Some Republicans Know How to Win
The OPEC Cartel Crackup
Zyn Isn't Sin
Jake Tapper Wants to Shield Jokes From Criticism...Unless He Is the One Dictating...
Educated to Death
Charlie Kirk Changed My College Decision
The Media Could Attempt a 'Nonpartisan Bias'
How to Think About Affordability
Your Whereabouts Are Known at All Times
Two Nations With Shared Values
Clarence Thomas Sounds the Alarm: Progressivism’s Direct Assault on the Declaration of Ind...
Finland Study Shows 'Gender Affirming Care' Is Losing the Science. Children’s Hospitals Be...
Is SCOTUS Ducking Transgender School Cases?
You Will Own Nothing
Marco Rubio Is Standing Up to China Over This Major Trade Partner
Tipsheet

SCOTUS to Decide: Can States Say No to Men in Women’s Sports?

SCOTUS to Decide: Can States Say No to Men in Women’s Sports?
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

The United States Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear two cases involving state bans on men in women's sports, according to the Wall Street Journal.

One of the cases comes from Boise State University in Idaho, where a man was prevented from competing in women's track events. The plaintiff argues that the law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The other case comes from West Virginia, where a 12-year-old boy was barred from competing on the girls' middle school track team.

Advertisement

West Virginia Attorney General JB McCuskey said in a statement:

It’s a great day, as female athletes in West Virginia will have their voices heard. The people of West Virginia know that it’s unfair to let male athletes compete against women; that’s why we passed this common sense law preserving women’s sports for women.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which is representing the plaintiffs in the case, is arguing that the bans unfairly target 'transgender' children. Joshua Block, an attorney for the ACLU said:

Like any other educational program, school athletic programs should be accessible for everyone regardless of their sex or transgender status. Trans kids play sports for the same reasons their peers do—to learn perseverance, dedication, teamwork, and to simply have fun with their friends,

In a recent ruling, United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on 'transgender' medical treatments for minors. The Court applied the lowest level of constitutional scrutiny, rational basis review, concluding that the state had a legitimate governmental interest in enforcing the ban. 

Advertisement

They refused to determine whether so-called transgender individuals were entitled to expanded legal protections as a protected class. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote in concurrence with the majority opinion that 'transgender' should not qualify as a protected class, but it was not adopted as the rationale of the Court. 

These new cases could very well allow the Court to put that issue to rest.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement