Why the NYT Had to Issue a Monster Correction for This Piece About...
Why This Huffington Post Reporter's Good Friday Tweet Was Quite Embarrassing
The Iran Ceasefire Talks Have Imploded
Did You See That March Jobs Report?
Trump Reportedly Will Issue New Order That Will Pay Civilian Staffers for ICE/Border...
Ex-Biden Staffer Charged With Murder. Here's What Happened.
Chuck Schumer Is In Worse Trouble With His Party Than We Thought
Here's What I Want From the Next Attorney General
Colorado Springs Man Sentenced for Hate Crime Hoax That Probably Flipped the City's...
Plainclothes Miracle
Check Out This Kid's Hilarious Response to CNN When He's Asked Why He's...
America at 250: Rediscovering Exceptionalism in Rail and Space
Nine-Year Bid-Rigging Plot Inflated US Air Force Contracts by $37 Million
Barabbas or Bust
Prayer to Remove the Veil of Evil Darkness Over Iran
Tipsheet

Two Trump Judicial Nominees Criticized for Answers About Brown v. Board of Education

Two Trump Judicial Nominees Criticized for Answers About Brown v. Board of Education

Wednesday marked the 64-year anniversary of the historic Brown v. Board of Education ruling. The unanimous 9-0 Supreme Court decision declared that the "separate but equal" doctrine was unconstitutional and started the process of ending school segregation.

Advertisement

With the landmark decision's milestone, groups like Legal Defense Fund are demanding two Trump-nominated judicial nominees withdraw their names from consideration. The nominees, Wendy Vitter, nominated for a federal judgeship in New Orleans, and Andrew Oldham, nominated for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, "refused" to answer in their confirmation hearings whether Brown v. BOE was correctly decided.

Brown v. BOE "corrected an egregious error" in overruling Plessy v. Ferguson, Oldham said when asked by Sen. Richard Blumenthal in his confirmation hearing, but did not expand.

Wendy Vitter also did not provide an answer, telling Blumenthal during her own hearing that she "will respectfully not comment." She did, however, offer the following.

“It’s very easy to see Plessy v. Ferguson and to read Justice Harlan’s dissent which of course became the basis for Brown v. Board of Education and to look at that and say well that sounds very obvious to us now in 2018, that that was the right decision, but that’s hindsight, I have the benefit of that hindsight.”

Advertisement

Related:

RACE SEGREGATION

Still, "this is disqualifying, and her nomination must be withdrawn," the Defense Fund charges.

Some Democratic lawmakers agree. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) called it "disturbing."

The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Vitter's nomination Thursday.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement