Don’t Listen to Idiots About the Iran War
Why Pete Hegseth and Marco Rubio Could Possibly Be Relocated Soon
This Dem Senator Tried to Spew a Total Lie About Trump and Iran,...
We Have More Info on Mamdani's Wife Social Media Activity...and It's Not Pretty
This House Dem Didn't Just Say That About Thomas Paine and Illegal Immigration
JB Pritzker Promises to Weaponize Government
This Musician Mocked Cops Who Unjustly Raided His Home – Now the Officers...
The Second Coming of DOGE
Metal Rain and Tired Folks
Fact vs. Fiction on Medicaid and the Wealth Tax
They're Not Really After 'the Rich'
Could Cuban Communism Be on the Cusp of Collapse?
The Illusion of Control in a Time of War
Iran and the Return of Perpetual War: Moral Cause—or the Human Condition?
Not the Same America
Tipsheet

New Defense Bill Exceeds Trump’s Request

New Defense Bill Exceeds Trump’s Request

In his interview with Christian Broadcast Network's Pat Robertson, President Trump mused that Russia would have been much happier if his opponent Hillary Clinton had won. She would have "depleted" the U.S. military, he said. Trump intends to build our defense, he said. The new National Defense Authorization Act that passed Friday suggests that he meant what he said.

Advertisement

The $696 billion bill, which passed in a vote of 344-81, will provide the military with more resources to produce more ships, aircraft, as well as allow for troop increases. In May, Trump proposed $603 billion in military build up, meaning Congress exceeded his expectations.

The House-passed NDAA bill would add 17,000 soldiers to the Army, something requested by the service but unfunded under the president's budget, as well as authorize purchase of four additional Navy ships, 17 more F-35 fighter jets, and eight more F/A-18 Super Hornet jets. The House bill is comprised of two sections, one that would authorize $631.6 billion in base defense spending, and $65 billion in overseas war spending.

As always, the NDAA didn't pass without some serious hurdles and controversies. For instance, conservatives were uncomfortable with an Obama-era provision that provided funding for transgender troops. 

Advertisement

Obama's "transgender decision is costly in dollars and short on common sense," Republicans like Rep. Vicky Vicky Hartzler (R-MO) argued, adding that if the provision remains, taxpayers will be subject to paying for transition surgeries and hormone treatments. However, the effort was defeated and the funding for transgender medical care remains in place.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement