Let's Rid Ourselves From Thomas Massie Once and for All
Federal Judge Shuts Down TN Dems Over New Congressional Map
Senate Parliamentarian Just Delivered Some Brutal News About the Reconciliation Package
Nicholas Kristof's Motte-and-Bailey Fallacy
AOC: New Leader of the Democrat Party?
A Society Without God Is a Society Without Truth
Can-Do Nation
Kamala's 'Brainstorm' Is Destroying All the Norms
Who Wins the Re-Redistricted House?
MAHA Plan for the World
America Just Told the UN to Pound Sand on Replacement Migration
Democrats’ Court-Packing Threats in Virginia Are Practice for the U.S. Supreme Court
Why Americans Support Mass Deportation but Struggle With the Process
Man Convicted of Running Chinese Police Station in Manhattan's Chinatown
FBI Offers $200K Reward for Former Air Force Agent Who Defected to Iran
Tipsheet

'Unlawful from its Inception': Justice Thomas Rips DACA Decision

'Unlawful from its Inception': Justice Thomas Rips DACA Decision
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

In 2017, President Trump cancelled his predecessor's order to allow illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. before age 16 to apply for protection from deportation. On Thursday, SCOTUS ruled that Trump's move was was "arbitrary and capricious" and that the DACA program would be upheld. Chief Justice Roberts, always a swing vote, swung in the direction of the court's four liberal justices. In their ruling, the justices note that they did not rule on the merits of the case, but on the procedure the Trump administration used to try and rescind DACA.

Advertisement

In the primary dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas reasoned why his colleagues were way off base. In the first place, he notes, Obama's DACA program was unconstitutional.

"DHS created DACA during the Obama administration without any statutory authorization and without going  through the requisite rulemaking process," Thomas argues. "As a result, the program was unlawful from its inception."

Yet, "under the auspices of today’s decision, administrations can bind their successors by unlawfully adopting significant legal changes through Executive Branch agency memoranda."

"Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision," he later adds.

Advertisement

At issue here is whether emotion has replaced the law. Liberal lawmakers argue it's inhumane to send DREAMers away, especially since for some of them the U.S. is the only home they've ever known and they were brought here through no fault of their own. But for conservatives, it's a matter of maintaining law and order. And Justice Thomas forcefully communicated the latter sentiment.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement