That Time MSNBC Ripped an NHL Player for Not Accepting an Obama White...
New Emails Appear to Contradict Biden's Involvement Regarding the Mar-a-Lago Ransacking
Teens Say AI Is Now Part Of Everyday Life–Many Parents Have No Idea
Georgia Parents Took Their Baby to the Hospital – What Happened Next Is...
This College Is Facing a Massive DOJ Lawsuit for Allowing Antisemitism on Campus
Joy Reid Sings Off Key to Protest Trump's State of the Union Speech...
Wisconsin Leftists File Lawsuit to Fund Failing Public Schools, End School Choice
Rep. Robin Kelly Mocks State of the Union Medal Recipients
Is This the Best Hakeem Jeffries Can Do in Response to the State...
Dear, Gavin Newsom: Stop Using Dyslexia As a Shield
Four Dead in Mass Stabbing in Washington State
JD Vance Reveals What He Saw From Democrats During the State of the...
CNN’s Harry Enten Says 2028 Dem Primary Is ‘a Total Clown Car’ As...
Fetterman Blasts His Side of the Aisle for Their Blatant Disrespect of Erika...
Mike Johnson Says He Nearly Ejected These Members of the Squad Over Their...
Tipsheet

Feinstein Attacks Catholic Judicial Nominee at Hearing

Feinstein Attacks Catholic Judicial Nominee at Hearing

President Trump's 7th Circuit Court of Appeals nominee Amy Coney Barrett emphatically told the Senate Judiciary Committee during her confirmation hearing Wednesday that she would not let her Catholic faith influence her court decisions.

Advertisement

Senator after senator proved they didn't hear her, or at least didn't care to. Dick Durbin (D-IL) was one a few Democrats obsessed over the language in speeches and articles Barrett has written about religion and public life.

“Are you an orthodox Catholic?” he asked her, clearly concerned she would isolate Catholics who are pro-abortion.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) had by far the most inappropriate line of questioning, however.

Feinstein has put judicial nominees on the spot before over their faith. For example, she had no problem grilling now Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch. Worried that he would upend abortion rights, she informed him that Roe v. Wade is "super precedent."

Advertisement

He, too, had to explain himself several times that the only guiding force for his judicial decisions would be the Constitution - no matter how controversial the issue is.

Feinstein has once again gotten away with her rude religious litmus tests. Would that be the case if Barrett was of a different faith?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos