How the Dems Plan to Counter the Supreme Court's Ruling on the Voting...
Wait, Eric Swalwell Is Contacting His Accusers?
Here's the Question That Caused Seattle's Mayor to Flee an Interview
Justice Alito's Just Took Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Cleaners
Bill Maher Pretty Much Tells His UK Guest That Her Country Has Become...
Is This Why 60 Minutes Dropped This Segment About Disaster Relief and White...
Mayor Pete's Electoral College Remarks Shows He Still Doesn't Know His A** From...
Randi Weingarten Isn't Worried About Falling Math or Reading Scores. Here's What She's...
The Guy Who Vetoed Antisemitism Legislation Wants Us to Know He's Deeply Offended...
Guess Why a Chicago Alderman Wants to Charge Walgreens With Crimes
The Quiet Man
The Fathomless Funds of the Treasury
Time for Jerome Powell to Go Home
It Must Be True! I Read It in The New York Times!
Classic Essay 'I, Pencil' Revisited
Tipsheet

Catholic Jesuit Paper Rescinds its Kavanaugh Endorsement

Catholic Jesuit Paper Rescinds its Kavanaugh Endorsement

America: The Jesuit Review, a Catholic Jesuit magazine, didn't like what it heard during Thursday's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. "It is time for the Kavanaugh nomination to be withdrawn," the editors wrote in a new editorial published shortly after the committee adjourned. Their change of heart is notable because Kavanaugh graduated from Georgetown Prep, a Jesuit school.

Advertisement

The editors admit they "have no special insight into who is telling the truth." Still, it appears as though they've chosen a side.

If Dr. Blasey’s allegation is true, the assault and Judge Kavanaugh’s denial of it mean that he should not be seated on the U.S. Supreme Court. But even if the credibility of the allegation has not been established beyond a reasonable doubt and even if further investigation is warranted to determine its validity or clear Judge Kavanaugh’s name, we recognize that this nomination is no longer in the best interests of the country. While we previously endorsed the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh on the basis of his legal credentials and his reputation as a committed textualist, it is now clear that the nomination should be withdrawn.

His nomination, they declare, has become "a referendum on how to address allegations of sexual assault." They can't help but view the nomination in light of the "Me Too" era.

What is different this time is that this nomination battle is no longer purely about predicting the likely outcome of Judge Kavanaugh’s vote on the court. It now involves the symbolic meaning of his nomination and confirmation in the #MeToo era. The hearings and the committee’s deliberations are now also a bellwether of the way the country treats women when their reports of harassment, assault and abuse threaten to derail the careers of powerful men.

Advertisement

Related:

SEXUAL ASSAULT

At Thursday's hearing, Kavanaugh was a man determined to defend his honor. He vehemently denied all allegations against him, including those of Christine Blasey Ford, who had just testified before him. She accused him of sexually assaulting her in high school. She is "100 percent" certain it was Kavanaugh. He was just as certain that she has the wrong guy.

That may be true, but Kavanaugh bowing out of the Supreme Court running is "the best of the bad resolutions," the editors conclude. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement