Make America the 1990s Again
Salem Radio Network Now Has a One-Two Punch Against Liberal America in the...
White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles Felt 'Blindsided' by Vanity Fair Article
Yes, Progressives Really Did This on the Anniversary of the Boston Tea Party
Who Is Mustapha Kourbach? And Why Is Brown University Scrubbing His Entire Existence...
What John Fetterman Said to Chris Cuomo Is Going to Trigger Another Dem...
Why the Labor Market Is Stronger Than Experts Think
'Avner's Is Closed': Jewish Bagel Shop Shutters Doors Thanks to Ongoing Threats, Antisemit...
Keir Starmer Says Violence Against Women and Girls a 'National Emergency' (Guess What...
When Process Fails Justice
A $600 Billion Gift to Wall Street, Paid for by the Public
Okay, the Jews Leave…and Then?
Another Year, Another $2 Trillion in Debt
Texas News Vlogger Asks SCOTUS to Decide Whether Criminalizing Journalism Is 'Obviously Un...
The Hidden Public Safety Engine That Doesn’t Cost Taxpayers a Dime
Tipsheet

'Unlawful from its Inception': Justice Thomas Rips DACA Decision

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

In 2017, President Trump cancelled his predecessor's order to allow illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. before age 16 to apply for protection from deportation. On Thursday, SCOTUS ruled that Trump's move was was "arbitrary and capricious" and that the DACA program would be upheld. Chief Justice Roberts, always a swing vote, swung in the direction of the court's four liberal justices. In their ruling, the justices note that they did not rule on the merits of the case, but on the procedure the Trump administration used to try and rescind DACA.

Advertisement

In the primary dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas reasoned why his colleagues were way off base. In the first place, he notes, Obama's DACA program was unconstitutional.

"DHS created DACA during the Obama administration without any statutory authorization and without going  through the requisite rulemaking process," Thomas argues. "As a result, the program was unlawful from its inception."

Yet, "under the auspices of today’s decision, administrations can bind their successors by unlawfully adopting significant legal changes through Executive Branch agency memoranda."

"Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision," he later adds.

Advertisement

At issue here is whether emotion has replaced the law. Liberal lawmakers argue it's inhumane to send DREAMers away, especially since for some of them the U.S. is the only home they've ever known and they were brought here through no fault of their own. But for conservatives, it's a matter of maintaining law and order. And Justice Thomas forcefully communicated the latter sentiment.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos