Trump's Navy Just Sent a Brutal Message to Iran on the High Seas
A Loophole in Pennsylvania Law Allowed a Registered Sex Offender to Become a...
That Thing That Never Happens Happened Again, and a Mexican National Faces Deportation...
Democratic Spokesman Hasan Piker Supports All Sorts of Crime As a Form of...
Check Out This Wild Hit in the Mariners' Game
Keith Ellison Can't Be Bothered to Care, Even for His Own Voters
Wisconsin Democrat Unveils Plan to Skyrocket State's Energy Bills
Senate Passes Resolution to Fund ICE, CBP and Sets Stage for Reconciliation Vote
East Villagers Are Regretting Their Overwhelming Vote for Zohran Mamdani
Xavier Becerra Vows to Make the Roads Unsafe If He's Elected California Governor
James Talarico Has a Message for Those of Us Who Don't Believe God...
It Turns Out A Lot of Arrested DACA Recipients Have Criminal Records
President Trump's Trump Card: Kharg Island
Resurfaced Clip of Charlie Kirk Goes Viral Following Bombshell Fraud Indictment Against SP...
Trump Orders the US Navy to 'Shoot and Kill' Any Iranian Vessel Laying...
Tipsheet

SCOTUS Considers Whether Maryland Dems Used Gerrymandering to Their Advantage

SCOTUS Considers Whether Maryland Dems Used Gerrymandering to Their Advantage

Gov. Larry Hogan hopes that today will be the day the Supreme Court starts to put an end to the "partisan gerrymandering" in his state.

Advertisement

At issue in Benisek vs. Lamone is whether Democrats changed district lines in Maryland in 2011 to beat a GOP congressman. Hogan signed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the Republican plaintiffs.

But Democrats are the ones under the court’s microscope in the Maryland case, which centers on a unique legal theory: That, in tweaking the borders of a western Maryland-based congressional district, the Democratic-controlled Legislature and then-Gov. Martin O’Malley were punishing voters for supporting Republicans in the past, including then-GOP Rep. Roscoe Bartlett. That punishment, the plaintiff’s theory says, amounts to a violation of their First Amendment rights.

“The map drawers and Democratic leaders in Annapolis in 2010 and 2011 looked at the way voters had cast their ballots in the 6th District in the years before redistricting and in effect disapproved that,” said Michael Kimberly, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs in the case. (Politico)

If the trend continues, 2020 "could be a wave election for Democrats," according to Michael Li, a redistricting expert at the Brennan Center in New York.

Gerrymandering has also been a hot topic in the state of Pennsylvania this year, where the redistricting maps again appear to favor Democrats. The state Supreme Court drew the new maps and, despite an emergency appeal from Republicans, who claimed the court overstepped its authority, the maps were upheld by the Supreme Court. 

Advertisement

Related:

MARYLAND

The Washington Examiner's Tim Carney published an opinion piece last month explaining the absurdity of the Maryland maps being considered at the Supreme Court today. Garrett County, he notes, has little to nothing in common with Bethesda. Yet, they find themselves in the same congressional district. It is an "abomination."

Then you have Maryland's third congressional district, which is so screwy that is has been given the nickname "praying mantis."

The ruling in the Maryland case is expected to come in June.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement