Pre-Election Special SALE: 60% Off VIP Membership
BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules on Whether Virginia Can Remove Non-Citizens From Voter Rolls
Tim Walz's Gaming Session With Ocasio-Cortez Was a Trainwreck
Oregon Predicates Request to Judge on Self-Delusion
GDP Report Shows Economy 'Weaker Than Expected'
How Trump Plans to Help Compensate Victims of 'Migrant Crime'
NRCC Blasts the Left's Voter Suppression Efforts in Battleground Districts
Watch Trump's Reaction to Finding Out Biden Called His Supporters 'Garbage'
26 Republican AGs Join Virginia in Petitioning SCOTUS to Intervene in Voter Registration...
There Was a Vile, Violent Attack in Chicago, and the Media's Been Silent....
One Red State Just Acquired a Massive Amount of Land to Secure Its...
Poll Out of Texas Shows That Harris Rally Sure Didn't Work for Colin...
This Hollywood Actor Is Persuading Christian Men to Vote for Kamala Harris
Is the Trump Campaign Over-Confident?
Is This Really How the Kamala HQ Is Going to Respond to Biden’s...
Tipsheet

ObamaCare and RomneyCare

Chief Justice Roberts today alluded to the key difference between ObamaCare and the Massachusetts health care plan passed while Mitt Romney was governor:

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: The key in Lochner is that we were talking about regulation of the States, right, and the States are not limited to enumerated powers. The Federal Government is. And it seems to me it's an entirely different question when you ask yourself whether or not there are going to be limits in the Federal power, as opposed to limits on the States, which was the issue in Lochner.
Advertisement

I am not a big fan of the Massachusetts health plan,but it's disingenuous to ignore the key difference between the exercise of state power and federal power.  

In the case of Lochner v. New York (1905) (now discredited), referenced above, the Supreme Court overturned a state law limiting the hours bakers could be forced to work.  Subsequently, courts have recognized that though the federal government is one of enumerated powers, state legislatures have a more general "police power" -- an ability to legislate for the "general welfare," as it were, that the federal government lacks.  

So one can argue the merits and the wisdom of the Massachusetts plan . . . but unlike ObamaCare, which seeks to regulate all Americans, there's no reason to believe it's unconstitutional.

This is, of course, a key distinction for all those who care about the concept of federalism.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement