There's an Eerie Silence From Frey and Walz Over Don Lemon's Church Storming...
CNN Guest Was So Mad About Scott Jennings Wrecking Her Narrative That She...
Jasmine Crockett Might Be Getting Nervous After This Poll
Here's How Republicans Feel About Trump's Greenland Plan
Exclusive: Bombshell Footage Claims Judges Can Be Bought With Bribes in Ohio Immigration...
Flashback: Here's What Don Lemon Once Said About the Kidnapping and Torture of...
Activist Tried Going Toe-to-Toe With Scott Jennings. It Did Not Go Well for...
AG Uthmeier: Man Accused of Killing Three Near Disney Had Prior Charges Dismissed...
Dr. Oz Sounds the Alarm About Another Type of Fraud in CA
Minnesota Nurses Association Urges Medical Professionals to Join Anti-ICE Protests
Justice Department Indicts Four Houston-Area Rideshare Drivers in Kidnapping Scheme
Pennsylvania Dairy Farmers Celebrate the Whole Milk Act
Keith Ellison Defends Church Storming As 'Free Speech' After ICE Protest Shuts Down...
Trump Blasts the Media for Its ICE Obsession, While Tim Walz's Fraud Fades...
China Begins Conducting Massive Military Movements Inside Iran
Tipsheet

'Unlawful from its Inception': Justice Thomas Rips DACA Decision

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

In 2017, President Trump cancelled his predecessor's order to allow illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. before age 16 to apply for protection from deportation. On Thursday, SCOTUS ruled that Trump's move was was "arbitrary and capricious" and that the DACA program would be upheld. Chief Justice Roberts, always a swing vote, swung in the direction of the court's four liberal justices. In their ruling, the justices note that they did not rule on the merits of the case, but on the procedure the Trump administration used to try and rescind DACA.

Advertisement

In the primary dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas reasoned why his colleagues were way off base. In the first place, he notes, Obama's DACA program was unconstitutional.

"DHS created DACA during the Obama administration without any statutory authorization and without going  through the requisite rulemaking process," Thomas argues. "As a result, the program was unlawful from its inception."

Yet, "under the auspices of today’s decision, administrations can bind their successors by unlawfully adopting significant legal changes through Executive Branch agency memoranda."

"Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision," he later adds.

Advertisement

At issue here is whether emotion has replaced the law. Liberal lawmakers argue it's inhumane to send DREAMers away, especially since for some of them the U.S. is the only home they've ever known and they were brought here through no fault of their own. But for conservatives, it's a matter of maintaining law and order. And Justice Thomas forcefully communicated the latter sentiment.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos