Conspiracy Theorists Are Conspiring to Be Stupid
Of Course, Politico Says Christmas Is a Right Wing Boogaloo
NBC News Pushes Pity Piece for Judges Who Have Ruled Against Trump
Slouching Toward Open Season on Jews
Kafka on Steroids
Jesus Brought Division, Not ‘Peace on Earth’
My Christmas Carol
In Appreciation of What Makes America's Generosity Possible
These Cringey Trans Terrorists Just Got Handed Federal Charges
Former USDA Worker Owes $36M in Restitution for Selling SNAP Data to Criminals
Why Christmas Is the Greatest Story of All Time
A Messianic Jew Reflects on Christmas
Let There Be Light
Joy to the World
Is President Donald Trump Going to Heaven?
Tipsheet

SCOTUS to Decide: Can States Say No to Men in Women’s Sports?

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

The United States Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to hear two cases involving state bans on men in women's sports, according to the Wall Street Journal.

One of the cases comes from Boise State University in Idaho, where a man was prevented from competing in women's track events. The plaintiff argues that the law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The other case comes from West Virginia, where a 12-year-old boy was barred from competing on the girls' middle school track team.

Advertisement

West Virginia Attorney General JB McCuskey said in a statement:

It’s a great day, as female athletes in West Virginia will have their voices heard. The people of West Virginia know that it’s unfair to let male athletes compete against women; that’s why we passed this common sense law preserving women’s sports for women.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which is representing the plaintiffs in the case, is arguing that the bans unfairly target 'transgender' children. Joshua Block, an attorney for the ACLU said:

Like any other educational program, school athletic programs should be accessible for everyone regardless of their sex or transgender status. Trans kids play sports for the same reasons their peers do—to learn perseverance, dedication, teamwork, and to simply have fun with their friends,

In a recent ruling, United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court upheld Tennessee's ban on 'transgender' medical treatments for minors. The Court applied the lowest level of constitutional scrutiny, rational basis review, concluding that the state had a legitimate governmental interest in enforcing the ban. 

Advertisement

They refused to determine whether so-called transgender individuals were entitled to expanded legal protections as a protected class. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote in concurrence with the majority opinion that 'transgender' should not qualify as a protected class, but it was not adopted as the rationale of the Court. 

These new cases could very well allow the Court to put that issue to rest.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement