Can the Left Go One Day Without Criticizing President Trump? No, They Cannot.
Police Warned the Fairfax County Prosecutor About the Violent Illegal Alien Who Murdered...
Legendary Notre Dame Football Coach Lou Holtz Has Died Aged 89
Jim Jordan Exposed Tim Walz's Dishonesty at Oversight Committee Hearing on Minnesota Fraud
Wyoming Sheriffs Have Problem Preserving Second Amendment
Iranian Women's Rights Activist Calls Out Kamala Harris Silence on Regime's Atrocities: 'W...
Despite What Democrats May Tell You, Americans Want the SAVE Act
Victor Davis Hanson Explains Why This Time The War in the Middle East...
Three Men Plead Guilty to $88 Million 'Pre-IPO' Securities Fraud Scheme
Montana Sen. Steve Daines Won't Seek Re-Election
West Virginia Man Faces Federal Charges for Alleged Death Threats to President Trump,...
$360 Million Stolen: New Bill Targets Rampant SNAP Card Skimming
Honduran National Sentenced to 6.5 Years for Assaulting ICE Officer in Oklahoma City
U.S. Senate Rejects Measure to Halt Strikes on Iran
Japanese National Who Allegedly Tried to Sell Plutonium to Fake Iranian General Sentenced...
Tipsheet

Scott Jennings Blasts California’s Wealth Tax As Cover-Up for the States $70B Fraud Problem

Scott Jennings Blasts California’s Wealth Tax As Cover-Up for the States $70B Fraud Problem
AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis

Scott Jennings slammed California’s latest budget move: a proposed five percent wealth tax on the state’s wealthiest residents. When he argued the tax was meant to recoup billions lost to fraud, the CNN panel erupted. At the same time, Abby Phillip brushed it off, claiming every state loses money to fraud, as if widespread losses justify ignoring the problem.

Advertisement

"I'm not arguing for it, I'm just saying, it's not a millionaire tax, it's a billionaire tax," Phillip said. "So the idea would be, I guess, to use that revenue to offer improvements for the average Californian."

"Worth debating, why pick a billion?" Jennings replied. "Why in Washington did you pick a million? Why didn't you pick $999,999? Why not pick $500,000? Why pick five percent? Why not six [percent]? Why not 10 [percent], why not 20 [percent], why not 50 [percent]?"

"The thing is, it's all arbitrary just to attack people that we hate. And it is not for the public benefit. In California, the state auditor just found $70 billion in fraud. The reason they need a wealth tax is to cover up the fraud. The hole in California's budget is due to fraud. That's why they're trying to tax..."

Jennings was then interrupted as the liberals on the panel attempted to jump in before their listeners could hear.

Abby Phillip made a curious, almost conceding argument, admitting, “There is fraud in every state in the union, in red states and in blue states.”

Does that excuse the fraud, or the attempt to cover it up?

Advertisement

Jennings even asked if the extra money in the hands of the California government automatically meant the state would wisely and effectively spend it.

Just imagine if the same scrutiny applied to Minnesota were applied to California, whose welfare programs have more loopholes, more bureaucracy, and are far better funded.

The state auditor uncovered $70 billion in fraud; imagine what remains hidden. And that’s still just the tip of the iceberg, not even including the blatant waste of taxpayer money plaguing the state.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Townhall’s conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Townhall VIP and use promo code MERRY74 to get 74% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement