A Few Simple Snarky Rules to Make Life Better
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Fifth Circuit Rules That Some Illegal Aliens Can Be Detained Without Bond Until...
Tipsheet

A HUGE Breach of Trust

The willingness of some of the GOP's "supercommittee" members to consider tax increases is an incredible breach of trust.

It spells disaster for the Republican "brand" -- if those who repeatedly pledged not to raise taxes now do so in an ugly "Read My Lips" redux, why should any of us ever believe any Republican politician again?  If GOP leaders want to go into the semi-permanent political wilderness, they should follow this foolhardy course: It all but guarantees the emergence of a third party that will split the GOP-conservative coalition and boost the Democrats. 
Advertisement

What's more, it's terrible policy.  With a struggling economy, everyone knows that the worst thing to do is to increase the economic burden on those most likely to create jobs.  Want long-term unemployment and even less economic activity?  By all means, make higher income people give more to the government so that they have less to spend on the kind of activities that create private-sector jobs.

If the GOP is smart, it will reject tax increases in every form.  Instead, it will promote and pass legislation to prevent the defense cuts from happening -- and ensure that the threat of massive defense cuts becomes the responsibility of the President and Democrats.  Note that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has warned against such drastic defense cuts, so legislation ensuring that they don't occur would actually bipartisan.  Forcing a House vote on such legislation would have the effect of splitting the Democratic party -- rather than allowing a "supercommittee" tax increase vote that would split Republicans.
Advertisement

Recall also that none of the threatened defense cuts would go into place until 2013 -- that's largely after the inauguration of a Republican president IF the GOP doesn't, once again, shoot itself in the foot by reneging on a "no taxes" pledge.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement