The Media Lost Its Mind Over Trump's Remarks About White South Africans
St. Louis' Emergency Management Director Placed on Leave After She Forgot to Sound...
Let’s Roll the Dice on Primarying These RINOs
Two Israeli Embassy Staffers Assassinated in DC Tonight
Democrats Always Rally Around The Worst People
Re-writers of the Record Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson Are Sternly Corrected by...
Uncover the Cover-ups
The Astonishing Chutzpah of CNN's Jake Tapper
4 Big Questions About Joe Biden's Health Cover-Up
Tell Me Why You Lied to Me
Antinatalism: The Latest Destructive Ideology That Must Be Eradicated
The MAHA Movement and the Hidden Truth About Abortion
Dear Senator Whitehouse, EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin is Right
Make the Second Amendment Great Again – Appoint a Czar to Enforce It
Accountability for McIver? Mace Files Motion to Expel Congresswoman After She's Been Feder...
Tipsheet

'Unlawful from its Inception': Justice Thomas Rips DACA Decision

AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

In 2017, President Trump cancelled his predecessor's order to allow illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. before age 16 to apply for protection from deportation. On Thursday, SCOTUS ruled that Trump's move was was "arbitrary and capricious" and that the DACA program would be upheld. Chief Justice Roberts, always a swing vote, swung in the direction of the court's four liberal justices. In their ruling, the justices note that they did not rule on the merits of the case, but on the procedure the Trump administration used to try and rescind DACA.

Advertisement

In the primary dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas reasoned why his colleagues were way off base. In the first place, he notes, Obama's DACA program was unconstitutional.

"DHS created DACA during the Obama administration without any statutory authorization and without going  through the requisite rulemaking process," Thomas argues. "As a result, the program was unlawful from its inception."

Yet, "under the auspices of today’s decision, administrations can bind their successors by unlawfully adopting significant legal changes through Executive Branch agency memoranda."

"Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision," he later adds.

Advertisement

At issue here is whether emotion has replaced the law. Liberal lawmakers argue it's inhumane to send DREAMers away, especially since for some of them the U.S. is the only home they've ever known and they were brought here through no fault of their own. But for conservatives, it's a matter of maintaining law and order. And Justice Thomas forcefully communicated the latter sentiment.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement