Roommate of Laken Riley's Killer Drops a Bombshell at Trial
An Update on Dennis Prager
Chris Matthews Nails What's Wrong With Dems
Preliminary Results of Des Moines Register Investigation Into Selzer Poll
PA Supreme Court to Dems: The Steal Ends Now
Kristen Welker Ignores Lawfare
Ohio Democrats Are Out of Their Minds With This One
Dems Still in Disarray: Fetterman Tells His Fellow Democrats to Calm Down
Yikes: What Biden Missed Out on at His Last G20
Will the House Ethics Committee Release Its Report on Matt Gaetz? Well...
Donald Trump Picks His Secretary of Transportation
Post-Election Memo Reveals More Good News for Trump and Republicans
Here's Why a Slew of College Athletes Filed a Title IX Lawsuit
Wow: Iowa's 'Gold Standard' Pollster Is Quitting Election Polling After Badly Botching Fin...
Here's Who AOC Is Now Blaming for Election Losses
Tipsheet

New Defense Bill Exceeds Trump’s Request

In his interview with Christian Broadcast Network's Pat Robertson, President Trump mused that Russia would have been much happier if his opponent Hillary Clinton had won. She would have "depleted" the U.S. military, he said. Trump intends to build our defense, he said. The new National Defense Authorization Act that passed Friday suggests that he meant what he said.

Advertisement

The $696 billion bill, which passed in a vote of 344-81, will provide the military with more resources to produce more ships, aircraft, as well as allow for troop increases. In May, Trump proposed $603 billion in military build up, meaning Congress exceeded his expectations.

The House-passed NDAA bill would add 17,000 soldiers to the Army, something requested by the service but unfunded under the president's budget, as well as authorize purchase of four additional Navy ships, 17 more F-35 fighter jets, and eight more F/A-18 Super Hornet jets. The House bill is comprised of two sections, one that would authorize $631.6 billion in base defense spending, and $65 billion in overseas war spending.

As always, the NDAA didn't pass without some serious hurdles and controversies. For instance, conservatives were uncomfortable with an Obama-era provision that provided funding for transgender troops. 

Advertisement

Obama's "transgender decision is costly in dollars and short on common sense," Republicans like Rep. Vicky Vicky Hartzler (R-MO) argued, adding that if the provision remains, taxpayers will be subject to paying for transition surgeries and hormone treatments. However, the effort was defeated and the funding for transgender medical care remains in place.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement