Reconciliation 2.0 Is Getting Some High Marks. This Is a MUST-Pass for the...
Karoline Leavitt Wrecked This Lefty Reporter for His Awful Take on the Minneapolis...
Some Are Saying Nick Shirley's Latest Video on Somali Fraud Is Worse Than...
Another Shooting by ICE Has the Press Desperately Looking for Ways to Reframe...
Wisconsin Cannot Afford to Follow Minnesota
HHS Secretary Kennedy Announces Healthcare Price Transparency
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche Just Promised to Stop the 'Terrorism' of MN...
Is Socialism a Form of Moderation Amongst Democrats? A WaPo Columnist Thinks So
Tim Walz Walz Begs the White House to 'Turn Down the Temperature' After...
TX Congressional Candidate Claims to Be a Trump Ally, but His Record Shows...
Cea Weaver Describes Rent-Control As a Way to Cripple the Real Estate Market
Illinois Businessman Sentenced to Six Years for $55 Million Loan and PPP Fraud...
Tim Walz Calls ICE an ‘Occupation’ as Minneapolis Descends into Chaos
North Carolina Woman Sentenced to 6 Years in $12M Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Texas Doctor, Assistant Get Prison Time for $3M Healthcare Fraud Targeting Elderly
Tipsheet

UN's Top Court Says Failure to Stop Climate Change Violates International Law

AP Photo/Jiri Buller

The United Nations' top court, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), just announced that if countries fail to take measures to protect the planet from climate change, they could violate international law. The court also said that countries "harmed" by climate change could be entitled to reparations on a "case by case" basis, according to the Associated Press.

Advertisement

The ICJ on Wednesday issued an advisory opinion on what countries are legally required to do about climate change and what could happen if they fail to act, calling the crisis an “urgent and existential” threat to human life. The court's president, Yuji Iwasawa, said during the hearing that the “failure of a state to take appropriate action to protect the climate system...may constitute an internationally wrongful act."

Thankfully, the opinion is non-binding, but the over 500-page opinion is viewed as a turning point for international climate law. The case was brought forth by Vanuatu, an island nation in the Pacific, and backed by another 130 countries, including the UK, France, Germany, and Australia.

Island nations have led the charge, driven by the fear that rising sea levels could one day erase them. 

U.N. General Assembly asked the ICJ for an advisory opinion back in 2023. The panel of judges explored two key questions: What are countries obligated to do under international law to protect the climate and environment from human-caused greenhouse gas emissions? And, what are the legal consequences when a government’s actions, or failure to act, cause serious harm to the climate and environment? 

The opinion by the ICJ raises some serious concerns about the state of multi-national governing bodies that could one day impose legal liabilities and forced reparations on participating countries, including the United States. A question of sovereignty and independence arises, where American policy is beholden to the international community instead of Americans. And if the UN thinks this is the kind of ruling that strengthens its legitimacy, it’s no wonder so many now see the institution as little more than a punchline.

Thank god the U.S. is not beholden to the ICJ.

Advertisement

Editor's NotePresident Trump is leading America into the "Golden Age" as Democrats try desperately to stop it.  

Help us continue to report on President Trump's successes. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT for 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement