Iran's New Leader Breaks Silence, Issues Threats Against US and Arab Neighbors
Gavin Newsom Is Crushing the Field in This 2028 Preview
We Can See Why This NYT Reporter Deleted His Post About the NYC...
The Old Dominion University Shooter Has Been ID'd and It Looks Like Islamic...
After Threatening ICE Agents, a Wisconsin Man Enters the FO Stage
Democrats Are Attacking Hegseth's Supposed Steak Budget. They'll Hate This Next Number.
UPDATE: Suspected MI Synagogue Shooter Engaged by Security, Reportedly Dead
Check Out What London Is Now Recommending City Buses Carry for Some Unspoken...
Gunman Dead After Opening Fire at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia
Fetterman Goes Off on Fellow Democrats: Why Can’t They Just Admit Operation Epic...
The White House Pushes Back on Reports That Iran Could Be Targeting the...
President Trump Unloads on Thomas Massie at Kentucky Rally: ‘We Gotta Get Rid...
Trans Mania Sweeps New Mexico Schools – Even Elementaries Will ‘Affirm’ Gender Choices
Michigan Man Sentenced to 5 Years for Dark Web Credential Fraud
Tipsheet

Victor Davis Hanson Reveals Three Ways Operation Epic Fury Ends, And Why They All Leave the US Better Off

Victor Davis Hanson Reveals Three Ways Operation Epic Fury Ends, And Why They All Leave the US Better Off
AP Photo/Vahid Salemi

Victor Davis Hanson, a military historian, classicist, and senior fellow at the Hoover Institute, revealed the three outcomes he sees coming out of Operation Epic Fury, all of which he argued leave the United States in a better position than when it started.

Advertisement

"There's three possible outcomes in our view, and they're all better than the pre-war one," Hanson said. 

"The first is that we did so much damage to the military and discredited it. There's a popular revolt. I'm not sure that's going to happen," he said, "But it could. The second is the Venezuela situation where somebody emerges that we're not really in favor of, but they're going to put a lid on the theocracy and work with the West."

As of now, those outcomes seem unlikely. While President Trump has called on the Iranian people to rise up and take control of their government, so far the response has been limited to street celebrations, as many Iranians are still reeling from the mass slaughter the regime carried out during previous uprisings. The prospect of a government figure emerging who is more aligned, or at least subservient, to the West remains uncertain, especially after the Iranian regime named Ali Khamenei’s son, Mojtaba, as the new Ayatollah, a decision President Trump opposes. Whether he will be removed or replaced in the future is still an open question.

Advertisement

Hanson went on:

And the third is you're just going to do so much damage to the command and control and the military infrastructure that you just let them stew in their own juice. And then you say to the Iranian people, these people did this to you and we're here to help sometime, but go to it. And whatever happens will be better than having them close to a nuclear weapon and with all the assets they had. So we're in a good position.

Ideally, this operation concludes with one of the first two outcomes, which have the potential to reshape policy in the Middle East. Western-aligned countries, including Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, would emerge as regional powers, keeping their neighbors in check and fostering peaceful coexistence and trade in a more Western-aligned framework.

Editor's Note: For decades, former presidents have been all talk and no action. Now, Donald Trump is eliminating the threat from Iran once and for all. 

Help us report the truth about the Trump administration’s decisive actions to keep Americans safe and bring peace to the world. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your VIP membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos