Jasmine Crockett's 'Hot Wheels' Narrative About Greg Abbott Just Imploded
The Kids Are All Right-Wing
DEI Is Dying
Maxine vs. Melania
Bongino’s FBI U-Turn: Proof The Bureau Is Back In The Fight
Trump Should End the Biden-Era War on Small Business Partnerships
Fix Social Security With American Principles -- Ownership
Democracy Is Not Enough
China Deserves the Trump Tariffs
Restoring America’s Borders Is Expensive but Worth It
Now Is the Time for a John Adams Memorial
Election Integrity Gains at State Level
Bigger Is Only Sometimes Better
How Mississippi Eliminated the Income Tax
Trump Can Help Reclaim the California Dream
Tipsheet

Brian Stelter Analyzes Why Fox News Unveiled 'Fox Nation'

Fox News unveiled its new streaming service "Fox Nation" this week. For $5.99 a month, subscribers can enjoy programming from the likes of popular Fox contributors like Tomi Lahren, Dana Perino, Greg Gutfeld, and the duo of the "Benson and Harf" radio show, former Obama State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf and Townhall's own Guy Benson. It will offer plenty of exclusive content as well. You can read more about the new streaming service here.

Advertisement

CNN's Brian Stelter surmised why the network decided to introduce the new service. His analysis began with the subhead, "Birth of a Fox Nation," (which I hope was not a reference to "Birth of a Nation.") Stelter predicts the streaming service will be a hit and be a huge revenue stream, or "undermine the core business."

He also sounded off on how Fox is becoming a "filter prison."

A purer form of the drug

"When Fox News isn't Fox News-y enough for you." That's not the slogan for Fox Nation, but perhaps it could be. As Michael Grynbaum put it in this New York Times story, "Fox Nation may be the id of Fox News." There will be documentaries about Robert Bork and Benghazi. Twice a day segments by Tomi Lahren. Cameos from Sean Hannity and others. Fox says the service is for "superfans" -- a/k/a the viewers most committed to the cause.

I understand the business rationale, but I wonder how the people in charge -- including, or perhaps especially, the Murdochs -- justify actually going through with that business rationale. Throwing fuel on a fire might make good business sense for the Murdochs right now; that doesn't mean they should do it.

I worry that this streaming service is yet another step into a tribalized, fragmented society. The filter bubble is feeling more and more like a filter prison...

Advertisement

As you might expect, Stelter's assessment was met with social media users who accused him of being blind to his own network's bias - particularly this week.

As for Trump, he suggested the government have its own news network.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement