So, That's Who CNN Was Busted Partying With in London Last Month
So, That's Why Dallas Police Shot and Killed a Member of Jasmine Crockett's...
A Texas Jury Convicts an Antifa Cell of Domestic Terrorism; Sympathetic Media Hardest...
A Dissent for the Ages
Miami Man Gets 27 Months in Prison Over $2M PPP Fraud Conspiracy via...
Air Travelers Face Hours-Long TSA Lines Because Democrats Won't Fund DHS
New York Times Describes Suspected Michigan Terrorist as 'Quiet Restaurant Worker'
Honda Braces for Nearly $16B in EV Losses, Cancels 3 Planned Models
So, That's How Republicans Just Lost a Long-Held Mayoral Seat By a Single...
The Cuba Situation Just Got a Lot More Crazy
Nevada Woman Accused of Running Fake Business to Traffic SNAP Benefits
Florida Man Causes Delay to Players Championship For Wacky Escape After Double Homicide
Romanian-Linked Theft Ring Accused of Draining $4M From CA Public Assistance Accounts
Trump Announces Build Up of War Ships in the Strait of Hormuz
The Congressman the Left Hates the Most Just Announced a Major Immigration Reform...
Tipsheet

Appeals Court Strikes Down North Carolina Voter ID Law, Calls It 'Discriminatory'

Appeals Court Strikes Down North Carolina Voter ID Law, Calls It 'Discriminatory'

Another blow has been dealt to the nation's voter ID laws. A week after an appeals court struck down Texas' voter ID law, the Tar Heel State has done the same thing. Voters will not be required to show photo identification when casting in-person ballots, because, the Fourth Circuit argued, it was racist to begin with.

Advertisement

"In holding that the legislature did not enact the challenged provisions with discriminatory intent, the court seems to have missed the forest in carefully surveying the many trees," the panel wrote in its opinion.

The opinion later states: "We cannot ignore the record evidence that, because of race, the legislature enacted one of the largest restrictions of the franchise in modern North Carolina history."

In 2013, the North Carolina General Assembly, which ABC News noted was conservative, enacted the voter law to the chagrin of the state NAACP and League of Women Voters. Both groups, along with the U.S. Department of Justice sued the state for allowing a law they say violated the Civil Rights Act and the Constitution.

One attorney on Twitter noticed a touch of hypocrisy with the Fourth District Court's decision.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement