It’s Not 1950 Anymore But Democrats Are Still Racists
A Media Shallow Dive on Kash Patel 'Desecrating' Snorkeling Trip; Press Headaches Still...
Maryland Madness: Lead Ammo Prohibitions Dead – for Now
A Lesson in Economics for AOC
Nakba Forever
Make America Florida
Nullification With a Press Release
Book Review: A Call to Restore America’s Foundations
Hey, Gen Z, Be Nice to Your Prom Date
Kevin O’Leary’s Utah Data Center: To Use Renewables or Not to Use Renewables
The Mifepristone Manufacturers’ Blame-Game—and the High Court’s Capitulation—Are Hard Pill...
Parents Can No Longer Trust Librarians. Here’s Who to Blame.
Surprise: The WNBA Still Hates Caitlin Clark
Stephen Miller Scorches Thomas Massie Over ICE Funding Votes
Wow, TrumpRx Is Going To Save How Much Money for Americans?
Tipsheet

Federal Court Rejects Trump Admin's Bid to Delay EPA Regulation on Drilling

Federal Court Rejects Trump Admin's Bid to Delay EPA Regulation on Drilling

President Trump scored a court victory last week when the Supreme Court reinstated part of his controversial travel order. It was a win for national security, he and his supporters cheered. Yet, his deregulatory agenda hit a snag in the courts Monday, as the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that his administration cannot delay EPA rules put in place by Obama to limit drilling.

Advertisement

Obama's EPA set out to place methane emissions standards at drilling sites. Environmentalists argue it is a necessary mandate to prevent leaks of a powerful greenhouse gas and other pollutants, reports The Hill. Yet, the Trump administration aimed to change course, charging that the rules were unfair to stakeholders who had no opportunity to comment on some parts of the final regulation.

Yet, the rule must stand, according to the circuit court judges.

“The administrative record thus makes clear that industry groups had ample opportunity to comment on all four issues on which EPA granted reconsideration, and indeed, that in several instances the agency incorporated those comments directly into the final rule,” two of the judges on the three-judge panel wrote.

“Because it was thus not ‘impracticable’ for industry groups to have raised such objections during the notice and comment period [the Clean Air Act] did not require reconsideration and did not authorize the stay.”
Advertisement

The EPA, led by Administrator Scott Pruitt, has not been totally stymied by the court, however. The agency is on his way to rolling back at least 30 Obama-era regulations. One of the most notable reversals so far was President Trump's decision to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris Climate Accords - a deal Trump said would have badly damaged our economy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement