Norms Only Exist to Protect the Status Quo. Ignore Them.
There Was a Heavy Police Presence for a Reported Shooting Near a Top...
ICE Does a Triple Pick-Up of Illegals in Minnesota...and Their Crimes Are Henious
(D)ifferent Kinds of Kings
When Dissent Becomes Sabotage: The Rise of the Counter-MAGA Fifth Column
Criminals Are Stealing Billions From America’s Seniors. AARP Is Fighting Back.
Hey, Tucker: Christianity and Islam Have a Long and Very Bitter History
Disposable Democrats
The Media Exploit the Pope As Trump's Public Enemy No. 1
How Hungary Matters
When the Rules Don't Apply to the Rulers
Mamdani’s Government Grocery Store Is an Awful Idea
Why Taxpayers Should Stop Funding Planned Parenthood and Start Investing in Moms
Massachusetts School District Enters Federal Agreement to Protect Jewish Students From Har...
Indian National Convicted for Scamming 79-Year-Old Vietnam Veteran Out of Gold
Tipsheet

Principal Deputy Solicitor General Silences Justice Sotomayor in Louisiana Redistricting Showdown

Principal Deputy Solicitor General Silences Justice Sotomayor in Louisiana Redistricting Showdown
Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP, Pool

Principal Deputy Solicitor General Hashim Mooppan engaged in a spat during oral arguments on Wednesday with Obama appointee, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, during oral arguments for Louisiana v Callais.

Advertisement

The case concerns Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and challenges whether Louisiana’s 2024 congressional map, which created a second majority-Black district, is considered racial gerrymandering, which is illegal under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. 

Hashim Mooppan, arguing for the Trump administration, told the Supreme Court that the only reason the second Black congressional district was created was to ensure a majority-Black population. He said if the district had been majority white, there would be no case against it. Justice Sotomayor strongly disagreed, emphasizing that without such districts, Black voters would have little to no chance of electing black representatives due to racially motivated voting patterns. 

"You could control for parts in effect. There was recently polarized voting in the Democratic party. That's where Section 2 matters. Where you have a reason to think that a racial group is being treated..." Moopan began before he was interrupted by Justice Sotomayor.

"You have proof of that here, too," she said.

"No, you don't, what you have here is that Republicans and Democrats are different," he continued.

"No, you have — some — that even white Republicans or white Democrats won't vote for black candidates," Sotomayor said as you can hear Mooppan sigh.

Advertisement

"Right," Moopan continued. "But if these were white Democrats, there is no reason to think they would have a second district. None. And so what is happening here is their argument is, because these Democrats happen to be black, they get a second district. If they were all white, we would all agree that they wouldn't get a second district. That is literally the definition of race subordinating traditional principles. 

Mooppan’s argument solidifies the conservative view of the matter, that race-neutral principles, not racial outcomes, should guide district lines. A standard that was and remains unclear to Democrats. 

Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement