Trump Slams 'Boring' Artists Who Bailed on Freedom 250 Concerts – Here's What...
Armed Suspect Shot After Holding Bank Customers Hostage for 15 Hours
Trump Just Confirmed What We Already Knew About J6
Reps. Ted Lieu and Sara Jacobs Turned Today's Foreign Affairs Committee Hearing Into...
Florida's Attorney General Is Going to Put an End to 'Teen Takeovers'
That Crazy Leftist Wisconsin Brewery Owner Will Not Be on November's Ballot
Every WI Democrat Running for Governor Would Repeal Act 10, and Here's What...
New Jersey Mayor Ras Baraka Says What Democrats Really Want to Do With...
Lawsuit Against New Jersey in Gun Confiscation Suit Expands
Roy Cooper Has a Terrible Record on Public Safety and Illegal Immigration
Trump Just Confirmed His Heated Phone Call With Benjamin Netanyahu
Here's the Latest From California’s Primary Elections
Not So Fast: Not All of the View Hosts Are Out on Platner...
Another Major Company Ditches Blue State For Texas
Meet the Democrat With Al-Qaeda Ties Who Just Won a Congressional Primary
Tipsheet

Two Trump Judicial Nominees Criticized for Answers About Brown v. Board of Education

Two Trump Judicial Nominees Criticized for Answers About Brown v. Board of Education

Wednesday marked the 64-year anniversary of the historic Brown v. Board of Education ruling. The unanimous 9-0 Supreme Court decision declared that the "separate but equal" doctrine was unconstitutional and started the process of ending school segregation.

Advertisement

With the landmark decision's milestone, groups like Legal Defense Fund are demanding two Trump-nominated judicial nominees withdraw their names from consideration. The nominees, Wendy Vitter, nominated for a federal judgeship in New Orleans, and Andrew Oldham, nominated for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, "refused" to answer in their confirmation hearings whether Brown v. BOE was correctly decided.

Brown v. BOE "corrected an egregious error" in overruling Plessy v. Ferguson, Oldham said when asked by Sen. Richard Blumenthal in his confirmation hearing, but did not expand.

Wendy Vitter also did not provide an answer, telling Blumenthal during her own hearing that she "will respectfully not comment." She did, however, offer the following.

“It’s very easy to see Plessy v. Ferguson and to read Justice Harlan’s dissent which of course became the basis for Brown v. Board of Education and to look at that and say well that sounds very obvious to us now in 2018, that that was the right decision, but that’s hindsight, I have the benefit of that hindsight.”

Advertisement

Related:

RACE SEGREGATION

Still, "this is disqualifying, and her nomination must be withdrawn," the Defense Fund charges.

Some Democratic lawmakers agree. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) called it "disturbing."

The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Vitter's nomination Thursday.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement