Ted Cruz Didn't Mince Words When Ripping Into Antony Blinken
Jen Psaki's Book Lands Her in More Hot Water
Biden Admin Admits Release of Gas Reserves Is 'Timed' to Lower Prices Before...
BREAKING: Here's Why RNC HQ Was Placed on Locked Down This Morning
Biden Announces Another Student Loan Bailout
Zelensky's Term Should Have Ended on Monday. Here's Why He's Still in Power.
'Shameful': Three Nations Announce They Are Recognizing a Palestinian State
WaPo Gets a New Headline Suggestion for Story on Florida Meteorologist's Criticism of...
NJ Gym Owner Who Defied State Orders to Close During Pandemic Sees 'Major...
Here's Who Won California's Special Election to Fill McCarthy’s Seat
What Raisi’s Death Means for Iran, the World
Reuters Poll: Biden's Job Approval Falls to Lowest Level Since...
Trump Was Asked About Policies Restricting Birth Control. Here's What He Said.
This Republican Senate Candidate Wants to Codify Roe v. Wade
What an Expert Witness for Trump's Defense Would Have Told Jurors If He...

Oklahoma Votes to Ban A.P. U.S. History, Is Dumb

Dear Lawmakers in Oklahoma,

It is not a good idea to vote to eliminate funding for A.P. U.S. History (APUSH) classes in high schools.


  • This makes you look ridiculously stupid and overreactive.
  • A.P. courses are a way for students to save money for college, and removing these opportunities is not a good thing.
  • A.P. courses add to the rigor of a student's college application, making them a more competitive applicant, and it's pointless to limit these opportunities.
  • This kind of vote distracts from the real issues at hand in regards to education and the content of the APUSH course, and instead leads to people mocking your vote rather than actually look at the issue that you're trying to address.


Christine Rousselle

(Scarborough High School Class of 2009, A.P. U.S. History, 2008)


In all seriousness, though, this is dumb and irresponsible legislating. 

While the College Board's updated APUSH guidelines have raised ire last year, it's important to note that these are a framework, not a set syllabus or curriculum. The A.P. exam, administered in May, has fairly broad essay questions and multiple choice that covered a wide spectrum of American history. (Plus, to take the exam and potentially receive college credit, you don't actually have to take the class during the year.) This legislation could put high school students at a disadvantage simply because a lawmaker was being a drama queen and trying to score some political brownie points. That's not good.

There are legitimate problems with education in the United States that are worth looking in to and legislating changes. Reducing history class options for high-achieving students is not one of them.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos