We Need to Ritually Sacrifice a Squish GOP Senator to Encourage the Others
We Have an Update on Bashar al-Assad's Wherabouts
Scumbag Adam Schiff Is Worried About Kash Patel
Would We Have Been Better Off If Trump Had Won In 2020?
The False Gods of Leftism
Six Weeks Until Our Long National Nightmare Is Over
A Pain In the Assad
At Last, Congress Acts: Bipartisan Bill Tackles AI Exploitation Epidemic
Trump, J6 Prisoners, and Biden. Here's What the President-Elect Said During His NBC...
How Obama Could Be Blamed for the Fall of Syria
Here's the List of People a Research Group Wants Pete Hegseth to Fire
ICYMI: Judge Throws Out Ray Epps' Bogus Lawsuit Against Tucker Carlson
Tommy Tuberville Shares What We're All Wondering About the Hunter Biden Pardon
Outgoing DNC Chair Promises to 'Name Names' the Day He Leaves Office
Joe Biden Breaks Silence After Assad Granted Asylum In Moscow
Tipsheet

Now They Tell Us - Part 703

The  NY Times' David Leonhardt reveals the dirty little secret behind ObamaCare:  It will ultimately involve denying care to Americans when someone (presumably, in the government) decides that care will not be "cost effective."  As Leonhardt admits:
Advertisement


From an economic perspective, health reform will fail if we can’t sometimes push back against the try-anything instinct.

When it's your child, or spouse, or parent who's at risk, it's not going to be terribly reassuring to hear that some options will simply be characterized as a "try-anything" gambit and refused because of their cost. 

And the end game is decidedly ugly.  As Leonhardt puts it:

Eventually, we may well have to decide against paying for expensive treatments with only modest benefits.

'Scuse me, but doesn't that sound eerily like the possibility of a death panel for Grandma -- at least if her treatment gets too "expensive" and the benefits to her are deemed to be "only modest"?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement