Florida’s DCF Took Their Children—And the Supreme Court Just Turned Its Back on...
Trump Administration Just Made the Most Significant Drug Policy Change in Decades
Trump's Navy Just Sent a Brutal Message to Iran on the High Seas
Wisconsin's Lt. Governor Vows to Craft State Budgets in Secret If She Succeeds...
Audit Shows Seattle Followed the California Model of Dealing With Homelessness
Detroit Is So Far Gone, Officials Are Begging Criminals Not to Steal These
Not One Democrat Supports Michigan's House Judiciary Committee Efforts to Protect Kids Fro...
A Loophole in Pennsylvania Law Allowed a Registered Sex Offender to Become a...
That Thing That Never Happens Happened Again, and a Mexican National Faces Deportation...
What America Can Learn From Australia About Treating Veterans With MDMA
SPLC, Swalwell, and the War for America's Minds
Tennessee Town Benefits From Strong Gun Industry Protections in State
Chuck Schumer Gets Put in His Place After Claiming Nobody Respects ICE or...
President Trump's Trump Card: Kharg Island
The SPLC Owed Us an Apology -- A Federal Grand Jury Just Handed...
Tipsheet

Sen. Cruz Urges Emergency Appeal on Pennsylvania Court Challenge

Sen. Cruz Urges Emergency Appeal on Pennsylvania Court Challenge
AP Photo/Andrew Harnik

An appeals court recently ruled that the Trump campaign cannot stop the certification of their election results. Joe Biden won the state by about 2 percent, according to the AP. But Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) is urging the Supreme Court to hear an emergency appeal on a Pennsylvania election challenge, citing concerns about statewide mail-in voting enacted by the state legislature.

Advertisement

Cruz shared the statement on his Twitter page.

Cruz blamed the Democrat Pennsylvania Supreme Court for the change, and argued why it deserves to be analyzed.

"The appeal argues that Pennsylvania cannot change the range in the middle of the game," he wrote. "If Pennsylvania wants to change how voting occurs, the state must follow the law to do so."

"In the current appeal, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, dismissed the claim based on a legal doctrine called 'laches,' which essentially means the plaintiffs waited too long to bring the challenge," he continues. "But, the plaintiffs reasonably argue that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has not applied that doctrine consistently and so they cannot selectively enforce it now."

"Even more persuasively, the plaintiffs point out that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has also held that plaintiffs don't have standing to challenge an election law until after the election, meaning that the court effectively put them in a Catch-22: before the election, they lacked standing; after the election, they've delayed too long. The result of the court's gamesmanship is that a facially unconstitutional election law can never be judicially challenged"

Advertisement

Related:

JOE BIDEN TED CRUZ

You can read his full statement here.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement