Did You See This Clip of Obama's CIA Director Talking About Iran?
Outgoing Border Patrol Chief Shares One of His Biggest Regrets Before Retirement
Israel Moves to Ban Zohran Mamdani's Wife - This Is Why
These Arab Nations Have Told Iran's Diplomats to Go Pound Sand
How These City Employees Turned Taxpayer Cash Into Instagram Profits
Of Course Democrats Aren't Sorry
Trump Needs a Short War
Ohio Bill Putting Teeth in Law Barring Local Gun Control Advances
Joe Kent vs. Mark Levin: A Heated Exchange Over Israel, Iran, and Charlie...
The Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia Urges Trump to Continue Operation Epic Fury
Fetterman Drops the Hammer on Democrats' Tone Deaf Response to Sheridan Gorman's Murder
Democrat Wisconsin House Candidate Campaigns With Architect of Sanctuary City Policies
Republican Senate Candidate John Sununu Could Win in New Hampshire According to a...
Democrats Just Blocked DHS Funding Again
Sen. Ted Cruz Just Got Confirmation That the Democrat-Run FBI Was Spying on...
Tipsheet

Climate Study That Shaped Global Policy Retracted After Major Error

Climate Study That Shaped Global Policy Retracted After Major Error
AP Photo/Susan Walsh

A widely cited 2024 study that claimed to forecast climate change’s dire economic impact globally was retracted on Wednesday. 

The withdrawal came far too late as the paper had already shaped analysis by the U.S. Congressional Budget Office, influenced policy work at the World Bank, and been adopted by the Network for Greening the Financial System, a global coalition of central banks, as a key tool for stress-testing financial portfolios under European climate-risk rules.

Advertisement

The study claimed that global economic output would plunge by 62 percent by 2100 if high carbon emissions continued.

More from the Wall Street Journal:

The study examined historical data from some 1,600 regions worldwide over the past four decades to project how changes in temperature and precipitation would affect economic growth, including factors like agricultural yields, labor productivity and infrastructure.

However, after the study was published, other researchers found that economic data from one country—Uzbekistan—during a short time from 1995 to 1999 had skewed the results. Without Uzbekistan, the 2100 damage forecast fell to 23%, not 62%. The researchers published their critique in Nature in August.

“We broadly agree with the issues raised, and have made corrections to the underlying economic data and to our methodology to address them,” the study's author, Leonie Wenz, said. “These changes are too substantial for a correction of the original article in Nature.”

Advertisement

Significant damage may already have been done, with major financial institutions relying on the study to assess climate-related risks. According to Ely Sandler, a researcher at the Harvard Kennedy School, the study might have pressured government regulators to require big banks to stash away extra reserves as a safety net, slowing economic growth in the process. That tied-up money could have otherwise been used to issue loans and expand the economy.

Editor’s Note: Thanks to President Trump’s leadership and bold policies, America’s economy is back on track.

Help us continue to report on the president’s economic successes and combat the lies of the Democrats. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement