This Bill Maher Episode Was Wild...and the Libs Are Not Going to Like...
Caitlin Clark Is Making Other WNBA Coaches Post Delusional Nonsense on Social Media
It Was Clear Kathy Hochul Was Not Welcome Here
We Shouldn't Be Shocked If the Venezuela Earthquakes Wiped Out Tens of Thousands...
Why Janice Dean Got Forced Into Retirement
Gavin Newsom Just Took This Stupid Billionaire Tax Idea to a Whole New...
One Dead After Eight People Overdose While DC Struggles to Combat Opioid Addiction
Too Little, Too Late: The NYT Let Chevalier’s Radical History Slide Until After...
Trump Taps Oklahoma Former Marine Lance Schroyer to Lead ICE
This South Dakota Democrat May Have Lost by Just Two Votes
DOJ Sues Four States That Refused to Hand Over SNAP Data
The U.S.'s Path to the World Cup Final Is Here and It's Not...
San Francisco Trans March Turns on One of California's Most Radical Progressive Democrat
Alaska Judge Rules That Bogus Democrat-Recruited Senate Candidate Can Remain on Ballot
Texas Democrats Have a Plan to Beat Ken Paxton: Calling Talarico's Supporters Gay...
Tipsheet

The Guardian Defends Hillary: Having a Husband 'Trumped the Sisterhood'

The Guardian Defends Hillary: Having a Husband 'Trumped the Sisterhood'

Hillary Clinton suggested last week that husbands pressured their wives to vote for her opponent in the 2016 election. She then said that women "disrespected themselves" by voting for Donald Trump. Critics snickered at her latest excuse, but an editor at The Guardian said not so fast - Clinton may be on to something.

Advertisement

“Conventional wisdom says women will show solidarity at the polls," Lucia Graves writes. "But new research shows that for white women, having a husband trumped the sisterhood.”

People might scoff at the idea that women vote based on what husbands and fathers tell them to do. And tens of millions of dollars in political messaging has been spent based on the assumption that women will vote collectively on equal pay, abortion, and other salient issues regarding women’s autonomy.

But social science backs up Clinton’s anecdotal hunch. “We think she was right in her analysis about women getting pressure from men in their lives, specifically [straight] white women,” said Kelsy Kretschmer, an assistant professor at Oregon State University and a co-author of a recent study examining women’s voting patterns.

In her piece, Graves heavily cites a study published in April from Oregon State University Professor Kelsy Kretschmer, which was based on a hypothesis from a 2012 study published in Political Research Quarterly that asked 2,000 women about their voting patterns.

Single women vote on behalf of other women, while married women vote with their husbands and families in mind, according to the research.

Advertisement

“Just being married” makes women more conservative, Kretschmer noted.

One woman, for instance, admitted to voting for Trump because she believed he would have her husband's economic interests at heart because he works in the coal industry. That is just one “heartbreaking” example of why married women chose not to vote for Clinton, according to Kretschmer.

So, don’t blame Clinton for losing so many female votes, The Guardian concludes.

I hate to repeat myself, but women have a mind of their own. That doesn’t change once their boyfriends put a ring on it. Clinton won just 54 percent of the women vote. Sorry, but that was not all due to marital pressure. 

(Maybe she is just not a very good messenger.) 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement