Calm Down About JD Vance
The DSA Hates America. Democrats Helped It Grow.
Thom Tillis Reveals He Regrets This Vote. No, He Doesn't.
Old Bill Maher Clip Absolutely Roasts Larry David's 'Ashamed to Be an American'...
A CNBC Host Asked a Dem Senator a Simple Question About Socialism. It...
Tucker Carlson Isn't the Only Prominent Former MAGA Supporter Leaving the GOP
About That San Francisco Supervisor That Stepped Away...
The WNBA's Shameful Treatment of Caitlin Clark Continues
The Mind and Brilliance of Alexis de Tocqueville, Part Two
A Time of Choosing
Trump: The Greater Risk Was Waiting
From London's Tennis Courts to California, Aggressive Taxes Always Disappoint
The Socialists Are Coming for Your Grandparents
Despite the 54th Anniversary of Title IX, Men Are Still Competing in Women’s...
Fog of War: When Political Rhetoric Meets Strategic Reality
Tipsheet

Climate Study That Shaped Global Policy Retracted After Major Error

Climate Study That Shaped Global Policy Retracted After Major Error
AP Photo/Susan Walsh

A widely cited 2024 study that claimed to forecast climate change’s dire economic impact globally was retracted on Wednesday. 

The withdrawal came far too late as the paper had already shaped analysis by the U.S. Congressional Budget Office, influenced policy work at the World Bank, and been adopted by the Network for Greening the Financial System, a global coalition of central banks, as a key tool for stress-testing financial portfolios under European climate-risk rules.

Advertisement

The study claimed that global economic output would plunge by 62 percent by 2100 if high carbon emissions continued.

More from the Wall Street Journal:

The study examined historical data from some 1,600 regions worldwide over the past four decades to project how changes in temperature and precipitation would affect economic growth, including factors like agricultural yields, labor productivity and infrastructure.

However, after the study was published, other researchers found that economic data from one country—Uzbekistan—during a short time from 1995 to 1999 had skewed the results. Without Uzbekistan, the 2100 damage forecast fell to 23%, not 62%. The researchers published their critique in Nature in August.

“We broadly agree with the issues raised, and have made corrections to the underlying economic data and to our methodology to address them,” the study's author, Leonie Wenz, said. “These changes are too substantial for a correction of the original article in Nature.”

Advertisement

Significant damage may already have been done, with major financial institutions relying on the study to assess climate-related risks. According to Ely Sandler, a researcher at the Harvard Kennedy School, the study might have pressured government regulators to require big banks to stash away extra reserves as a safety net, slowing economic growth in the process. That tied-up money could have otherwise been used to issue loans and expand the economy.

Editor’s Note: Thanks to President Trump’s leadership and bold policies, America’s economy is back on track.

Help us continue to report on the president’s economic successes and combat the lies of the Democrats. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement