Georgia's Brad Raffensperger Might Have Some Company in His Election Bunker Tonight
Will Thomas Massie Lose His Primary? He Should.
Ken Paxton, John Cornyn Respond After Trump Makes Endorsement in Texas Senate Race
Federal Judge Bars ICE From Making Arrests in Immigration Courts
Cryin' Chuck Is Big Mad About Trump's $2 Billion Settlement
Here's What Vice President Vance Had to Say at Today's White House Briefing
Scott Jennings Shamed the CNN Panel for Ignoring the Persecution of Christians
The Best of America: Hundreds of Patriots Attended Funeral for World War II...
President Trump Just Dropped His Endorsement in the Texas Senate Race
Free the Mail
Texas Court Rules Accused Stalker's Gun Ban Should Be Reconsidered
Watch Karen Bass's Hilarious Self-Own As She Tries to Blast Spencer Pratt
The Homeless Crisis in Los Angeles Is Even Worse Than You Think
Kentucky’s Message to Washington
Thomas Massie Sends Out Flat-Out False Campaign Text
Tipsheet

Justice Don Willett Questioned About Tweet Suggesting He'd Support Human/Bacon Marriage

Justice Don Willett Questioned About Tweet Suggesting He'd Support Human/Bacon Marriage

During his confirmation hearing on Wednesday, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) asked 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals nominee Don Willett to explain one of his tweets where he said that he would support a constitutional right to marry bacon. Leahy suggested that the tweet indicated that Willett would not respect precedent if he were confirmed to the court.

Advertisement

The tweet: 

The tweet in question was sent on April 30, 2015, two days after oral arguments were heard by the Supreme Court in the Obergefell v. Hodges case. The decision was announced on June 26, 2015. Willett (erroneously) said that it was made after the decision was issued, and was his attempt to "inject a bit of levity" to a "divisive time." 

"Senator, I believe every American is entitled to equal worth and dignity. I've never intended to disparage anyone, and would never do so. That's not where my heart is," Willett explained. Leahy seemed unwavered.

Earlier in the hearing, Leahy said that Willett's tweet about a male-to-female transgender athlete joining a softball team was offensive, and meant that Willett would not be fair to a case involving an LGBTQ person. That tweet was made on February 14, 2014. Willett explained that the tweet was intended to be a reference to former New York Yankees player Alex Rodriguez, (who had recently dropped a lawsuit against the MLB and serve a yearlong suspension) not the transgender athlete.

Advertisement

I mean, come on. Both of those tweets were clearly jokes, and Willett was officially named the "Tweeter Laureate" of Texas in 2015. It's not a good look to be so incredibly humourless that you'd attack a person for tweets that were not intended to be serious. Willett should be judged on the merits of his decisions, not for his 140-character bursts. (Which are, admittedly, quite funny.) 

Since he was nominated to the court, he has ceased his Twitter use, save this tweet earlier on Wednesday:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement