Here's What We Learned From Virginia's Election Results
It Is a Week of Scandals Involving Reporters and Parties Involving News Outlets
Does the Right Still Believe in 'No More Souters'?
Faith Rebound: Signs of Spiritual Awakening Continue As Gen Z Turns to God,...
Connecticut House Passes Controversial Gun Control Bill
There Is a Reason Why There Are So Few Great Men Today
The New York Times Finds a Glamorous Backer of Theft and Murder
All Redistricting Reformers Are Hypocrites
Trump Cuts FDA Red Tape on Ibogaine: Veterans Finally Get a Real Shot...
Kansas Legislature Shows Rest of Nation How to Get Good Things Done
Chicago Public Schools and Mayor Brandon Johnson Declare ‘Day of Civic Action’ on...
Trump and Tennessee Republicans Are Delivering Affordable Energy
FBI, DEA Seize 120 Pounds of Meth, 25 Guns in Massive Mexican Mafia...
School Food Director Charged With Stealing Lunches From Kids to Stock His Beach...
Army Soldier Charged With Using Classified Intel on Maduro Raid to Win $409K...
Tipsheet

Left-leaning Pundit on 2016: "Democrats Should be Very Worried"

Left-leaning Pundit on 2016: "Democrats Should be Very Worried"

Van Jones, who once advised the president and is now a co-host on CNN’s Crossfire, recently had a few words of caution for Democrats giddy about 2016 (via The Blaze):

Advertisement

Jones illustrates two reasons why Democrats should be less-than-enthused about the 2016 primary season: The obvious diversity—and star power—of the opposition party. “This is going to be the greatest show on earth,” he contends. Some of us, however, might disagree with this characterization, but he’s right that Democrats are not fielding candidates that are terribly inspiring. In fact, they are already looking for someone who can effectively challenge Hillary Clinton as the early frontrunner. So far, their hopes have been in vain.

While Jones certainly does have a point about a burgeoning "rainbow coalition" of "superstars"—few Republicans would argue that the 2016 field is weaker than four years ago—this is a double-edged sword. Part of the problem with an overcrowded, talented field is that candidates will need to fight harder—and perhaps play dirtier—to appeal to Republican primarygoers. This of course could be a recipe for disaster. Imagine, for instance, Hillary Clinton securing the nomination relatively early on while Republicans make mincemeat of each other for months on end. Will this not damage their brand overall, at least in the eyes of moderate and centrist voters? It will feel like 2012 all over again.

Advertisement

Still, I suppose having too many good candidates in the running is a better problem to have than too few. Right?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement