making Billions to Fund Terrorism
Texas Doesn't Take Passive Approach to Anti-Israel Mobs
Columbia Prof Who Called to Defund the Police, Now Wants Police to Protect...
Pelosi's Daughter Criticizes J6 Judges Who are 'Out for Blood' After Handing Down...
Mike Johnson Addresses Anti-Israel Hate As Hundreds Harass the School’s Jewish Community
DeSantis May Not Be Facing Biden in November, but Still Offers Perfect Response...
Lawmakers in One State Pass Legislation to Allow Teachers to Carry Guns in...
UnitedHealth Has Too Much Power
Former Democratic Rep. Who Lost to John Fetterman Sure Doesn't Like the Senator...
Biden Rewrote Title IX to Protect 'Trans' People. Here's How Somes States Responded.
Watch: Joe Biden's Latest Flub Is Laugh-Out-Loud Funny
Hundreds of Athletes Urge the NCAA to Allow Men to Compete Against Women
Tipsheet

This Is Why You Should Look Before You Leap In Libya

You're between a rock and a hard place when a radical group your country views as terrorists is suddenly helping fight to overthrow a crazed and dangerous dictator in their own country. Common sense would say you just shouldn't get involved, right?

Advertisement

"If Qadhafi does fall — and reports from the Libyan capital indicated he was on the way out — it would represent a vindication of sorts for Obama, who predicted that a combination of NATO airstrikes and economic sanctions would ultimately topple a despot who ruled his oil-rich nation with an iron hand for four decades. ... 'Qadhafi needs to acknowledge the reality that he no longer controls Libya. He needs to relinquish power once and for all,' Obama wrote." ~ Politico article from August 2011

Now, there's this article from the Washington Post, pointed out by Hot Air's Allahpundit, showing that some pockets of these supposedly democratic-loving rebels may not be as "democratic" as the West would like:

"Although it went largely unnoticed during the tumultuous civil war the regime lost last month, Islamists were at the heart of the fight, many as rebel commanders. Now some are clashing with secularists within the rebels’ Transitional National Council, prompting worries among some liberals that the Islamists — who still command the bulk of fighters and weapons — could use their strength to assert an even more dominant role. ...

"In the fight against Gaddafi’s forces, the Islamist militants played an important role among the rebels’ rag-tag forces because of their experience in battles abroad. With a place in the new Libya, most have said that their days as militants are over. The largest of the organizations, the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, has re-branded itself as the Libyan Islamic Movement for Change. ...

Advertisement

"While Gaddafi’s government tolerated little in the way of activism, Libya’s Islamist groups appear to have emerged from his reign as the best-organized among political groups, and secularists among Libya’s new leaders appear determined not to alienate them."

The article shows there are struggles right now among the rebels as everyone hashes out just how strong of a role the Islamists will play. But the photo caption from the Getty image that ran with the article does not sound promising for the United States: "Abdel Hakim Belhaj, commander of the Tripoli Military Council, is now responsible for keeping order in Tripoli. He was formerly the emir of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which was considered a terrorist organization by the United States."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement