'That Doesn't Make Much Sense': Watch a Fox News Host Obliterate a Leftist's...
Zohran Mamdani Reportedly Plotting Whether He Can Arrest Benjamin Netanyahu
Trump White House Scores Massive Win in Election Integrity Fight
You're Gonna Laugh Your Head Off When You Hear About Don Lemon's Political...
This Republican Senator Just Declared That He Will Tank SAVE America Act
James Talarico's Smear Job on Ken Paxton Crashed and Burned When a Victim's...
The Odyssey Review: Nolan's Epic Failure
David Crowley Returns to WI Governor's Race As Democrats Continue to Panic
Former Marine Charged With Threatening to Kill Trump
Ralph Norman Jumps Into SC Senate Race After Trump Backs Darline Graham
Two U.S. Service Members Killed, One Missing After Iranian Missile and Drone Attack...
Illegal Alien Sentenced to Four Years for 28-Year Identity Theft Scheme
Iran Just Killed the Memorandum of Understanding
92-Year-Old Man Goes Viral After Heartwarming Story About Post-Retirement Employment
Mamdani's Regime Is About to Destroy Small Businesses and His Cronies Are Bragging...
Tipsheet

'Unlawful from its Inception': Justice Thomas Rips DACA Decision

'Unlawful from its Inception': Justice Thomas Rips DACA Decision
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

In 2017, President Trump cancelled his predecessor's order to allow illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. before age 16 to apply for protection from deportation. On Thursday, SCOTUS ruled that Trump's move was was "arbitrary and capricious" and that the DACA program would be upheld. Chief Justice Roberts, always a swing vote, swung in the direction of the court's four liberal justices. In their ruling, the justices note that they did not rule on the merits of the case, but on the procedure the Trump administration used to try and rescind DACA.

Advertisement

In the primary dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas reasoned why his colleagues were way off base. In the first place, he notes, Obama's DACA program was unconstitutional.

"DHS created DACA during the Obama administration without any statutory authorization and without going  through the requisite rulemaking process," Thomas argues. "As a result, the program was unlawful from its inception."

Yet, "under the auspices of today’s decision, administrations can bind their successors by unlawfully adopting significant legal changes through Executive Branch agency memoranda."

"Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision," he later adds.

Advertisement

At issue here is whether emotion has replaced the law. Liberal lawmakers argue it's inhumane to send DREAMers away, especially since for some of them the U.S. is the only home they've ever known and they were brought here through no fault of their own. But for conservatives, it's a matter of maintaining law and order. And Justice Thomas forcefully communicated the latter sentiment.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement