FIFA President Revealed Who His Special Guest Will Be for the Final. The...
It's Happening: New DNI Chief Preps Mass Firings
Zohran Mamdani Just Said This About What Should Happen to ICE
This Interview Shows Why We Despite the Leftist Media
James Talarico Says He's Inspired by This 'TransQueer Latinx' Theologian, and That'll Play...
Josh Shapiro Actually Said This About the Democratic Party
Following a Bloody Weekend, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Touts City's Bizarre Emergency D...
After Letting the Homeless Freeze to Death, Mamdani Announces 'Extreme Heat' Executive Ord...
Ted Cruz: AI Must Be Driven by Free Markets and Free Speech.
Tucker Carlson Is Done With the Republican Party. Good Riddance.
Spencer Pratt Compares Los Angeles' Fashion District to Milan's and It Was Simply...
Algae Can Only Survive Off What Others Create—Just Like the Left
PA House Democrats Advance Bill Restricting School Choice Programs
Talarico Offends Christians Yet Again by Claiming He 'Hates' Christianity
Guess Who Just Endorsed Graham Platner. The Irony Is Real.
Tipsheet

Two Trump Judicial Nominees Criticized for Answers About Brown v. Board of Education

Two Trump Judicial Nominees Criticized for Answers About Brown v. Board of Education

Wednesday marked the 64-year anniversary of the historic Brown v. Board of Education ruling. The unanimous 9-0 Supreme Court decision declared that the "separate but equal" doctrine was unconstitutional and started the process of ending school segregation.

Advertisement

With the landmark decision's milestone, groups like Legal Defense Fund are demanding two Trump-nominated judicial nominees withdraw their names from consideration. The nominees, Wendy Vitter, nominated for a federal judgeship in New Orleans, and Andrew Oldham, nominated for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, "refused" to answer in their confirmation hearings whether Brown v. BOE was correctly decided.

Brown v. BOE "corrected an egregious error" in overruling Plessy v. Ferguson, Oldham said when asked by Sen. Richard Blumenthal in his confirmation hearing, but did not expand.

Wendy Vitter also did not provide an answer, telling Blumenthal during her own hearing that she "will respectfully not comment." She did, however, offer the following.

“It’s very easy to see Plessy v. Ferguson and to read Justice Harlan’s dissent which of course became the basis for Brown v. Board of Education and to look at that and say well that sounds very obvious to us now in 2018, that that was the right decision, but that’s hindsight, I have the benefit of that hindsight.”

Advertisement

Related:

RACE SEGREGATION

Still, "this is disqualifying, and her nomination must be withdrawn," the Defense Fund charges.

Some Democratic lawmakers agree. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) called it "disturbing."

The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to vote on Vitter's nomination Thursday.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement