ME Dem Senate Candidate on Platner: That Nazi Oyster Farmer Accused of Rape...
Abigail Spanberger Gets Lit Up Over Her Energy Affordability Lies
If Your Ideology Requires the Silencing of Dissidents, Your Ideology Is Dangerous (and...
Elissa Slotkin Admits Why the Democrats Really Oppose the SAVE America Act
Ted Cruz Remembers His Dear Friend Lindsey Graham
Thanks for Proving 'Banned Books' Was a Lie, Dua Lipa
Never Forget the Media's Despicable Response to the Butler Assassination Attempt
Illness, Death and Turmoil Change Face of GOP Senate
What in the World Is Going on With Haley Stevens
Here's How Apple and Google Helped Keep Graham Platner's Campaign Alive
Trump Just Gave a Huge Update on Iran
'It's Not Extreme': Guess What the DSA Wants to Abolish Now
Texas Is About to Take on Birth Tourism
Rebecca Cooke Sold Herself As an Outsider While Profiting From Democratic Political Consul...
'Disgusting Ideology': Brandon Gill Blasts DEI Policies in Joint Committee Hearing
Tipsheet

Left-leaning Pundit on 2016: "Democrats Should be Very Worried"

Left-leaning Pundit on 2016: "Democrats Should be Very Worried"

Van Jones, who once advised the president and is now a co-host on CNN’s Crossfire, recently had a few words of caution for Democrats giddy about 2016 (via The Blaze):

Advertisement

Jones illustrates two reasons why Democrats should be less-than-enthused about the 2016 primary season: The obvious diversity—and star power—of the opposition party. “This is going to be the greatest show on earth,” he contends. Some of us, however, might disagree with this characterization, but he’s right that Democrats are not fielding candidates that are terribly inspiring. In fact, they are already looking for someone who can effectively challenge Hillary Clinton as the early frontrunner. So far, their hopes have been in vain.

While Jones certainly does have a point about a burgeoning "rainbow coalition" of "superstars"—few Republicans would argue that the 2016 field is weaker than four years ago—this is a double-edged sword. Part of the problem with an overcrowded, talented field is that candidates will need to fight harder—and perhaps play dirtier—to appeal to Republican primarygoers. This of course could be a recipe for disaster. Imagine, for instance, Hillary Clinton securing the nomination relatively early on while Republicans make mincemeat of each other for months on end. Will this not damage their brand overall, at least in the eyes of moderate and centrist voters? It will feel like 2012 all over again.

Advertisement

Still, I suppose having too many good candidates in the running is a better problem to have than too few. Right?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement