Why Abigail Spanberger Is Already Getting Ripped for Her SOTU Response
The Vibes for the US Men's Hockey Team Are So High, We Got...
Canadians Are Having a Rough Week
Iranian Students Torch Regime’s Symbols As Protests Erupt on Colleges
FedEx Wants a Refund for Trump's Tariffs – an International Court Will Decide
Look Who Ro Khanna Is Bringing to the State of the Union Tonight
Tom Tiffany Fires Back After Evers Says Wisconsin Would ‘Implode’ Without Illegal Immigran...
Dana Bash Pulls No Punches in Her Interview With Gavin Newsom
Is Time Running Out for Sanctuary Cities?
Gun Rights Group Wants Explanation From Anti-Gunner Bloomberg Over Epstein Ties
Dan Bongino Goes Nuclear on Candace Owens
Speaker Johnson Slams Democrats for Holding Five Counter-Events to Trump’s State of the...
Dan Bongino on the Mexican Cartels: The Donroe Doctrine Is Not a Joke...
SURPRISE: Guess What Thomas Massie Is Doing for the State of the Union
The Career of Tim Walz Is Over, and He Intends to Destroy Gun...
Tipsheet

"It's Unfair to the Public": GOP Representative Urges Senate to Give Merrick Garland a Hearing

"It's Unfair to the Public": GOP Representative Urges Senate to Give Merrick Garland a Hearing

Speaking at a press conference on Monday, Rep. Daniel Donovan (R-NY) stated that Senate Republicans were wrong to block Pres. Obama’s pick for the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland, without giving him a hearing. The Senate’s inaction in this matter has, according to Donovan, impeded the function of the Supreme Court and given the public reason to lose faith in the government’s competence.

Advertisement

“I think this is an issue that people could point at and say, ‘See, government’s stalled, government doesn’t move forward,’” said Donovan. “There’s a very important seat open in the Supreme Court, the people that interpret the rules of the country will live by. And it’s unfair to the public.”

In arguing that the Senate should give Garland a hearing, Donovan breaks with his party’s strategy, which has been to obstruct Obama’s nomination in case a Republican president is elected in the fall. A Republican president would presumably nominate a conservative justice to the Supreme Court, while Obama’s choice of Garland is more liberal. The stakes are particularly high because Garland’s confirmation would tip the court into a liberal majority—a situation that many Republicans wish to avoid.

The Senate GOP has mostly stood firm against pressure from the White House and congressional Democrats, who have used the hashtag #doyourjob to argue that it is the senators’ congressional duty to give Garland a hearing. Only two GOP senators have departed from the party line—Sen. Mark Kirk (Ill.) and Sen. Susan Collins (Maine). Sen. Jerry Moran originally joined them in their dissent but later rescinded it, likely due to pressure from party leaders.

Advertisement

Related:

MERRICK GARLAND

“I’ve never thought that was a good idea,” said Donovan of the strategy. “I’ve always thought that the Republicans were wrong, that they should see who the nominee was…and judge him on his abilities, his jurisprudence. I think it’s one of the things that gets the public upset about politics, that they see things not moving.”

“You don’t have to confirm the nomination,” Donovan said further. “But they should hold the hearings.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement