Based on the Preliminary Info About the Trump Trial Jurors, the Rigged Narrative...
New NPR CEO's Take on the First Amendment Is What You'd Expect
There Are School Walkouts Happening Over Furries. Please Shoot Me Into the Sun.
Are Iran's Nine Lives Nearing an End?
Ich Bin Ein Uri Berliner
Hold Obama-Biden Foreign Policy Responsible for Iran's Unprecedented Attack on Israel
There Was Another Close Call on Runway of Reagan National Airport
Reporter to KJP: Can We See the 'Cannibal' Tab in Your Book?
US Vetoes UN Resolution on Palestinian Membership
Did This Factor Into Gallagher's Early Resignation Decision?
The World Is Paying a Deadly Price for Barack Obama's Foreign Policy Legacy
Maybe Larger Families Will Produce Better Leaders, as in the Early US
The Mainstream Media: American Democracy’s Greatest Threat
Who's Ahead? New Barrage of 2024 Polling Sheds Light on Presidential, Senate Races
We've Found the Most Insane Transgender Criminal Case Yet
Tipsheet

Newt's Negatives

With Newt Gingrich suddenly making a plausible case that he can win the GOP nomination, Democrats are gleefully surveying the lines of attack they can use against him
Advertisement
-- his congressional career, his temperament, and his personal history.

Take a look at his sky-high negatives.  If I were a Democrat, I would be praying -- p-r-a-y-i-n-g -- that enough Republicans would decide that Mitt Romney is too unexciting and ideologically impure, thereby replacing him with a guy with a history as a lobbyist, subject of an ethics investigation, turbulent personal life (whom people already dislike) and a history of never winning any election outside his own deep red district, where he was reelected twice, in 1990 and 1992, by fewer than a thousand votes).

Republicans who think that Gingrich can somehow change America's mind as he's changed some Republicans' are dreaming.  He'll be targeted from day one by an unimaginable assault of negative ads, unlike anything he's ever seen.  Trying to explain the "truth" about ethics charges or one's work as Freddie Mac's "historian" is a long and complicated process -- most people, who have lives of their own, aren't going to expend the energy to sort through every detail.  They'll just know that the one thing they do ilke about Obama is his apparently strong personal life and their sense that he's trying hard (even if they don't like the results).  And compared to Gingrich, who has been a creature of Washington for almost 30 years, President Obama IS an outsider.  
Advertisement

It's worth remembering that most voters aren't political junkies, and they don't see political debates in stark, manichean terms.  They aren't interested in rhetoric about "Alinkyites" and are largely turned off by characterizations like "food stamp president."  They are tired of division and tired of being lectured by those who presume they know best (whether they are on the left or the right).

But no doubt Newt Gingrich -- with weak managerial skills and a campaign so disorganized that he can't even get on the ballot in Virginia -- can win enough of them over to beat the billion dollar Obama campaign machine.  All it takes is strong debating skills and an oddly co-dependent relationship with the press.




Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement