There's an Update on the Kind of Classified Information Biden Mishandled
There Was a Serious Problem With Joe Biden's 'Uncle Eaten By Cannibals' Story
An NPR Editor Had the Perfect 'I Told You So' Moment
Whistleblower Alleges Biden Is Endangering American Forces in Niger
BREAKING: Senate Dems Torpedo Mayorkas Impeachment
Math Is Hard for WNBA Fans
Merrick Garland Accused of Letting Hunter Biden Get Off Easy. Sen. Kennedy Demands...
Trump Is Gaining Speed With the Group That Biden Needs the Most Support...
MSNBC Host Makes Trump Prosecution About Racial Diversity
Wait Until You Hear What One of the Prospective 'Unbiased' Trump Trial Jurors...
Netanyahu's 9-Word Warning to Terrorist-Backed Iran
Columbia University President Responds to Claims of Anti-Semitism on Campus
House Has 'Sole Power of Impeachment': Comer Issues Key Reminder to WH Over...
Law Enforcement Officials Reveal How Biden’s Policies Enable Criminal Illegal Aliens
Biden's Speech in Scranton Was Full of Some Pretty Bad Moments
Tipsheet

'Minority Rights Are Dead': Doug Collins Explodes After Nadler Refuses to Hear His Point of Order

AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

House Judiciary Committee ranking member Doug Collins interrupted Chairman Jerry Nadler at Thursday's articles of impeachment hearing with a point of order. For the umpteenth time since the impeachment inquiry against President Trump began, Democrats have ignored Republicans' request for a separate minority hearing so they can question their own set of witnesses. 

Advertisement

Nadler explained why he would be ignoring Collins's point of order. First, he argued, there is "no precedent" for it. Back when the Democrats were in the minority, no Republicans lobbied for them to have their own minority hearings. When former Chairman Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI) did schedule a minority day hearing back in 2005, he had a hissy fit and "shut off" the microphones and the lights, preventing witness testimony. As a result "there is no committee practice or precedent" supporting the practice here, Nadler said.

What proceeded was a debate over the rules of the committee.

Collins observed that, judging by Nadler's "lengthy answer," his point of order had clearly "struck a nerve." It is not the chairman's right to decide whether hearings are sufficient or not, the ranking member said.

Nadler insisted, "I ruled that the point of order is not well taken."

"That's painfully obvious," Collins responded.

The motion was tabled, and when Nadler asked the members to vote aye or nay, Collins yelled loudly, "Nope!" so everyone could hear him.

Sen. Ted Deutch (D-FL) accused Collins of mischaracterizing the committee's history. “There’s no right to a separate day” for a minority hearing, he insisted.

Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-AZ) had a copy of the rules before her too, however, and was just as outraged as the ranking member that Nadler had again rejected the Republicans' request for a minority hearing. 

Advertisement

"It says in the rules that you require to set a date for a minority hearing," she read. Yet, here the rules "have been thrown out of the window."

"I just can't believe it," Lesko said.

The congresswoman said she was denied access several times to the closed door hearings held by House Intelligence Committee Adam Schiff, who by the way shouldn't have led this impeachment inquiry in the first place. That has typically been a job for the Judiciary.

The committee has not had "one single fact witness in this committee at all," Lesko said. And yet, she's "expected to vote on the articles today?"

On the GOP's list of preferred witnesses in the inquiry include Chairman Schiff, and the whistleblower who filed the complaint against Trump.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement