WNBA's Issue With Viral Meme of Sophie Cunningham Once Again Proves This League...
Yeah, About That FDA Update on the Diarrhea Lettuce ...
I Never Thought I'd Say This About the Dems, Especially Regarding This Aspect...
Has Anyone at The New York Times Met a Working Mother?
It Turns Out Oregon Is Pumping Children Full of Wrong Sex Drugs
In Mamdani's New York City, Open-Air Black Markets for Meds Are Now the...
Remember When Kamala Harris Wanted Paper Ballots for Our Elections?
MS NOW Says All Women Can Lose ALL Rights, via the Mail; NYT...
Check Out Why This WNBA Coach Was Suspended for One Game
Forget Reading, Writing and Arithmetic—Virginia Students Will Learn This Instead
Mamdani Gets Kicked Down for Trying to Take a World Cup Victory Lap
Everyone's Furious About Housing Prices. But Almost No One's Blaming the Right Culprit.
The FDA Still Doesn't Know Who Caused the Diarrhea Parasite Outbreak
Florida Surrogate Fights to Keep Triplets After Chinese 'Father' Never Showed Up
Trump Admin Just Fired Back at Canada Over 'Discriminatory' Actions
Tipsheet

Federal Court Rejects Trump Admin's Bid to Delay EPA Regulation on Drilling

Federal Court Rejects Trump Admin's Bid to Delay EPA Regulation on Drilling

President Trump scored a court victory last week when the Supreme Court reinstated part of his controversial travel order. It was a win for national security, he and his supporters cheered. Yet, his deregulatory agenda hit a snag in the courts Monday, as the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that his administration cannot delay EPA rules put in place by Obama to limit drilling.

Advertisement

Obama's EPA set out to place methane emissions standards at drilling sites. Environmentalists argue it is a necessary mandate to prevent leaks of a powerful greenhouse gas and other pollutants, reports The Hill. Yet, the Trump administration aimed to change course, charging that the rules were unfair to stakeholders who had no opportunity to comment on some parts of the final regulation.

Yet, the rule must stand, according to the circuit court judges.

“The administrative record thus makes clear that industry groups had ample opportunity to comment on all four issues on which EPA granted reconsideration, and indeed, that in several instances the agency incorporated those comments directly into the final rule,” two of the judges on the three-judge panel wrote.

“Because it was thus not ‘impracticable’ for industry groups to have raised such objections during the notice and comment period [the Clean Air Act] did not require reconsideration and did not authorize the stay.”
Advertisement

The EPA, led by Administrator Scott Pruitt, has not been totally stymied by the court, however. The agency is on his way to rolling back at least 30 Obama-era regulations. One of the most notable reversals so far was President Trump's decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accords - a deal Trump said would have badly damaged our economy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos