It's America's 250th Birthday, So We're in for a Deluge of Leftist Drivel
How Democrats Sell Themselves to the Public
The Press Is All-in on the Algae Beat! And, a California Station Says...
Ghost of Alexis de Tocqueville Returns — What America Can Learn From Him
Who's to Blame for the Inner-City Mess?
Democrats Declare War on School Choice
The Humble Patent
The Left's Worst Political Miscalculation
Americans Should Welcome Legitimate Investigations Into Alleged Voter Registration Fraud
A Letter Home From Woke Summer Camp
The Big Apple Is Ripe for Rotten Democratic Socialism
America's Christian Revival Won’t Be Found at a 'Catholic' LGBT Conference
Federal Judge Declares That Common-Sense Election Integrity Is Illegal
Two More Arrested In Terror Plot Against White House UFC Event
TX Dem Bobby Pulido Brought Registered Sex Offender Bandmember to Middle School Concert
Tipsheet

Sen. Cruz Urges Emergency Appeal on Pennsylvania Court Challenge

Sen. Cruz Urges Emergency Appeal on Pennsylvania Court Challenge
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

An appeals court recently ruled that the Trump campaign cannot stop the certification of their election results. Joe Biden won the state by about 2 percent, according to the AP. But Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) is urging the Supreme Court to hear an emergency appeal on a Pennsylvania election challenge, citing concerns about statewide mail-in voting enacted by the state legislature.

Advertisement

Cruz shared the statement on his Twitter page.

Cruz blamed the Democrat Pennsylvania Supreme Court for the change, and argued why it deserves to be analyzed.

"The appeal argues that Pennsylvania cannot change the range in the middle of the game," he wrote. "If Pennsylvania wants to change how voting occurs, the state must follow the law to do so."

"In the current appeal, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, dismissed the claim based on a legal doctrine called 'laches,' which essentially means the plaintiffs waited too long to bring the challenge," he continues. "But, the plaintiffs reasonably argue that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has not applied that doctrine consistently and so they cannot selectively enforce it now."

"Even more persuasively, the plaintiffs point out that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has also held that plaintiffs don't have standing to challenge an election law until after the election, meaning that the court effectively put them in a Catch-22: before the election, they lacked standing; after the election, they've delayed too long. The result of the court's gamesmanship is that a facially unconstitutional election law can never be judicially challenged"

Advertisement

Related:

JOE BIDEN TED CRUZ

You can read his full statement here.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement