Can JD Vance Be Present for Every White House Press Briefing? This Was...
Family Member of Woman Who Tried to Ram ICE Agents in Minneapolis Had...
Jimmy Kimmel's Rant About the ICE Shooting in Minneapolis Shows Why Comedians Can't...
Here's the Thread Explaining Why ICE Killing a Crazed Leftist Who Attacked Federal...
Senate Just Voted on a Resolution Limiting Trump's Ability to Approve Military Operations...
Minnesota Prosecutors Considering Murder Charge for ICE Agent
Immigrant Fraudsters Aren't Going to Like This Bill If It Passes
Donald Trump Just Struck a Devastating Blow Against Globalism
'Is Our Children Learning:' Check Out This Sign at the Domestic Terrorist Rally...
Ted Cruz Calls for Impeachment of Two Federal Judges Over ‘Constitutional Injury’
'We Are Watching Every Step:' NYC Councilwoman Inna Vernikov Puts Mamdani's Radical Staff...
Leftist Shill Mehdi Hasan Wants the Next Democratic President to Do What?
You Might Be a Democrat If…
ICE Agent Who Killed Woman After She Tried to Run Him Over Had...
Mamdani’s ‘Rental Ripoff’ Hearings: A Kangaroo Court for Landlords
Tipsheet

Federal Court Rejects Trump Admin's Bid to Delay EPA Regulation on Drilling

President Trump scored a court victory last week when the Supreme Court reinstated part of his controversial travel order. It was a win for national security, he and his supporters cheered. Yet, his deregulatory agenda hit a snag in the courts Monday, as the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that his administration cannot delay EPA rules put in place by Obama to limit drilling.

Advertisement

Obama's EPA set out to place methane emissions standards at drilling sites. Environmentalists argue it is a necessary mandate to prevent leaks of a powerful greenhouse gas and other pollutants, reports The Hill. Yet, the Trump administration aimed to change course, charging that the rules were unfair to stakeholders who had no opportunity to comment on some parts of the final regulation.

Yet, the rule must stand, according to the circuit court judges.

“The administrative record thus makes clear that industry groups had ample opportunity to comment on all four issues on which EPA granted reconsideration, and indeed, that in several instances the agency incorporated those comments directly into the final rule,” two of the judges on the three-judge panel wrote.

“Because it was thus not ‘impracticable’ for industry groups to have raised such objections during the notice and comment period [the Clean Air Act] did not require reconsideration and did not authorize the stay.”
Advertisement

The EPA, led by Administrator Scott Pruitt, has not been totally stymied by the court, however. The agency is on his way to rolling back at least 30 Obama-era regulations. One of the most notable reversals so far was President Trump's decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accords - a deal Trump said would have badly damaged our economy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos