A Few Simple Snarky Rules to Make Life Better
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 306: ‘Fear Not' Old Testament – Part 2
The War on Warring
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and it Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
The Real United States of America
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Tipsheet

The Romanoff Mess Deepens

If this account from the Denver Post is true, The White House was making it abundantly clear to Democrat Andrew Romanoff that an administration post might well be his if he dropped his primary challenge to Michael Bennett.
Advertisement


So were any crimes committed?  It's not clear (although it appears that there was plenty of intent to evade the spirit, if not the letter, of the law).  The only way we'll ever know if laws were broken is . . . if there's an investigation.   

What is clear, at the very least, is that there was a pattern and practice in the Obama administration of offering potential benefits to "inconvenient" Senate candidates in order to tempt them to drop divisive primary bids that might injure Democrats.

If the press is willing simply to take Democrats' word that "there's nothing to see here" when it comes to Romanoff/Sestak, it will be the most one-sided, pro-left dereliction of investigatory duty in recent years.    

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement