Graham Platner Was the Perfect Democrat Candidate
What This Flight Instructor Did Was Terrifying
Is Graham Platner's Top Aide Serious With This Tweet?
It's Sad This Case Got That Far, But It Was a Good Day...
Federal Appeals Court Upholds Illinois AR-15 Ban. Here's What They Said.
SC National Guard Suspended These Pilots Over This Flyover...and Then Pete Hegseth Found...
That Gay Cruise Turned Away by Turkey Was Denied Docking in a Second...
The Return of Socialism and the GOP's Golden Opportunity
Rahmbo
A New Iranian Assassination Plot Targeting President Trump Was Just Uncovered
Diplomacy Finally Caught Up With Reality in Lebanon: Rubio’s Masterstroke
10 Reasons the DSA Isn’t the Fringe, It’s the Democrats' Heir Apparent
Is This Week's Freedom to Fix Agreement Trump’s Biggest Pro-Farmer Victory yet?
Judge the Movement, Not the Mission Statement
Only One Revolution Ended in Liberty
Tipsheet

Principal Deputy Solicitor General Silences Justice Sotomayor in Louisiana Redistricting Showdown

Principal Deputy Solicitor General Silences Justice Sotomayor in Louisiana Redistricting Showdown
Erin Schaff/The New York Times via AP, Pool

Principal Deputy Solicitor General Hashim Mooppan engaged in a spat during oral arguments on Wednesday with Obama appointee, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, during oral arguments for Louisiana v Callais.

Advertisement

The case concerns Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and challenges whether Louisiana’s 2024 congressional map, which created a second majority-Black district, is considered racial gerrymandering, which is illegal under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. 

Hashim Mooppan, arguing for the Trump administration, told the Supreme Court that the only reason the second Black congressional district was created was to ensure a majority-Black population. He said if the district had been majority white, there would be no case against it. Justice Sotomayor strongly disagreed, emphasizing that without such districts, Black voters would have little to no chance of electing black representatives due to racially motivated voting patterns. 

"You could control for parts in effect. There was recently polarized voting in the Democratic party. That's where Section 2 matters. Where you have a reason to think that a racial group is being treated..." Moopan began before he was interrupted by Justice Sotomayor.

"You have proof of that here, too," she said.

"No, you don't, what you have here is that Republicans and Democrats are different," he continued.

"No, you have — some — that even white Republicans or white Democrats won't vote for black candidates," Sotomayor said as you can hear Mooppan sigh.

Advertisement

"Right," Moopan continued. "But if these were white Democrats, there is no reason to think they would have a second district. None. And so what is happening here is their argument is, because these Democrats happen to be black, they get a second district. If they were all white, we would all agree that they wouldn't get a second district. That is literally the definition of race subordinating traditional principles. 

Mooppan’s argument solidifies the conservative view of the matter, that race-neutral principles, not racial outcomes, should guide district lines. A standard that was and remains unclear to Democrats. 

Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement