Joe Scarborough Really Stretched the Limits of Sanity With This Take on the...
Fiasco: NYC GOP Councilwoman Just Obliterated Mamdani Over the City's Shambolic Winter Sto...
CBS News Peddled Fake News About Bad Bunny and ICE Post-Super Bowl Performance
Yes, This Was the Best Response to John Kasich's Tweet About the Super...
A Bar Patron Had a Total Meltdown During the Super Bowl. The Reason...
Maybe We Should Be Glad Bad Bunny Performed in Spanish
Notice Where This Ex-ESPN Reporter's Attempt to Mock Conservatives Over Bad Bunny Laughabl...
Why Are Americans Fleeing Blue States for Red States?
Mayor Mamdani Becomes First NYC Leader to Skip Archbishop Installation in Almost a...
Is There Any Good News Out There?
Has There Been Voter Fraud?
When Canadians Were Actually Funny
The Student ICE Walkouts Are a Troubling Reminder of How Revolutionaries Are Made
America’s Security Doesn’t End at the Ice’s Edge
Talks About Talks: How Tehran Is Buying Time While Washington Hesitates
Tipsheet

So Who, Exactly, is "The White House"?

Correspondent Paul M. has passed on this post from Marc Ambinder.  It's an attempt to defend Chris Dodd from the fury surrounding the legislation that permitted the AIG bonuses.  But it may raise more questions than it answers,  Ambinder writes:
Advertisement


The truth is that the codicil [that enabled payment of the bonuses] was added in conference by mutual agreement of House and Senate Democrats and the White House.

So when the President says he knew nothing of the bonuses until recently, one has to ask, so just who at "the White House" was signing off on this legislative provision?  Did anyone bother to read the contracts that the provision was backstopping -- you  know, the ones that apparently guaranteed the bonuses?

And if they're this sloppy about this, how, exactly, do these people think that the government deserves a bigger role in, say, health care?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos