Guess Who Just Launched Airstrikes Against Iran
Kevin Warsh Is One Step Closer to Becoming the Next Fed Chair
The VA Dems Want the Supreme Court to Restore Their Gerrymandered Map. Here's...
CNN Lied About Our Client—Now It’s Before the U.S. Supreme Court
This Republican Senator Just Exposed the Banking Cartel's Efforts to Weaponize Government...
Leftist White Guilt Is Getting People Killed
Minnesota Supreme Court Grapples with Questions About Mental Illness Disqualifying Gun Own...
Nithya Raman Blames Everyone, Including Trump, for LA's Disastrous Condition. Take a Look...
Jonathan Turley Responds to the Democrats Insane Plan to Punish the Virginia Supreme...
Where's the Justice For Victims of Violent Crime?
Career Criminal Goes on Shooting Spree in Massachusetts
This Democrat Mayor Just Came Clean About Working For Communist China
The Supreme Court Just Gave Republicans Another Major Win on Redistricting
The Trump Administration Just Put the United Nations in Their Place on Mass...
Top Zelensky Official Charged in Major Corruption Probe
Tipsheet

'Unlawful from its Inception': Justice Thomas Rips DACA Decision

'Unlawful from its Inception': Justice Thomas Rips DACA Decision
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

In 2017, President Trump cancelled his predecessor's order to allow illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. before age 16 to apply for protection from deportation. On Thursday, SCOTUS ruled that Trump's move was was "arbitrary and capricious" and that the DACA program would be upheld. Chief Justice Roberts, always a swing vote, swung in the direction of the court's four liberal justices. In their ruling, the justices note that they did not rule on the merits of the case, but on the procedure the Trump administration used to try and rescind DACA.

Advertisement

In the primary dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas reasoned why his colleagues were way off base. In the first place, he notes, Obama's DACA program was unconstitutional.

"DHS created DACA during the Obama administration without any statutory authorization and without going  through the requisite rulemaking process," Thomas argues. "As a result, the program was unlawful from its inception."

Yet, "under the auspices of today’s decision, administrations can bind their successors by unlawfully adopting significant legal changes through Executive Branch agency memoranda."

"Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision," he later adds.

Advertisement

At issue here is whether emotion has replaced the law. Liberal lawmakers argue it's inhumane to send DREAMers away, especially since for some of them the U.S. is the only home they've ever known and they were brought here through no fault of their own. But for conservatives, it's a matter of maintaining law and order. And Justice Thomas forcefully communicated the latter sentiment.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement