The Libertarians Are Back at It Again
An Assault Weapons Ban Is Heading to Spanberger's Desk. Here's What to Expect.
CNN's Scott Jennings Just Took a Blowtorch to the Dems' Reasons for Shutting...
Why This Clip of Some Stupid Lib Spewing Nonsense Before the NYC IED...
What Answer Was This Dem Supposed to Give When Asked This Question?
Is the Panic About Iran Political, Practical, or Even Real?
Look Who Zohran Mamdani Just Invited to Dinner
For the Love of the Game, for the Love of Country
Using Religion to Win Votes
A Total Disgrace
Senate’s Inaction on the Save America Act Cannot Be Ignored
Reviving America’s Dying Sense of Humor
Epic Fury Is Legal and It Is America First
For Saudi Arabia and the U.S., Friendship Requires Accountability Over Past Harms
Texas Shooter Exposes Huge Blind Spots in Immigration Vetting
Tipsheet

'Unlawful from its Inception': Justice Thomas Rips DACA Decision

'Unlawful from its Inception': Justice Thomas Rips DACA Decision
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

In 2017, President Trump cancelled his predecessor's order to allow illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. before age 16 to apply for protection from deportation. On Thursday, SCOTUS ruled that Trump's move was was "arbitrary and capricious" and that the DACA program would be upheld. Chief Justice Roberts, always a swing vote, swung in the direction of the court's four liberal justices. In their ruling, the justices note that they did not rule on the merits of the case, but on the procedure the Trump administration used to try and rescind DACA.

Advertisement

In the primary dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas reasoned why his colleagues were way off base. In the first place, he notes, Obama's DACA program was unconstitutional.

"DHS created DACA during the Obama administration without any statutory authorization and without going  through the requisite rulemaking process," Thomas argues. "As a result, the program was unlawful from its inception."

Yet, "under the auspices of today’s decision, administrations can bind their successors by unlawfully adopting significant legal changes through Executive Branch agency memoranda."

"Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision," he later adds.

Advertisement

At issue here is whether emotion has replaced the law. Liberal lawmakers argue it's inhumane to send DREAMers away, especially since for some of them the U.S. is the only home they've ever known and they were brought here through no fault of their own. But for conservatives, it's a matter of maintaining law and order. And Justice Thomas forcefully communicated the latter sentiment.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement