Trump Has a Question About Regime Change in Iran
Here's What Impressed This MSNBC Host About Trump's Air Strikes on Iran
Marco Rubio Obliterates CBS News Host Over This Simple Fact About Iran
Scott Jennings Took an Ex-DNC Spokesperson to the Cleaners Over the Legality of...
Completely Obliterated
Harris' Team Wanted Mark Cuban to Submit VP Vetting Papers. Here's How the...
An Alarming Number of Iranian Nationals Were Released Into the U.S. Under Biden
Jasmine Crockett Fumes That Trump Didn’t 'Holla' for Her Permission Before Hitting Iran
Flawless Execution: Vance Applauds Trump’s National Security Team for Crippling Iran’s Nuc...
'He Truly Saved the World:' Iranian Refugee Calls for Trump to Receive Nobel...
Suspect Killed by Security Guard After Michigan Church Shooting
Flashback: Chuck Schumer Thoroughly Mocked for His 'TACO Trump' Post on Iran
Authorities, Local Law Enforcement Remain on High Alert to Protect U.S. Cities from...
Iran Escalates Rhetoric After Trump Flattens Nuclear Sites
Dems Panic as Trump Obliterates Iran’s Nuclear Threat—Push War Powers Stunt While World...
Tipsheet

Left-leaning Pundit on 2016: "Democrats Should be Very Worried"

Van Jones, who once advised the president and is now a co-host on CNN’s Crossfire, recently had a few words of caution for Democrats giddy about 2016 (via The Blaze):

Advertisement

Jones illustrates two reasons why Democrats should be less-than-enthused about the 2016 primary season: The obvious diversity—and star power—of the opposition party. “This is going to be the greatest show on earth,” he contends. Some of us, however, might disagree with this characterization, but he’s right that Democrats are not fielding candidates that are terribly inspiring. In fact, they are already looking for someone who can effectively challenge Hillary Clinton as the early frontrunner. So far, their hopes have been in vain.

While Jones certainly does have a point about a burgeoning "rainbow coalition" of "superstars"—few Republicans would argue that the 2016 field is weaker than four years ago—this is a double-edged sword. Part of the problem with an overcrowded, talented field is that candidates will need to fight harder—and perhaps play dirtier—to appeal to Republican primarygoers. This of course could be a recipe for disaster. Imagine, for instance, Hillary Clinton securing the nomination relatively early on while Republicans make mincemeat of each other for months on end. Will this not damage their brand overall, at least in the eyes of moderate and centrist voters? It will feel like 2012 all over again.

Advertisement

Still, I suppose having too many good candidates in the running is a better problem to have than too few. Right?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement