Black Commentator Has the Solution for the 'White People Problem' in America
Florida Supreme Court Hands Dems a Massive Loss in Fight Over New Congressional...
Some Guy Tried to Get Jerry Seinfeld to Say Something About Palestine. His...
Hakeem Jeffries Wants to Focus on the Economy but His Fellow Democrats Are...
Gunman Who Killed Minnesota Politicians Changes His Plea
Federal Judge Shuts Down Lawsuit Against Trump's 'Anti-Weaponization Fund'
Stop Destroying Civilization!
Democrats Can’t Even Admit CA Elections Aren’t Secure, and That’s the Real Problem
First Lady Melania Trump Unveils a Major New Financial Program for Foster Youth
Scott Bessent Just Escalated the Financial War on Iran
The White House Fraud Task Force Just Pulled Tens of Millions From Los...
Top Attorney Named As Tulsi Gabbard's Permanent Successor
This European World Cup Fan Discovers the Wonders of America's Southern Hospitality
Trump Reveals Why He's Canceling Iran Strikes
The Next Big Funding Bill Is About to Hit Congress. Here's Why Trump...
Tipsheet

Masterpiece Cakeshop Targeted Again for Refusing to Bake Another Cake He Doesn't Agree With

Masterpiece Cakeshop Targeted Again for Refusing to Bake Another Cake He Doesn't Agree With

Jack Phillips has been fighting to defend both his business, Masterpiece Cakeshop, and his religious beliefs for six years now, ever since he refused to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple. The couple sued, with the help of the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, and the case eventually reached the Supreme Court. In June, the justices ruled in favor of Phillips. Despite his decisive court win (7-2), the Colorado Civil Rights Commission is again trying to run him out of business.

Advertisement

On June 26, 2017, instead of a gay wedding cake, a transgender lawyer asked Phillips to bake a gender transition cake, which would be pink on the inside and blue on the outside to represent the transformation. Of course, Phillips could not honor the customer's request and was justifiably frustrated that the state keeps coming after him.

“The state is doubling down on its hostility against my beliefs, even though that’s what the Supreme Court said they couldn’t do,” Phillips said in a statement. “It seems I’m the only person in the state of Colorado who can’t live out my beliefs.”

Alliance Defending Freedom, who took on the first case against Phillips, is preparing to represent him as their client again. They too are fed up with Colorado's bias.

“It’s clear that the state of Colorado did not get the message from the Supreme Court, since it is still singling out Jack for punishment and showing hostility toward his religious beliefs,” ADF senior vice president Kristen Waggoner said in a statement.

The Supreme Court's June ruling was pretty crystal clear about what it thought of Colorado's bullying.

Advertisement

"The government, consistent with the Constitution’s guarantee of free exercise, cannot impose regulations that are hostile to the religious beliefs of affected citizens and cannot act in a manner that passes judgment upon or presupposes the illegitimacy of religious beliefs and practices."

Of course, it's hard not to think the accusing party did not walk into Phillips's bakery by chance.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement