Half a Nation of Traitors
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 329: Death in the Old Testament
Their Evil Knows No Bounds
Vance-Rubio or Rubio-Vance Is a Spectacular Ticket
Communism Versus the 10 Commandments
Big Tech’s Reckoning Is Here. Our Children Cannot Wait.
She Didn't 'Give Up' Her Child. She Made a Plan for Their Life.
‘SpudCell’ Proves Intelligent Design Needed for the Origin of Life
Scoular to Pay Over $10 Million to Resolve Border Bribery Scheme With Mexico
Meet Jimothy: The Bent-Backed Bandit Who Broke the Internet
US Hits Iran With New Wave of Airstrikes Following Jordan Attack
Rhode Island's Most Wanted Fugitive Caught After 20-Year Manhunt
The Maine Senate Debate Gave Us a Look at the Future of the...
Former Marine Charged With Threatening to Kill Trump
Ralph Norman Jumps Into SC Senate Race After Trump Backs Darline Graham
Tipsheet

Catholic Jesuit Paper Rescinds its Kavanaugh Endorsement

Catholic Jesuit Paper Rescinds its Kavanaugh Endorsement

America: The Jesuit Review, a Catholic Jesuit magazine, didn't like what it heard during Thursday's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. "It is time for the Kavanaugh nomination to be withdrawn," the editors wrote in a new editorial published shortly after the committee adjourned. Their change of heart is notable because Kavanaugh graduated from Georgetown Prep, a Jesuit school.

Advertisement

The editors admit they "have no special insight into who is telling the truth." Still, it appears as though they've chosen a side.

If Dr. Blasey’s allegation is true, the assault and Judge Kavanaugh’s denial of it mean that he should not be seated on the U.S. Supreme Court. But even if the credibility of the allegation has not been established beyond a reasonable doubt and even if further investigation is warranted to determine its validity or clear Judge Kavanaugh’s name, we recognize that this nomination is no longer in the best interests of the country. While we previously endorsed the nomination of Judge Kavanaugh on the basis of his legal credentials and his reputation as a committed textualist, it is now clear that the nomination should be withdrawn.

His nomination, they declare, has become "a referendum on how to address allegations of sexual assault." They can't help but view the nomination in light of the "Me Too" era.

What is different this time is that this nomination battle is no longer purely about predicting the likely outcome of Judge Kavanaugh’s vote on the court. It now involves the symbolic meaning of his nomination and confirmation in the #MeToo era. The hearings and the committee’s deliberations are now also a bellwether of the way the country treats women when their reports of harassment, assault and abuse threaten to derail the careers of powerful men.

Advertisement

Related:

SEXUAL ASSAULT

At Thursday's hearing, Kavanaugh was a man determined to defend his honor. He vehemently denied all allegations against him, including those of Christine Blasey Ford, who had just testified before him. She accused him of sexually assaulting her in high school. She is "100 percent" certain it was Kavanaugh. He was just as certain that she has the wrong guy.

That may be true, but Kavanaugh bowing out of the Supreme Court running is "the best of the bad resolutions," the editors conclude. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement