As Campuses Burn, Here's What Biden's Been Busy Doing
Here's the One Tweet That Perfectly Captures Pro-Hamas Clowns at Columbia University
Israel's Latest Move in Gaza Is Going to Infuriate the Pro-Hamas College Kids...
One Moment Amid Campus Chaos at UNC Chapel Hill Will Give You Hope...
Columbia Is Reaping What It Sowed, and So Is America
Surprise: Cost Estimate for Floating Gaza Pier Doubles
EEOC Commissioner Blasts New Federal Workplace Guidelines for Erasing Women's Rights
Omar Faces Censure Threat for Her Recent Comments at Columbia University
EcoHealth Alliance Gets Millions More in Taxpayer Money
Washington’s Troops, Today’s Protesters
NY Squad Members Hardest Hit by NYPD's Involvement in Quelling Columbia's Pro-Hamas Protes...
Trump Just Got More Good Polling News, But What About Key Senate Races?
Tulsi Gabbard Takes on Today’s Real Racists in Explosive ‘For Love of Country’...
Texas Rancher Explains Why He Would Allow Gov. Abbott to Build the Border...
Marjorie Taylor Greene Announces New Plan to Oust Mike Johnson
Tipsheet

Abandoning the White Working Class

The New York Times' Thomas Edsall discusses the Democrats' decision effectively to dump the white working class from its coalition.  As Edsall makes clear, it's a decision born of necessity -- non-minority working people have, in effect, abandoned the party that once credibly claimed to represent them.
Advertisement

What this means, as Edsall points out, is that the Democratic coalition will now be composed of two disparate groups: Highly educated white liberals on the one hand, and minorities on the other.  Notably, there is no real ideological coherence in terms of unity of interest that can emerge from the match.

Notwithstanding the increasing number of minorities in the United States, it strikes me that keeping this coalition together will present problems for the Democrats -- and, indirectly, for the country.  The problem for the Democrats is that their two groups are ideologically incompatible on many scores: The white liberals care mostly about left-wing social policy, while many minorities are socially conservative.  And there may come a time when even white liberals acknowledge that limits should exist to the concept of "spreading the wealth around" in order to pay for ever-more-massive public spending, right now often (but not always!) supported by minority groups.

Should this two-part coalition begin to splinter, it may improve the chances of Republican electoral success, but it will cause ugliness in the country.  Why?  Because with no thematically coherent agenda, and in their desperation to keep minorities within the party fold, Democrats will continue (and escalate) their efforts to paint Republicans -- and America itself -- as racist so that they remain the only perceived choice for minorities.  Division -- and, ironically, instilling fear of the (conservative/Republican) "other" -- will be the key way for Democrats to hold their party together.
Advertisement

It's an ironic reversal of FDR's injunction about having to fear only fear itself, isn't it?  Even so, Democrats will probably calculate that it's easier to hold the coalition together by playing the race card than it is to convince affluent, well-educated white liberals to accept a slower pace of social change -- more acceptable, usually, to minorities.

All this, of course, is a challenge -- and an opportunity -- for Republicans.  No, not to embrace left-wing social policy to win back educated white liberals -- but to find a way to appeal to minorities without simply promising more redistribution of wealth, a la the Democrats.  And it's going to take a cultural shift to precipitate this political one.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement