Pre-Election Special SALE: 60% Off VIP Membership
BREAKING: Supreme Court Rules on Whether Virginia Can Remove Non-Citizens From Voter Rolls
Tim Walz's Gaming Session With Ocasio-Cortez Was a Trainwreck
Oregon Predicates Request to Judge on Self-Delusion
GDP Report Shows Economy 'Weaker Than Expected'
How Trump Plans to Help Compensate Victims of 'Migrant Crime'
NRCC Blasts the Left's Voter Suppression Efforts in Battleground Districts
Watch Trump's Reaction to Finding Out Biden Called His Supporters 'Garbage'
26 Republican AGs Join Virginia in Petitioning SCOTUS to Intervene in Voter Registration...
There Was a Vile, Violent Attack in Chicago, and the Media's Been Silent....
One Red State Just Acquired a Massive Amount of Land to Secure Its...
Poll Out of Texas Shows That Harris Rally Sure Didn't Work for Colin...
This Hollywood Actor Is Persuading Christian Men to Vote for Kamala Harris
Is the Trump Campaign Over-Confident?
Is This Really How the Kamala HQ Is Going to Respond to Biden’s...
Tipsheet

More on ACORN (and Obama)?

A story is running in The Philadelphia Bulletin, alleging that the New York Times sat on an election-season story about the close ties between Obama and ACORN on the grounds that it would have been a "game-changer" for the election.
Advertisement


It strikes me that this is an entirely appropriate subject for more Congressional investigation, because if some of the allegations are true, there is a good chance that (surprise!) ACORN may have been implicated in violating federal election law.

As the debate continues over the fate of America's newspapers, it's worth asking: If this happened, did the New York Times really live up to what's supposed to be a newspaper's primary function: The reporting of news of public import, without fear or favor?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement