Yes, Georgia Is Having a Special Session to Redraw Its Maps, but You...
Finally, We Can Turn the Page on Too Late Powell
Why Mississippi's Governor Called Off a Special Session to Redraw Its Maps Today
This Democrat Just Raked the New York Times Over the Coals Over Claims...
Press Is Attacking Pratt, Ignoring the Dems Attacking Courts, and Overlooking the IdiAOC...
Here's Another Woke Judge Putting Criminals Ahead of Public Safety
Here's More From Xavier Becerra's Embarrassing Interview With KTLA
Zohran Mamdani Is Bragging About Erasing NYC's Budget Deficit. There's Just One Problem.
JD Vance Announces the White House Fraud Task Force's Latest Move to Stop...
LOL: Former DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas Now Claims He Wanted Biden to Close...
Mike Johnson: Republicans Must Defeat the Mamdanis of the Democratic Party
China: Our Enemy, Not Our Rival
Leader of 'Maniac Murder Cult' Gets 15 Years for Plotting Poison Candy Attack...
Nearly 700 Fake Claims, $11 Million Stolen: Illinois Woman Found Guilty of COVID-19...
SNAP Crackdown: Mississippi Man Latest in Family Fraud Spree to Plead Guilty
Tipsheet

Sen. Cruz Urges Emergency Appeal on Pennsylvania Court Challenge

Sen. Cruz Urges Emergency Appeal on Pennsylvania Court Challenge
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

An appeals court recently ruled that the Trump campaign cannot stop the certification of their election results. Joe Biden won the state by about 2 percent, according to the AP. But Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) is urging the Supreme Court to hear an emergency appeal on a Pennsylvania election challenge, citing concerns about statewide mail-in voting enacted by the state legislature.

Advertisement

Cruz shared the statement on his Twitter page.

Cruz blamed the Democrat Pennsylvania Supreme Court for the change, and argued why it deserves to be analyzed.

"The appeal argues that Pennsylvania cannot change the range in the middle of the game," he wrote. "If Pennsylvania wants to change how voting occurs, the state must follow the law to do so."

"In the current appeal, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, dismissed the claim based on a legal doctrine called 'laches,' which essentially means the plaintiffs waited too long to bring the challenge," he continues. "But, the plaintiffs reasonably argue that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has not applied that doctrine consistently and so they cannot selectively enforce it now."

"Even more persuasively, the plaintiffs point out that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has also held that plaintiffs don't have standing to challenge an election law until after the election, meaning that the court effectively put them in a Catch-22: before the election, they lacked standing; after the election, they've delayed too long. The result of the court's gamesmanship is that a facially unconstitutional election law can never be judicially challenged"

Advertisement

Related:

JOE BIDEN TED CRUZ

You can read his full statement here.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement