Investigators Find 177 Dead Dogs With Gunshot Wounds at 'No Kill' Animal Rescue
A Democratic Majority Will Destroy Women's Rights
Things Only Get More Confusing at NPR; Politico Is Blameless for Predicting Gas...
Antifa Is Now Threatening to Kill the Federal Judges Who Sent Members to...
Did Rep. Jayapal Really Say That Listening to Angel Parents Is a Waste...
RI Gun Store Saw Long Lines Ahead of State's Assault Weapon Ban
American Legion Riders to Escort Historic U.S. Flag Into Washington for America's 250th...
The Face of American Socialism Is Rich, White, and College Educated
The Supreme Court's Birthright Citizenship Mistake
World Cup: U.S. Defeats Bosnia 2-0 to Advance in Electric Fashion
Tim Walz Helps Pardon Laotian Man Convicted of Raping 10-Year-Old
Mexican National Sentenced to Five Years for Smuggling Drugged Children Across Border
DOJ Sues Two States Over Gun Laws
Former SSA Employee Convicted of Stealing $1.8M by Impersonating Dead Beneficiaries
Arkansas Woman Sentenced to 18 Months for Multi-State Unemployment Fraud
Tipsheet

Victor Davis Hanson Reveals Three Ways Operation Epic Fury Ends, And Why They All Leave the US Better Off

Victor Davis Hanson Reveals Three Ways Operation Epic Fury Ends, And Why They All Leave the US Better Off
AP Photo/Vahid Salemi

Victor Davis Hanson, a military historian, classicist, and senior fellow at the Hoover Institute, revealed the three outcomes he sees coming out of Operation Epic Fury, all of which he argued leave the United States in a better position than when it started.

Advertisement

"There's three possible outcomes in our view, and they're all better than the pre-war one," Hanson said. 

"The first is that we did so much damage to the military and discredited it. There's a popular revolt. I'm not sure that's going to happen," he said, "But it could. The second is the Venezuela situation where somebody emerges that we're not really in favor of, but they're going to put a lid on the theocracy and work with the West."

As of now, those outcomes seem unlikely. While President Trump has called on the Iranian people to rise up and take control of their government, so far the response has been limited to street celebrations, as many Iranians are still reeling from the mass slaughter the regime carried out during previous uprisings. The prospect of a government figure emerging who is more aligned, or at least subservient, to the West remains uncertain, especially after the Iranian regime named Ali Khamenei’s son, Mojtaba, as the new Ayatollah, a decision President Trump opposes. Whether he will be removed or replaced in the future is still an open question.

Advertisement

Hanson went on:

And the third is you're just going to do so much damage to the command and control and the military infrastructure that you just let them stew in their own juice. And then you say to the Iranian people, these people did this to you and we're here to help sometime, but go to it. And whatever happens will be better than having them close to a nuclear weapon and with all the assets they had. So we're in a good position.

Ideally, this operation concludes with one of the first two outcomes, which have the potential to reshape policy in the Middle East. Western-aligned countries, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, would emerge as regional powers, keeping their neighbors in check and fostering peaceful coexistence and trade in a more Western-aligned framework.

Editor's Note: For decades, former presidents have been all talk and no action. Now, Donald Trump is eliminating the threat from Iran once and for all. 

Help us report the truth about the Trump administration’s decisive actions to keep Americans safe and bring peace to the world. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos