Cubans Make Shocking Plea to Trump
What God Does James Talarico Worship?
You Won't Believe What Whoopi Goldberg Said About Trump's Military Action Against Iran
Ted Cruz Says This Threat Has 'Never Been Higher'
U.S. Oil and Gas Association Has a Message for Gavin Newsom
There's a Clear Frontrunner in California's Governor Race, but It's Not Who You'd...
Democrats Are 'Serene' With Making Americans Suffer Amid Shutdown
The Left's Personhood Paradox
Abby Phillip Issues Lame Apology After Lying About ISIS-Inspired NYC Bombers
CBS News Exposed the Massive California Hospice Fraud Happening on Gavin Newsom's Watch
Iran Threatens to Force Oil Prices Over $200 a Barrel
The February Inflation Report Is Here
Doug Burgum Slams Gavin Newsom for Blaming Trump for California Gas Prices
Trump Issues a Stark Warning to Iran Over the Straight of Hormuz
Undercover Videos Reveal New Mexico Schools Enable Trans, Abortion Activism With In-House...
Tipsheet

'Unlawful from its Inception': Justice Thomas Rips DACA Decision

'Unlawful from its Inception': Justice Thomas Rips DACA Decision
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

In 2017, President Trump cancelled his predecessor's order to allow illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. before age 16 to apply for protection from deportation. On Thursday, SCOTUS ruled that Trump's move was was "arbitrary and capricious" and that the DACA program would be upheld. Chief Justice Roberts, always a swing vote, swung in the direction of the court's four liberal justices. In their ruling, the justices note that they did not rule on the merits of the case, but on the procedure the Trump administration used to try and rescind DACA.

Advertisement

In the primary dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas reasoned why his colleagues were way off base. In the first place, he notes, Obama's DACA program was unconstitutional.

"DHS created DACA during the Obama administration without any statutory authorization and without going  through the requisite rulemaking process," Thomas argues. "As a result, the program was unlawful from its inception."

Yet, "under the auspices of today’s decision, administrations can bind their successors by unlawfully adopting significant legal changes through Executive Branch agency memoranda."

"Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision," he later adds.

Advertisement

At issue here is whether emotion has replaced the law. Liberal lawmakers argue it's inhumane to send DREAMers away, especially since for some of them the U.S. is the only home they've ever known and they were brought here through no fault of their own. But for conservatives, it's a matter of maintaining law and order. And Justice Thomas forcefully communicated the latter sentiment.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement