California's Suicide Path
It Was Already Gonna Happen, But What Fetterman Said About Trump Will Lead...
The Three Top Things Revealed During Trump's Meeting With Netanyahu at Mar-a-Lago
Tim Walz Forced to Respond to Videos Showing Rampant Somali Fraud in Minnesota....
Those Who Weaponized Government Against Trump Should Be Shaking In Their Boots After...
Those Minnesota Fraudsters Aren't Going to Be Happy About What Kash Patel Just...
Guess Which Country Will Lead the UN's Security Council In January
Will Minnesota Prosecute Nick Shirley for His Flagrant Act of Journalism?
When Noticing Fraud Is ‘Scapegoating’: NYT's Mara Gay Defends Minnesota’s Somali Welfare S...
The Heckler Awards, Part 3 – Celebrating the Bottom of Journalism in 2025
The Argument Is Getting Louder and the Evidence Is Getting Harder to Ignore
Washington Post Backs Trump's 'Righteous' Strikes in Nigeria
Judge Rules That Transcript, Audio Recordings From Tyler Robinson Hearing Can Be Released
2024 VP Debate Clip Haunts Tim Walz As Mass Childcare Fraud Is Revealed...
LA Mayor Claims Hispanic Americans Joining Border Patrol Are Desperate for Money
Tipsheet

Left-leaning Pundit on 2016: "Democrats Should be Very Worried"

Van Jones, who once advised the president and is now a co-host on CNN’s Crossfire, recently had a few words of caution for Democrats giddy about 2016 (via The Blaze):

Advertisement

Jones illustrates two reasons why Democrats should be less-than-enthused about the 2016 primary season: The obvious diversity—and star power—of the opposition party. “This is going to be the greatest show on earth,” he contends. Some of us, however, might disagree with this characterization, but he’s right that Democrats are not fielding candidates that are terribly inspiring. In fact, they are already looking for someone who can effectively challenge Hillary Clinton as the early frontrunner. So far, their hopes have been in vain.

While Jones certainly does have a point about a burgeoning "rainbow coalition" of "superstars"—few Republicans would argue that the 2016 field is weaker than four years ago—this is a double-edged sword. Part of the problem with an overcrowded, talented field is that candidates will need to fight harder—and perhaps play dirtier—to appeal to Republican primarygoers. This of course could be a recipe for disaster. Imagine, for instance, Hillary Clinton securing the nomination relatively early on while Republicans make mincemeat of each other for months on end. Will this not damage their brand overall, at least in the eyes of moderate and centrist voters? It will feel like 2012 all over again.

Advertisement

Still, I suppose having too many good candidates in the running is a better problem to have than too few. Right?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement