A Few Simple Snarky Rules to Make Life Better
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and it Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Tipsheet

A "Newt" Beginning?

With the news that some Republicans seem increasingly to be turning to Newt Gingrich as the "conservative alternative" to Mitt Romney, a word of caution may be in order.
Advertisement

He's a brilliant guy, and a great debater.  But he comes with baggage . . . a lot of it.

His work on behalf of the discredited Freddie Mac (he denies lobbying).



And ladies and gentlemen, that's just in the 2012 campaign.  From the 90's, we have a slew of "golden oldies": This, and this, and even this (though he denies this one, too).

And of course, there's the whole global warming thing.

There's a lot I admire about Newt Gingrich, not least his visionary leadership that resulted in Republican triumph in 1994.  But there is a flakiness factor about him that makes him ill-suited for the spotlight of a presidential campaign.  And every moment spent reviewing his controversial past is a moment not spent discussing President Obama's disastrous record.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement