How You Know This Major Newspaper Doesn't Feel Good About Kamala
Latest Poll of Young Black and Latino Male Voters Has to Embarrass Dems
Kamala's Insane Talking Points
Jake Tapper Demeans Gold Star Family, and the Press Attempts Another Failed October...
Donald Trump, Class Traitor Par Excellence
Conservation Is on the Ballot in Three States This Year
CNN's Town Hall Leans into Boosting Kamala
The Democratic Party's Bad October
Kamala Is the Bigger Threat to the Constitutional Order
Democrats Attack Free Speech—Again
America’s International Decline Can No Longer Be Ignored
Trump's Rosebud 2024: An Insurrection or a Resurrection?
Mysterious CCP Supply Chains are Cause for Concern
Wall Street Places Its Bet on Trump, and We Couldn't Agree More
Kamala Opposed Anti-Gang Measure That Californians Overwhelmingly Supported
Tipsheet

'Unlawful from its Inception': Justice Thomas Rips DACA Decision

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

In 2017, President Trump cancelled his predecessor's order to allow illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. before age 16 to apply for protection from deportation. On Thursday, SCOTUS ruled that Trump's move was was "arbitrary and capricious" and that the DACA program would be upheld. Chief Justice Roberts, always a swing vote, swung in the direction of the court's four liberal justices. In their ruling, the justices note that they did not rule on the merits of the case, but on the procedure the Trump administration used to try and rescind DACA.

Advertisement

In the primary dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas reasoned why his colleagues were way off base. In the first place, he notes, Obama's DACA program was unconstitutional.

"DHS created DACA during the Obama administration without any statutory authorization and without going  through the requisite rulemaking process," Thomas argues. "As a result, the program was unlawful from its inception."

Yet, "under the auspices of today’s decision, administrations can bind their successors by unlawfully adopting significant legal changes through Executive Branch agency memoranda."

"Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision," he later adds.

Advertisement

At issue here is whether emotion has replaced the law. Liberal lawmakers argue it's inhumane to send DREAMers away, especially since for some of them the U.S. is the only home they've ever known and they were brought here through no fault of their own. But for conservatives, it's a matter of maintaining law and order. And Justice Thomas forcefully communicated the latter sentiment.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement