If You're a Dem and The View of All Places Turns Its Back...
So, Nancy Mace's Gubernatorial Hopes Might've Been Nuked From Orbit...
Scott Pelley Thinks He Runs CBS News; MS NOW Delivers a Gross of...
To Democrats, Cosplaying the Oppression of Women Is 'Fun'
This Is How You Stop Mass Shootings at Churches
Javier Milei's Experiment in Pure Free Markets Just Proved the 'Experts' Wrong Again
Body Cam Footage Released in the Shocking Murder of Henry Nowak
Florida Scores Major Win to Keep New Electoral Map in Place
Talarico Campaign Refuses to Deny He Had Inappropriate Relationships With Other Staffers
Slain Student's Family Blasts Chicago's Sanctuary Policies After Killer Found With Weapon...
New York's Government Won't Hand Over Documents About the CDL Holder Who Killed...
Graham Platner Ducks Media Interviews After Explosive Sexting Scandal
Anti-Weaponization Fund Gets Scrapped, But That's Not Enough for Chuck Schumer
Federal Court Blocks Trump Administration Ban on Transgender Service Members
Goodbye Pride Month, Hello Nuclear Family Month
Tipsheet

Feinstein Attacks Catholic Judicial Nominee at Hearing

Feinstein Attacks Catholic Judicial Nominee at Hearing

President Trump's 7th Circuit Court of Appeals nominee Amy Coney Barrett emphatically told the Senate Judiciary Committee during her confirmation hearing Wednesday that she would not let her Catholic faith influence her court decisions.

Advertisement

Senator after senator proved they didn't hear her, or at least didn't care to. Dick Durbin (D-IL) was one a few Democrats obsessed over the language in speeches and articles Barrett has written about religion and public life.

“Are you an orthodox Catholic?” he asked her, clearly concerned she would isolate Catholics who are pro-abortion.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) had by far the most inappropriate line of questioning, however.

Feinstein has put judicial nominees on the spot before over their faith. For example, she had no problem grilling now Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch. Worried that he would upend abortion rights, she informed him that Roe v. Wade is "super precedent."

Advertisement

He, too, had to explain himself several times that the only guiding force for his judicial decisions would be the Constitution - no matter how controversial the issue is.

Feinstein has once again gotten away with her rude religious litmus tests. Would that be the case if Barrett was of a different faith?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement